Sigma Quattro vs Sony WX220
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
96 Imaging
43 Features
41 Overall
42
Sigma Quattro vs Sony WX220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Announced February 2016
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 52 x 22mm
- Announced February 2014
Sigma Quattro vs Sony WX220 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Sigma Quattro vs Sony WX220, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Sigma and Sony. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the Quattro (29MP) and WX220 (18MP) and the Quattro (APS-C) and WX220 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Quattro was launched 2 years after the WX220 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony WX220 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a simple summation of how the Quattro scores vs the WX220 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony WX220 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Sigma sd Quattro and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220. The complete galleries are available at Sigma Quattro Gallery and Sony WX220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony WX220
Quattro | WX220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2016 | February 2014 | More modern by 25 months | |
Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display resolution | 1620k | 460k | Clearer display (+1160k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony WX220 over the Sigma Quattro
WX220 | Quattro |
---|
Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony WX220
Quattro | WX220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Sigma Quattro vs Sony WX220 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Sigma Quattro features outside dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Sony WX220 has dimensions of 92mm x 52mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Compare the Sigma Quattro vs Sony WX220 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the Quattro against the WX220.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the Quattro and WX220 is 63 and 96 respectively.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony WX220 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to envision the gap between sensor sizes simply by looking at technical specs. The pic underneath will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Quattro and WX220.
As you have seen, both cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The Quattro featuring a larger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Sigma Quattro will give you more detail utilizing its extra 11 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics more aggressively. The fresher Quattro will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony WX220 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sigma Quattro vs Sony WX220 Specifications
Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Sigma | Sony |
Model | Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2016-02-23 | 2014-02-12 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Dual TRUE III | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 29MP | 18MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5424 x 3616 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Sigma SA | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Total lenses | 76 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,620 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.8fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.70 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, on, slow synchro, off, advanced |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | - | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 625 grams (1.38 lbs) | 121 grams (0.27 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") | 92 x 52 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 210 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BP-61 | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $738 | $198 |