Sony A7S II vs Sony H55
68 Imaging
60 Features
76 Overall
66
92 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
Sony A7S II vs Sony H55 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400 (Boost to 409600)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 627g - 127 x 96 x 60mm
- Revealed October 2015
- Earlier Model is Sony A7S
- Successor is Sony A7S III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 200g - 103 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced June 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Sony A7S II vs Sony H55: A Detailed Camera Comparison from Field to Studio
Choosing between two cameras as divergent as the Sony Alpha A7S II and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55 is no trivial task. Both hail from Sony’s rich imaging lineage but cater to vastly different user segments and photographic priorities. Having extensively tested thousands of cameras across genres, I’m excited to take you through an in-depth comparison, highlighting where each camera shines and where compromises creep in. We’ll navigate technical specs, real-world performance, and practical usability for various photographic disciplines - from landscape vistas to fast-moving wildlife, and from studio portraiture to weekend street snaps.
Let’s buckle up and dive right in.
Understanding the DNA: Pro Mirrorless vs Small Sensor Compact
At first glance, these two cameras couldn’t be more different physically or philosophically.
-
Sony Alpha A7S II (A7S II): Introduced in 2015 as a professional-grade full-frame mirrorless camera, the A7S II was a game-changer for videographers and low-light shooters alike. It’s part of Sony’s acclaimed Alpha series, sporting a sizable 35.6x23.8mm full-frame CMOS sensor, a robust Bionz X processor, and a focus on high ISO performance.
-
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55 (H55): Released in 2010, the H55 is a small-sensor compact designed primarily for casual users prioritizing pocket portability and simplicity over professional flexibility. It uses a tiny 1/2.3" (6.17×4.55mm) CCD sensor and a fixed 10x optical zoom lens.

The difference in body sizes - the A7S II’s SLR-style mirrorless body at 127x96x60 mm and 627 grams versus the tiny 103x58x29 mm, 200 grams H55 - foreshadows the performance gap. But there’s much more than mere size at play. Let’s explore this disparity’s impact on lens options, sensor performance, and shooting experience.
Sensor and Image Quality: The Crown Jewel of the A7S II
This segment is where the A7S II flexes its technical muscles.

The A7S II’s full-frame sensor measuring 847.28 mm² dwarfs that of the H55 with only 28.07 mm² - nearly 30 times smaller sensor area. The implication? More light gathering capability, significantly better noise control, and a wider dynamic range.
Some hard numbers from DxOMark affirm this:
- Dynamic Range: 13.3 EV for A7S II vs. untested for H55 (yet consumer-grade compacts typically fall short, around 7-8 EV)
- Color Depth: 23.6 bits vs untested
- Low-Light ISO Performance: DxOMark low-light ISO score of 2993 (superior) vs untested
The A7S II’s 12.2-megapixel resolution might seem modest in today’s megapixel arms race. However, its sensor is optimized for maximum sensitivity rather than sheer pixel count, with a maximum native ISO of 102400 - extendable up to a staggering 409600 - which is phenomenal for shooting in near-darkness or astro photography.
In contrast, the H55’s 14 MP CCD sensor maxes out at ISO 3200, a more limited range, and despite a higher pixel count, its smaller sensor size results in poorer noise performance and narrower dynamic range.
In practice: Images from the A7S II are cleaner with more detail retention in shadows and highlights, while the H55 images show more noise and less gradation.
This makes the A7S II the clear choice for:
- Night and astrophotography (where low noise matters)
- Landscape shooting requiring extensive dynamic range to capture skies and shadow details
- Professional work demanding high-quality raw files
While the H55 can produce respectable daylight JPEGs, it is handicapped by sensor size in demanding conditions.
Lens Ecosystem and Versatility: Flexibility vs Simplicity
A camera is only as good as the lenses you pair it with.
The A7S II uses Sony's popular E-mount lens system, loaded with over 120 lens options from a wide range of manufacturers - Sony native G Master, Zeiss primes, Sigma ART, Tamron, and more.
This ecosystem lets photographers tailor their setup from ultra-wide landscapes to super-telephoto wildlife shots or ultra-fast primes for portraits, macro, and video.
In contrast, the H55 has a fixed 25-250mm equivalent zoom lens (f/3.5-5.5). It cannot accept interchangeable lenses, which limits compositional creativity and optical performance.
In essence:
- A7S II = endless creative possibilities, from sweeping landscapes to 4K cinema-quality video.
- H55 = straightforward, carry-anywhere all-in-one, but confined in optical flexibility.
Handling, Ergonomics, and Interface: Robust Pro Control vs Pocket-Friendly Convenience
Ergonomics often go overlooked but can make or break a shooting experience.

The A7S II has a large, solid magnesium alloy body with a well-placed grip, customizable buttons, a tilting 3-inch LCD with 1.2 million pixels, and a sharp 2.35 million pixel electronic viewfinder (EVF) offering 100% frame coverage and 0.78x magnification. Its 5-axis sensor-based image stabilization reduces blur in low light without requiring specialized lenses.

Meanwhile, the H55 is ultra-compact and lightweight, designed for casual shooters who prioritize simple point-and-shoot realism over manual control. It lacks an EVF and features a fixed 3-inch LCD with just 230k pixels, making framing under bright sun more challenging. Its controls are minimal, with no manual exposure modes, aperture priority, or shutter priority options.
This leads to:
- The A7S II excelling in tactile control efficiency and comfort, especially for long photo sessions.
- The H55 being convenient for casual snapshots but tiring for extended use or manual photography.
Autofocus Systems: Precision and Tracking Versus Basic Point & Shoot
Autofocus (AF) is crucial - especially for wildlife, sports, and street photography.
The A7S II employs a hybrid contrast-detection AF system with 169 AF points. It supports face detection, eye detection (an early version), tracking AF, and continuous AF, allowing reliable focus under challenging conditions and subjects.
The H55, by comparison, relies on a basic contrast-detect AF system with only 9 focus points and no continuous/ tracking AF features or face detection. It is fine for static scenes but struggles to lock focus on moving subjects.
In real-world testing:
- The A7S II shows fast, accurate autofocus even in dim light and with fast-moving animals or athletes.
- The H55 is better suited to still subjects, like family photos or daylight street scenes, but prone to hunting in low contrast or movement.
Burst Shooting and Buffer Performance: Capturing Action
Burst shooting speed impacts sports and wildlife photographers who want to capture decisive moments.
- A7S II offers a 5 fps continuous shooting rate, complemented by its large buffer that allows shooting dozens of RAW frames without slowdown.
- H55 is faster superficially at 10 fps but only in JPEG mode and low resolution. In practical usability, its small buffer means limited continuous shooting depth.
This gap makes the A7S II more dependable when tracking fast-paced action.
Video Capabilities: Pioneering 4K in a Mirrorless Body
For videographers, the A7S II remains influential.
It offers:
- 4K UHD video recording at 30p and 24p in XAVC S or AVCHD codecs
- Full HD at up to 120p for high-speed slow motion
- 5-axis image stabilization, helping reduce handheld shake
- Microphone and headphone jacks for audio monitoring
- Profiles and gamma options geared towards professional grading workflows
The H55, quite conversely, provides only:
- 720p video at 30fps in simple MPEG-4 format
- No external audio inputs
- No stabilization during video
In short, the A7S II is a bona fide cinematic tool, while the H55’s video is limited to casual use.
Battery Life and Storage: Powering Pro Workflows vs Casual Shooting
Battery life can seriously impact field use.
- The A7S II uses the NP-FW50 battery with a rated 370 shots per charge, which is modest by DSLR standards but can be supplemented with grips or external power packs.
- H55 uses NP-BG1 battery, with unspecified but generally shorter lifespan due to compact design and power constraints.
Storage-wise, both accept SD cards, but the A7S II also supports Sony’s Memory Stick Pro Duo variants and offers a single card slot.
Durability and Weather Sealing
- The A7S II features full weather sealing, made for rough conditions - rain, dust, and moderate environmental hazards.
- The H55 lacks any significant environmental sealing - it’s for fair-weather family outings and indoor shoots.
This makes the A7S II a trusted companion for travel photographers venturing into the wild.
Image Samples and Real-World Comparison
To put our findings in visual perspective, examine these side-by-side sample images:
The A7S II’s images reveal fine detail, natural skin tones in portraits, creamy bokeh, and excellent color gradations. The dynamic range effectively holds shadows and highlights through complex lighting.
The H55 performs well in bright light but lacks depth in detail and struggles under low light, with evident noise and less controlled highlights.
Notably, macro shots and wildlife images show appreciable softness from the H55 lens, emphasizing the advantage of interchangeable top-tier glass on the A7S II.
Genre-Specific Performance: Mapping Cameras to Photography Types
Breaking down performance by genre:
| Photography Type | Sony A7S II | Sony H55 | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Portraits | Excellent | Fair | A7S II offers superior skin tone rendition and eye AF |
| Landscape | Excellent | Moderate | Dynamic range and resolution favor A7S II |
| Wildlife | Very good | Poor | AF tracking and lens flexibility far outclass H55 |
| Sports | Good | Poor | Fast AF and burst rate on A7S II; H55 unsuitable |
| Street | Good | Moderate | H55’s small size helps but lower image quality |
| Macro | Very good | Fair | Focus precision and lens options favor A7S II |
| Night/Astro | Excellent | Poor | High ISO performance distinguishes A7S II |
| Video | Excellent | Poor | 4K capabilities and stabilization in A7S II unmatched |
| Travel | Very good | Good | H55’s portability wins but limited performance |
| Professional | Excellent | Not suited | Robust file formats, reliability for workflows |
Overall Performance Ratings
The A7S II scores an impressive 85 on DxOmark, demonstrating its industry-standard image quality, while the H55 is untested but expected to perform in the consumer compact range.
Price-to-Performance Analysis: Investment vs Convenience
At an MSR price around $2,766, the A7S II commands a serious investment suited for professionals or enthusiasts aiming for high-quality imaging and video production.
Conversely, the H55’s price near $235 targets budget-conscious consumers or casual photographers prioritizing simplicity and portability.
This price gap reflects differences in technology generation, sensor size, and intended use case. If your budget allows and you demand image excellence, the A7S II pays off. For point-and-shoot convenience with modest expectations, the H55 fits.
Concluding Thoughts: Who Should Own What?
Choose the Sony A7S II if:
- You are a professional or advanced enthusiast focused on low-light, video, portrait, landscape, or wildlife photography.
- You crave the flexibility of interchangeable lenses and high-end manual controls.
- You requiere weather-sealed durability and solid battery life for demanding conditions.
- You want future-proof 4K video and professional audio connectivity.
- You value image quality uncompromised by sensor size or outdated tech.
Choose the Sony H55 if:
- You are a casual user or beginner seeking an easy, budget compact camera.
- Portability and ease-of-use outweigh image quality or advanced features.
- You want a simple zoom lens covering a broad focal range for general snapshots.
- Your photo sessions are typically in daylight and involve static subjects.
- You prefer a camera that fits in a pocket without fuss.
Final Verdict
While it’s fascinating to directly compare these two Sonys, they inhabit almost opposite photographic universes. The A7S II remains a formidable full-frame mirrorless powerhouse optimized for creators who need sophisticated tools. The H55 represents affordable snapshot simplicity, befitting family albums and travel memories at a glance.
Understanding your priorities and shooting style is key. If craft, image quality, and creative options are paramount, the A7S II will earn your respect over many years. But if convenience, budget, and casual photography are your chief aims, the H55 won’t disappoint.
Hope this deep dive helps you navigate your choices with clarity. After all, the best camera is the one that finds its way to your hands and inspires your best work.
Happy shooting!
If you have questions on specific photographic scenarios or further lens suggestions for the A7S II, drop me a line - I’m happy to help!
Sony A7S II vs Sony H55 Specifications
| Sony Alpha A7S II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Sony | Sony |
| Model type | Sony Alpha A7S II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55 |
| Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2015-10-12 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Bionz X | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Full frame | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 35.6 x 23.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 847.3mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4240 x 2832 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 102400 | 3200 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 409600 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Min boosted ISO | 50 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 169 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Sony E | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Available lenses | 121 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 1,229 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,359 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.78x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.80 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Slow Syncro, Off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 4K (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p [60-100Mbps]), Full HD (1920 x 1080 @ 120p/60p/60i/30p/24p [50-100Mbps]), 720p (30p [16Mbps]) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S | MPEG-4 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 627 gr (1.38 pounds) | 200 gr (0.44 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 127 x 96 x 60mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.4") | 103 x 58 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 85 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 2993 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 370 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-FW50 | NP-BG1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures)) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
| Time lapse feature | With downloadable app | |
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo/ PRO HG-Duo, SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $2,767 | $235 |