Clicky

Sigma Quattro vs Sony WX220

Portability
63
Imaging
69
Features
56
Overall
63
Sigma sd Quattro front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 front
Portability
96
Imaging
43
Features
41
Overall
42

Sigma Quattro vs Sony WX220 Key Specs

Sigma Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 29MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Announced February 2016
Sony WX220
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 121g - 92 x 52 x 22mm
  • Announced February 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sigma Quattro vs Sony WX220 Overview

On this page, we are analyzing the Sigma Quattro vs Sony WX220, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Sigma and Sony. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the Quattro (29MP) and WX220 (18MP) and the Quattro (APS-C) and WX220 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor measurements.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The Quattro was launched 2 years after the WX220 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony WX220 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a simple summation of how the Quattro scores vs the WX220 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony WX220

 Quattro WX220 
AnnouncedFebruary 2016February 2014More modern by 25 months
Focus manually Dial accurate focusing
Display resolution1620k460kClearer display (+1160k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony WX220 over the Sigma Quattro

 WX220 Quattro 

Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony WX220

 Quattro WX220 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display measurements
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch display Lack of Touch display

Sigma Quattro vs Sony WX220 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Sigma Quattro features outside dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Sony WX220 has dimensions of 92mm x 52mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).

Compare the Sigma Quattro vs Sony WX220 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the Quattro against the WX220.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony WX220 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the Quattro and WX220 is 63 and 96 respectively.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony WX220 top view buttons comparison

Sigma Quattro vs Sony WX220 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very hard to envision the gap between sensor sizes simply by looking at technical specs. The pic underneath will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Quattro and WX220.

As you have seen, both cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The Quattro featuring a larger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Sigma Quattro will give you more detail utilizing its extra 11 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics more aggressively. The fresher Quattro will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony WX220 sensor size comparison

Sigma Quattro vs Sony WX220 Screen and ViewFinder

Sigma Quattro vs Sony WX220 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Sigma Quattro Portrait photography advice
Sony WX220 Portrait photography advice
81
has manual focus
sensor resolution is great (29MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
offers face detect focusing
saves RAW files
37
decent MP (18MP)
offers face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Sigma Quattro
Street photography with Sony WX220
59
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW files
environment sealing
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
heavier than competition (625g)
59
built in image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sigma Quattro Sports photography features
Sony WX220 Sports photography features
70
sensor resolution is great (29 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
offers tracking focus
environment sealing
supports phase detect AF
low frames per second (3.8 fps)
lack of image stabilization
46
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (18 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Sigma Quattro Travel photography highlights
Sony WX220 Travel photography highlights
55
environment sealing
sensor resolution is great (29MP)
no Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition (625 grams)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
69
decent MP (18MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (25mm)
long zoom (250mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Sigma Quattro Landscape photography info
Sony WX220 Landscape photography info
72
has manual focus
swap lenses (Sigma SA mount)
screen size is good (3")
sensor resolution is great (29MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW files
environment sealing
lack of image stabilization
no Time Lapse recording
44
rather wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (18 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
no manual mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
does not have Time Lapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Sigma Quattro Vlogging features
Sony WX220 Vlogging features
22
offers face detect focusing
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low ( resolution)
no mic support
heavier than competition (625g)
34
rather wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have mic support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sigma Quattro vs Sony WX220 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sigma Quattro and Sony WX220
 Sigma sd QuattroSony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220
General Information
Make Sigma Sony
Model Sigma sd Quattro Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220
Class Advanced Mirrorless Ultracompact
Announced 2016-02-23 2014-02-12
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Dual TRUE III Bionz X
Sensor type CMOS (Foveon X3) BSI-CMOS
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 23.5 x 15.6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 366.6mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 29MP 18MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 5424 x 3616 4896 x 3672
Maximum native ISO 6400 12800
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens mount Sigma SA fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-250mm (10.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.3-5.9
Total lenses 76 -
Focal length multiplier 1.5 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 1,620 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.73x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30s 4s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1600s
Continuous shutter rate 3.8fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash 3.70 m (with Auto ISO)
Flash settings no built-in flash Auto, on, slow synchro, off, advanced
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution - 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 625 grams (1.38 lbs) 121 grams (0.27 lbs)
Physical dimensions 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") 92 x 52 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 210 images
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model BP-61 NP-BN
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single Single
Launch price $738 $198