Sigma Quattro vs Sony A33
63 Imaging
68 Features
56 Overall
63
67 Imaging
53 Features
80 Overall
63
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A33 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2016
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 500g - 124 x 92 x 85mm
- Introduced August 2010
- Later Model is Sony A35
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Sigma Quattro vs Sony A33 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Sigma Quattro versus Sony A33, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Sigma and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the Quattro (29MP) and A33 (14MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (APS-C).
Photography GlossaryThe Quattro was released 5 years later than the A33 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A33 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the Quattro matches up against the A33 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Sigma Quattro vs Sony A33 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Sigma sd Quattro & Sony SLT-A33. The complete galleries are available at Sigma Quattro Gallery & Sony A33 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony A33
| Quattro | A33 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2016 |  | August 2010 | Fresher by 67 months |
| Screen resolution | 1620k |  | 921k | Clearer screen (+699k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A33 over the Sigma Quattro
| A33 | Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony A33
| Quattro | A33 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurement |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A33 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Sigma Quattro comes with external measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") with a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Sony A33 has dimensions of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs).
Check the Sigma Quattro versus Sony A33 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the Quattro against the A33.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the Quattro and A33 is 63 and 67 respectively.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A33 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizing simply by checking a spec sheet. The graphic underneath may offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Quattro and A33.
As you can see, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can count on the Sigma Quattro to resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 15 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots way more aggressively. The more modern Quattro provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A33 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A33 Specifications
| Sigma sd Quattro | Sony SLT-A33 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Sigma | Sony |
| Model | Sigma sd Quattro | Sony SLT-A33 |
| Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Revealed | 2016-02-23 | 2010-08-24 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Dual TRUE III | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 29 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 5424 x 3616 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 15 |
| Cross focus points | - | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Sigma SA | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Available lenses | 76 | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 1,620k dots | 921k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | 1,150k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.8 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 10.00 m (@ ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
| Max video resolution | - | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 625 gr (1.38 pounds) | 500 gr (1.10 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") | 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 70 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 591 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 pictures |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BP-61 | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $738 | $230 |