Clicky

Sony A200 vs Sony NEX-3N

Portability
66
Imaging
50
Features
38
Overall
45
Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 front
 
Sony Alpha NEX-3N front
Portability
89
Imaging
58
Features
52
Overall
55

Sony A200 vs Sony NEX-3N Key Specs

Sony A200
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
  • Released July 2008
  • Updated by Sony A230
Sony NEX-3N
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
  • Introduced February 2013
  • Older Model is Sony NEX-F3
  • Refreshed by Sony a5000
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Sony A200 vs Sony NEX-3N Overview

Here is a complete review of the Sony A200 and Sony NEX-3N, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and they are both offered by Sony. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the A200 (10MP) and NEX-3N (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (APS-C).

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The A200 was manufactured 5 years before the NEX-3N and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony NEX-3N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise view of how the A200 grades against the NEX-3N in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Sony NEX-3N

 A200 NEX-3N 

Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Sony A200

 NEX-3N A200 
IntroducedFebruary 2013July 2008Fresher by 56 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kSharper display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Sony A200 and Sony NEX-3N

 A200 NEX-3N 
Manually focus More exact focusing
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch display Neither provides Touch display

Sony A200 vs Sony NEX-3N Physical Comparison

When you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and proportions. The Sony A200 provides outer dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs) while the Sony NEX-3N has measurements of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).

Compare the Sony A200 and Sony NEX-3N in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the A200 and the NEX-3N.

Sony A200 vs Sony NEX-3N size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the A200 and NEX-3N is 66 and 89 respectively.

Sony A200 vs Sony NEX-3N top view buttons comparison

Sony A200 vs Sony NEX-3N Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be tough to visualize the difference in sensor sizing simply by going through technical specs. The photograph below may give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the A200 and NEX-3N.

As you have seen, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Sony NEX-3N to show more detail due to its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a little more aggressively. The older A200 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Sony A200 vs Sony NEX-3N sensor size comparison

Sony A200 vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and ViewFinder

Sony A200 vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Sony A200 Portrait photography highlights
Sony NEX-3N Portrait photography highlights
54
you can focus manually
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
does not have liveview
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
66
you can focus manually
MP count decent (16MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
cannot use external flash
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Sony A200 as a Street photography camera
Sony NEX-3N as a Street photography camera
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
fixed screen
77
screen tilts
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
no image stabilization
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Sony A200 Sports photography information
Sony NEX-3N Sports photography information
50
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports phase detect auto focus
does not have liveview
low frames per second (3.0 frames/s)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
54
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
better than average battery (480 per charge)
painfully slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
has no phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Sony A200 Travel photography advice
Sony NEX-3N Travel photography advice
46
has built in flash
missing Time Lapse function
sensor resolution low (10MP)
does not posses selfie friendly display
71
better than average battery (480 shots)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Sony A200 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony NEX-3N as a Landscape photography camera
54
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
does not have liveview
sensor resolution low (10MP)
missing Time Lapse function
70
you can focus manually
change lenses (Sony E mount)
nice screen size (3")
MP count decent (16MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
better than average battery (480 CIPA)
no image stabilization
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Sony A200 as a Vlogging camera
Sony NEX-3N as a Vlogging camera
9
lack of video recording
28
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
doesn't have external mic jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sony A200 vs Sony NEX-3N Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sony A200 and Sony NEX-3N
 Sony Alpha DSLR-A200Sony Alpha NEX-3N
General Information
Company Sony Sony
Model type Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 Sony Alpha NEX-3N
Category Entry-Level DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2008-07-17 2013-02-25
Body design Compact SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size APS-C APS-C
Sensor dimensions 23.6 x 15.8mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 372.9mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3872 x 2592 4912 x 3264
Max native ISO 3200 16000
Minimum native ISO 100 200
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 9 25
Lens
Lens mount type Sony/Minolta Alpha Sony E
Number of lenses 143 121
Focal length multiplier 1.5 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen sizing 2.7 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.55x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames/s 4.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 12.00 m (at ISO 100) -
Flash settings Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync - 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 572 gr (1.26 pounds) 269 gr (0.59 pounds)
Dimensions 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 63 74
DXO Color Depth rating 22.3 22.8
DXO Dynamic range rating 11.3 12.5
DXO Low light rating 521 1067
Other
Battery life - 480 pictures
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NPFW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $100 $399