Sony A7S vs YI M1
77 Imaging
59 Features
73 Overall
64


87 Imaging
59 Features
66 Overall
61
Sony A7S vs YI M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 409600
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 489g - 127 x 94 x 48mm
- Released April 2014
- Newer Model is Sony A7S II
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 350g - 114 x 64 x 34mm
- Introduced September 2016

Sony A7S vs YI M1: A Hands-On Comparison for the Discerning Photographer
When it comes to selecting a mirrorless camera, the choice can often be as stark as comparing a seasoned pro to an enthusiastic beginner. Today, I’ve taken a deep dive into two very different beasts: the Sony Alpha A7S, a professional full-frame mirrorless camera heralded for its low-light prowess, against the surprisingly capable YI M1, an affordable entry-level mirrorless camera sporting the Micro Four Thirds system.
These cameras were released two years apart but targeted vastly different users. Through rigorous hands-on testing across multiple photography disciplines - portrait, landscape, wildlife, sports, macro, night, video and travel - I’ve dissected their capabilities, strengths, and compromises so you can buy with confidence.
Let’s start by sizing up their physicality and ergonomics.
First Impressions: Size, Weight, and Handling That Matter
The first tactile encounter with a camera often sets the tone for the shooting experience, especially for prolonged shoots.
The Sony A7S sports a classic SLR-style mirrorless body, measuring 127 x 94 x 48 mm and tipping the scales at 489 g. Its robust magnesium alloy construction and weather sealing lend confidence for outdoor shoots and unpredictable conditions, traits I deeply appreciate while trekking or shooting landscapes in the rain.
In contrast, the YI M1 is a compact rangefinder-style mirrorless camera, smaller and lighter at 114 x 64 x 34 mm and 350 g. While it lacks weather sealing, its light weight and slim profile make it particularly discrete and travel-friendly. However, in my experience, the smaller grip can become less comfortable during extended use, especially with heavier lenses.
The ergonomics reflect their intended audiences - Sony’s offering feels like a tool designed to be held all day, whereas the YI M1 favors portability and casual usage.
Control Layout and Top-Plate Design: Intuitive Operation or Minimalist?
A camera’s control layout can make or break the shooting flow, so I inspected both cameras’ top view designs to evaluate usability under a quick shooting scenario.
The Sony A7S provides physical dials for mode, exposure compensation, and control wheels positioned conveniently. Its dedicated buttons for video recording, ISO adjustment, and custom functions reflect the demands of professional photographers who need rapid access.
Conversely, the YI M1 offers a minimalist approach - its top houses a mode dial but lacks physical exposure compensation control. I found this slower for making quick adjustments, as many controls depend on touchscreen input on the rear LCD.
For street, travel, and event photographers who shoot fast, the tactile controls on the Sony feel indispensable. But the YI’s simplicity will appeal to beginners or those transitioning from smartphone photography.
Sensor Size and Image Quality: Full Frame Vs Micro Four Thirds
Sensor technology is at the heart of any camera’s imaging prowess. Here’s where the two diverge sharply.
The Sony A7S features a 12.2-megapixel full-frame Exmor CMOS sensor sized 35.8 x 23.9 mm, optimized for remarkable low-light performance, dynamic range, and color depth. Despite the lower resolution, its large pixel size yields cleaner images at high ISOs - a crucial factor in astrophotography and dim indoor shooting.
In contrast, the YI M1 uses a 20-megapixel Four Thirds sensor sized 17.3 x 13 mm. While its higher resolution produces detailed images in well-lit conditions, the smaller sensor area limits low-light performance and dynamic range compared to the Sony.
During my tests, landscapes and portraits benefited from A7S’s superior tonality and highlight retention. Meanwhile, the YI’s images were respectable but showed noticeably more noise at ISO 1600+ indoors or in shadow areas.
In sum, if image quality - especially in challenging light - is your priority, the A7S’s full-frame sensor is the clear winner.
Viewing and Interface Experience: Electronic Viewfinder and LCD Screen
Neither camera sidelines usability, but their approaches differ.
The Sony A7S features a tilting 3-inch LCD with 1.23 million dots and a bright 2.36-million dot electronic viewfinder (EVF) covering 100% frame with 0.71x magnification. In bright outdoor conditions, I found this EVF invaluable for composing and reviewing images without glare.
The YI M1 lacks an EVF altogether, relying on a fixed 3-inch touchscreen LCD with 1.04 million dots. The touchscreen interface supports intuitive focus point selection and menu navigation, which might appeal to users accustomed to smartphone-like interaction.
However, when shooting fast-moving subjects or in bright sunlight, I missed the A7S’s EVF on the YI. Photographers coming from DSLR backgrounds will likely feel the Sony’s viewfinder a must-have tool.
Autofocus System and Performance: Speed and Accuracy in Real Life
Autofocus (AF) often separates a missed moment from a captured one, so I tested both cameras on multiple fronts: tracking, face detection, and low-light focus.
The A7S employs a 25-point contrast-detection AF system with face detection and continuous AF options. While it lacks phase-detection AF points, in practice I found its AF surprisingly responsive and accurate, especially in video mode. The eye-detection AF worked well for portraits, though it’s less sophisticated than in later Sony models.
The YI M1 impressively houses 81 contrast-based AF points and touch AF capabilities. It supports face detection but lacks continuous tracking performance. In static portrait situations, its AF performed well, but when tracking moving subjects like in sports or wildlife photography, it struggled and suffered from hunting.
For wildlife and sports photographers, the Sony offers more reliable AF basics, but neither camera matches the best phase-detection systems available today.
Burst Shooting and Shutter Speeds: Capturing Fast Action
Continuous shooting speed can influence your ability to capture decisive moments.
Both cameras offer a 5 fps continuous shooting rate, generally sufficient for casual action photography, but not top-tier by today’s professional standards.
The Sony provides shutter speeds from 30 seconds up to 1/8000 sec, lending versatility for long exposures or freezing fast motion. The YI M1’s shutter range is 60 seconds to 1/4000 sec, which limits the ability to stop very fast action or use ultra-wide apertures in daylight without ND filters.
In use, I found the Sony’s shutter speed range important for night photography and creative flexibility.
Build Quality and Weather Resistance: Ready for the Elements?
The Sony A7S benefits from magnesium alloy body construction and comprehensive weather sealing, making it a rugged choice for outdoor photographers who shoot in mist, rain or dusty environments.
The YI M1 lacks environmental sealing and uses polycarbonate materials, which means it demands more care in adverse conditions.
For landscapes, adventure travel, and wildlife photography, the Sony’s robustness is a major asset.
Lens Ecosystem Compatibility: Versatility and Future-Proofing
A camera body’s potential is closely tied to lens availability.
The Sony uses the E-mount system, compatible with over 120 lenses from Sony and third parties like Sigma and Tamron. This extensive selection covers all photography genres - from ultra-wide angles to super-telephoto lenses for sports and wildlife, plus excellent native primes for portraiture and macro work.
On the other hand, the YI M1 employs the Micro Four Thirds mount, supported by over 100 lenses from Olympus, Panasonic, and others. While the sensor’s smaller size impacts focal lengths (2.1x crop factor), the system offers lightweight, compact lenses that suit travel and street photography.
My experience is that Sony’s ecosystem is more comprehensive and geared toward professional use, but Micro Four Thirds shines in portability and budget-conscious lens choices.
Battery Life and Storage Options: Reliability on the Go
Sony’s A7S uses the NP-FW50 battery, rated for approximately 360 shots per charge, which is modest and required frequent spares for long days in the field.
The YI M1 impresses with its rating of 450 shots per battery charge, better suited for casual users and travel photographers who may be away from charging options.
Both accept SD/SDHC/SDXC cards, but Sony also supports Memory Stick Duo variants. Neither camera supports dual card slots, so memory management is vital for professional workflows.
Video Capabilities: 4K Quality and Audio Controls
Video is a crucial consideration for hybrid shooters today.
Sony’s A7S shoots 4K UHD video at 30p in XAVC S format, with external microphone and headphone jacks - a feature I valued for precise audio monitoring during interviews or film projects.
It also offers Full HD recording at 60p and 120fps slow motion in 720p for creative effects. Despite lacking in-body image stabilization, the A7S’s video quality is superb, making it a favorite for indie filmmakers.
The YI M1 shoots 4K up to 30p in MOV H.264, but lacks microphone and headphone ports, limiting audio control options. While the video quality is decent for entry-level creators, the absence of pro features might be a significant limitation.
Specialized Photography Disciplines: Where Each Camera Excels
Let’s now analyze how both cameras perform in various photographic genres based on my rigorous field tests and user feedback.
Portrait Photography
- Sony A7S: Large sensor and pleasing bokeh control enable beautiful skin tone rendition and subject separation. Eye detection AF works reliably for focused eyes.
- YI M1: Good resolution helps with sharpness but shallower depth of field control is limited by smaller sensor and lens choices.
Landscape Photography
- Sony A7S: Excellent dynamic range preserves highlight and shadow details. Weather sealing and robust body make it ideal for rugged landscapes.
- YI M1: Decent resolution but lacks robust features for extreme conditions; sensor limits low light dynamic range.
Wildlife Photography
- Sony A7S: Moderate AF performance and solid burst speed allow reasonable wildlife capture with telephoto lenses.
- YI M1: SLower autofocus tracking hinders wildlife shooting. Limited shutter speed range restricts versatility.
Sports Photography
- Sony A7S: Reliable for slower-paced sports; continuous AF and 5 fps adequate but not professional-level speed.
- YI M1: Not recommended due to limited AF tracking and shutter speed.
Street Photography
- Sony A7S: Bulky size is a downside, but excellent low-light capabilities help capture candid moments at night.
- YI M1: Lightweight, discreet and touchscreen ease white balance and focus; ideal for casual street shooters.
Macro Photography
- Neither camera offers focus bracketing or stacking. Lens selection favors Sony, but YI’s lightweight system is more portable for macro fieldwork.
Night and Astro Photography
- Sony A7S: Outstanding high ISO and long exposure capabilities make it a go-to for astro and night sky imaging.
- YI M1: Limited ISO performance and exposure range reduce night shooting effectiveness.
Video Production
- Sony A7S: Professional quality 4K video, audio jacks, and neutral profiles suit filmmakers.
- YI M1: Decent 4K output but lacks pro video gear integration.
Travel Photography
- Sony A7S: Versatile but heavier and bulkier for travel.
- YI M1: Perfect lightweight companion, especially if you prioritize size and convenience.
Professional Work
- The Sony is clearly geared toward professional applications with raw processing options, reliability, and expansive ecosystem integration.
- The YI M1 targets budget-conscious enthusiasts or beginners learning DSLR-style photography.
Sample Images: Real Shoot Comparison
Here you can see side-by-side examples from each camera showcasing landscape detail, portrait skin tone rendition, and low-light noise performance.
Overall Performance Scores and Ratings
Drawing on DXOMark scores, user reviews, and my own extensive testing:
- Sony A7S: DXO Overall Score 87, color depth 23.9 bits, dynamic range 13.2 EV, low-light ISO 3702
- YI M1: Not tested by DXOMark but generally recognized as solid entry mirrorless with good image quality for price.
Genre-Specific Strengths and Weaknesses
A further breakdown by photography type:
- The Sony leads in low light, video, and professional use.
- The YI M1 shines in daylight, street, and travel shooting for beginner users.
Summary: Which Camera Should You Choose?
Sony Alpha A7S
Pros:
- Exceptional low-light and high ISO performance
- Full-frame sensor with wide dynamic range
- Professional video features with 4K and audio ports
- Robust weather sealing and build quality
- Extensive lens ecosystem
- Comfortable, tactile controls and EVF
Cons:
- Older 12 MP resolution limits cropping and ultra-high detail
- No in-body image stabilization
- Larger, heavier, and more expensive
- Moderate battery life
Best for: Professionals and enthusiasts needing high-quality low-light stills and video, landscape and night shooters, and those investing in a robust kit for serious work.
YI M1
Pros:
- Affordable price point under $350
- Higher resolution 20 MP sensor
- Lightweight and compact body
- Touchscreen interface for intuitive control
- Good daylight image quality and colors
- Supports 4K video recording
Cons:
- No EVF, relying on rear LCD only
- Limited low-light and dynamic range performance
- No weather sealing
- Relatively slow AF tracking for action photography
- No microphone/headphone jacks for video
- Minimal physical controls, less intuitive for fast adjustments
Best for: Beginners and hobbyists seeking an affordable, easy-to-use mirrorless camera with solid image quality in daylight, perfect for travel, street, and casual portrait shooting.
Final Thoughts and Buying Recommendations
From my extensive hands-on experience, the Sony A7S remains a specialized tool excelling in low-light and video-centric professional work. If you shoot often in challenging lighting or need pro features, it’s worth the premium investment. Its ergonomics, sensor, and video capabilities keep it relevant years after launch.
On the opposite end, the YI M1 delivers excellent bang for your buck and provides a very capable stepping stone into mirrorless photography without the intimidation or expense of pro gear. For users prioritizing travel lightness and straightforward operation, the M1 is a compelling choice.
Be sure you factor in your shooting style, subjects, and budget. For portraits with dreamy bokeh and smooth skin tones, landscapes demanding dynamic range, or video requiring professional audio interfacing, the Sony A7S has the edge. Meanwhile, street photographers, vloggers on a budget, or casual travelers may delight in the YI M1’s ease and portability.
I hope this deep comparison helps you make an informed decision - you deserve a camera that fits your creative vision and practical needs!
If you want to probe further into any photography style or potential accessories pairing for these cameras, I’m happy to provide more insights from my lab and fieldwork experience.
Sony A7S vs YI M1 Specifications
Sony Alpha A7S | YI M1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Sony | YI |
Model type | Sony Alpha A7S | YI M1 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2014-04-06 | 2016-09-19 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Bionz X | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 35.8 x 23.9mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 855.6mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4240 x 2832 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 409600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 25 | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Sony E | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 121 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,230k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,359k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.71x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Red-Eye Slow |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160, XAVC S 1080 60p(50Mbps), 30p (50Mbps), 24p (50Mbps). 720 120p (50Mbps). AVCHD 60p (28Mbps), 60i (24Mbps/17Mbps), 24p (24Mbps/17Mbps) | 4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 75 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 4096x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 489 gr (1.08 lbs) | 350 gr (0.77 lbs) |
Dimensions | 127 x 94 x 48mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 1.9") | 114 x 64 x 34mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 87 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.9 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 3702 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photographs | 450 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-FW50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures)) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | With downloadable app | |
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $1,998 | $320 |