Sigma Quattro vs Sony W650
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
96 Imaging
39 Features
32 Overall
36
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W650 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2016
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.6-6.3) lens
- 124g - 94 x 56 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W650 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Sigma Quattro versus Sony W650, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Sigma and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the Quattro (29MP) and W650 (16MP) and the Quattro (APS-C) and W650 (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Quattro was released 4 years later than the W650 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony W650 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short summation of how the Quattro scores versus the W650 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W650 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Sigma sd Quattro and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650. The complete galleries are viewable at Sigma Quattro Gallery and Sony W650 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony W650
Quattro | W650 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2016 | January 2012 | Fresher by 51 months | |
Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
Display resolution | 1620k | 230k | Crisper display (+1390k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W650 over the Sigma Quattro
W650 | Quattro |
---|
Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony W650
Quattro | W650 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W650 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Sigma Quattro provides exterior dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Sony W650 has sizing of 94mm x 56mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs).
Check the Sigma Quattro versus Sony W650 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the Quattro and the W650.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Quattro and W650 is 63 and 96 respectively.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W650 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizing just by viewing a spec sheet. The visual here may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Quattro and W650.
As you can see, both the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Quattro because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Sigma Quattro will result in more detail as a result of its extra 13MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images more aggressively. The fresher Quattro provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W650 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W650 Specifications
Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Sigma | Sony |
Model | Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2016-02-23 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Dual TRUE III | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 29 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5424 x 3616 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Sigma SA | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.6-6.3 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 76 | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,620k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | Clear Photo TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 2 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.8 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.70 m |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | - | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 625g (1.38 lbs) | 124g (0.27 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") | 94 x 56 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 photos |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BP-61 | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD/micro SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $738 | $140 |