Clicky

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W690

Portability
63
Imaging
69
Features
56
Overall
63
Sigma sd Quattro front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W690 front
Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
32
Overall
36

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W690 Key Specs

Sigma Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 29MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Announced February 2016
Sony W690
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 142g - 94 x 56 x 22mm
  • Revealed February 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W690 Overview

The following is a thorough assessment of the Sigma Quattro versus Sony W690, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Sigma and Sony. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the Quattro (29MP) and W690 (16MP) and the Quattro (APS-C) and W690 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizes.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The Quattro was brought out 4 years after the W690 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony W690 being a Compact camera.

Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the Quattro scores versus the W690 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony W690

 Quattro W690 
RevealedFebruary 2016February 2012Newer by 49 months
Manual focus More accurate focusing
Screen resolution1620k230kClearer screen (+1390k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony W690 over the Sigma Quattro

 W690 Quattro 

Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony W690

 Quattro W690 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen dimensions
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch screen Neither contains Touch screen

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W690 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The Sigma Quattro has got external measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Sony W690 has measurements of 94mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).

Contrast the Sigma Quattro versus Sony W690 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the Quattro and the W690.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W690 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the Quattro and W690 is 63 and 95 respectively.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W690 top view buttons comparison

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W690 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, its hard to envision the gap in sensor dimensions purely by looking through technical specs. The pic underneath should provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the Quattro and W690.

As you have seen, both cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The Quattro due to its bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Sigma Quattro will render greater detail having its extra 13MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The younger Quattro is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W690 sensor size comparison

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W690 Screen and ViewFinder

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W690 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Sigma Quattro
Portrait photography with Sony W690
81
focusing manually
great megapixels (29 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports face detection focus
saves RAW formats
34
decent MP (16MP)
features face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Sigma Quattro Street photography advice
Sony W690 Street photography advice
59
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
environment proof
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
more heavy than competition (625 grams)
57
image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sigma Quattro Sports photography advice
Sony W690 Sports photography advice
70
great megapixels (29 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports tracking autofocus
environment proof
has phase detect auto focus
slow fps (3.8 fps)
lack of image stabilization
40
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
continuous shooting slow (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Sigma Quattro
Travel photography with Sony W690
55
environment proof
great megapixels (29 megapixels)
no Timelapse function
more heavy than competition (625g)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
68
decent MP (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (25mm)
great reach (250mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Sigma Quattro Landscape photography highlights
Sony W690 Landscape photography highlights
72
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Sigma SA mount)
pretty good screen size (3")
great megapixels (29MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
environment proof
lack of image stabilization
no Timelapse function
43
really wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
no manual exposure
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
does not have Timelapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Sigma Quattro Vlogging info
Sony W690 Vlogging info
22
supports face detection focus
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low ( pxls)
no external microphone support
more heavy than competition (625 grams)
31
really wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection autofocus
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
screen is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external microphone socket
Photography Glossary

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W690 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sigma Quattro and Sony W690
 Sigma sd QuattroSony Cyber-shot DSC-W690
General Information
Company Sigma Sony
Model type Sigma sd Quattro Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W690
Class Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2016-02-23 2012-02-28
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Chip Dual TRUE III BIONZ
Sensor type CMOS (Foveon X3) CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 23.5 x 15.6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 366.6mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 29 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 5424 x 3616 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 6400 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 9 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support Sigma SA fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-250mm (10.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.3-5.9
Macro focusing distance - 5cm
Amount of lenses 76 -
Focal length multiplier 1.5 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 1,620k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech - ClearPhoto TFT LCD display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.73x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 30 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 3.8 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 3.30 m
Flash settings no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution - 1280x720
Video file format - MPEG-4
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 625 grams (1.38 pounds) 142 grams (0.31 pounds)
Physical dimensions 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") 94 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 220 photos
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID BP-61 NP-BN
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo
Card slots 1 1
Price at launch $738 $297