Sigma Quattro vs Sony W690
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63


95 Imaging
39 Features
32 Overall
36
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W690 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Announced February 2016
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 142g - 94 x 56 x 22mm
- Revealed February 2012

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W690 Overview
The following is a thorough assessment of the Sigma Quattro versus Sony W690, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Sigma and Sony. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the Quattro (29MP) and W690 (16MP) and the Quattro (APS-C) and W690 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizes.

The Quattro was brought out 4 years after the W690 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony W690 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the Quattro scores versus the W690 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W690 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Sigma sd Quattro & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W690. The entire galleries are viewable at Sigma Quattro Gallery & Sony W690 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony W690
Quattro | W690 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2016 | ![]() | February 2012 | Newer by 49 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 1620k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+1390k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W690 over the Sigma Quattro
W690 | Quattro |
---|
Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony W690
Quattro | W690 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch screen |
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W690 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The Sigma Quattro has got external measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Sony W690 has measurements of 94mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Contrast the Sigma Quattro versus Sony W690 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the Quattro and the W690.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the Quattro and W690 is 63 and 95 respectively.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W690 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to envision the gap in sensor dimensions purely by looking through technical specs. The pic underneath should provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the Quattro and W690.
As you have seen, both cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The Quattro due to its bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Sigma Quattro will render greater detail having its extra 13MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The younger Quattro is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W690 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W690 Specifications
Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W690 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Sigma | Sony |
Model type | Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W690 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2016-02-23 | 2012-02-28 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Dual TRUE III | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 29 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5424 x 3616 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Sigma SA | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 76 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,620k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | ClearPhoto TFT LCD display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.8 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.30 m |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | - | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 625 grams (1.38 pounds) | 142 grams (0.31 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") | 94 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BP-61 | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $738 | $297 |