Sigma Quattro vs Sony W570
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
96 Imaging
39 Features
25 Overall
33
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W570 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Released February 2016
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.6-6.3) lens
- 116g - 91 x 52 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2011
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W570 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Sigma Quattro versus Sony W570, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Sigma and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the Quattro (29MP) and W570 (16MP) and the Quattro (APS-C) and W570 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Quattro was released 5 years later than the W570 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony W570 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the Quattro grades vs the W570 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W570 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Sigma sd Quattro & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W570. The complete galleries are provided at Sigma Quattro Gallery & Sony W570 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony W570
Quattro | W570 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2016 | January 2011 | Fresher by 63 months | |
Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1620k | 230k | Crisper screen (+1390k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W570 over the Sigma Quattro
W570 | Quattro |
---|
Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony W570
Quattro | W570 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W570 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Sigma Quattro provides exterior measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") along with a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Sony W570 has specifications of 91mm x 52mm x 19mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
See the Sigma Quattro versus Sony W570 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the Quattro compared to the W570.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the Quattro and W570 is 63 and 96 respectively.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W570 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing purely by looking at specs. The graphic below will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the Quattro and W570.
All in all, both cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Quattro featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF easier and the Sigma Quattro will give extra detail as a result of its extra 13MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more modern Quattro provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W570 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W570 Specifications
Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W570 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Sigma | Sony |
Model | Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W570 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Released | 2016-02-23 | 2011-01-06 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Dual TRUE III | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 29 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5424 x 3616 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Sigma SA | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.6-6.3 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 76 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,620k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | - | Clear Photo LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 2 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.8 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.70 m |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | - | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 625g (1.38 pounds) | 116g (0.26 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") | 91 x 52 x 19mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | BP-61 | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $738 | $159 |