Sigma Quattro vs Sony A55
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
67 Imaging
56 Features
80 Overall
65
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A55 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Launched February 2016
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 500g - 124 x 92 x 85mm
- Released August 2010
- Refreshed by Sony A57
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A55 Overview
In this write-up, we are reviewing the Sigma Quattro versus Sony A55, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Sigma and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the Quattro (29MP) and A55 (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor size (APS-C).
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Quattro was unveiled 5 years after the A55 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A55 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going straight into a thorough comparison, below is a short highlight of how the Quattro grades against the A55 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A55 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Sigma sd Quattro & Sony SLT-A55. The full galleries are provided at Sigma Quattro Gallery & Sony A55 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony A55
Quattro | A55 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2016 | August 2010 | Newer by 67 months | |
Display resolution | 1620k | 921k | Sharper display (+699k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A55 over the Sigma Quattro
A55 | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony A55
Quattro | A55 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display size | |
Touch friendly display | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A55 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you need to consider its weight and size. The Sigma Quattro offers outer dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") with a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Sony A55 has specifications of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") along with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs).
Analyze the Sigma Quattro versus Sony A55 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the Quattro and the A55.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the Quattro and A55 is 63 and 67 respectively.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A55 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions just by reading specs. The pic here may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the Quattro and A55.
All in all, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Sigma Quattro to offer you more detail having an extra 13MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a little more aggressively. The more recent Quattro is going to have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A55 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A55 Specifications
Sigma sd Quattro | Sony SLT-A55 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Sigma | Sony |
Model type | Sigma sd Quattro | Sony SLT-A55 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2016-02-23 | 2010-08-24 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Dual TRUE III | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 29MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5424 x 3616 | 4912 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 15 |
Cross type focus points | - | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Sigma SA | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Amount of lenses | 76 | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,620 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 1,150 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.8fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 10.00 m (@ ISO 100) |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
Highest video resolution | - | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 625 gr (1.38 lb) | 500 gr (1.10 lb) |
Dimensions | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") | 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 816 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 380 images |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BP-61 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $738 | $800 |