Sony A200 vs Sony H400
66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
62 Imaging
45 Features
41 Overall
43
Sony A200 vs Sony H400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Revealed July 2008
- Refreshed by Sony A230
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-1550mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 628g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
- Released February 2014
Sony A200 vs Sony H400 Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Sony A200 vs Sony H400, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both designed by Sony. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the A200 (10MP) and H400 (20MP) and the A200 (APS-C) and H400 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe A200 was unveiled 6 years prior to the H400 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony H400 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a simple overview of how the A200 grades vs the H400 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sony A200 vs Sony H400 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400. The full galleries are provided at Sony A200 Gallery & Sony H400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Sony H400
A200 | H400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focus |
Reasons to pick Sony H400 over the Sony A200
H400 | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2014 | July 2008 | More modern by 67 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Sony A200 and Sony H400
A200 | H400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Sony A200 vs Sony H400 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Sony A200 comes with physical measurements of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs) while the Sony H400 has measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") and a weight of 628 grams (1.38 lbs).
Take a look at the Sony A200 vs Sony H400 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached during that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the A200 compared to the H400.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the A200 and H400 is 66 and 62 respectively.
Sony A200 vs Sony H400 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to envision the gap in sensor sizes merely by viewing a spec sheet. The pic below will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the A200 and H400.
Clearly, each of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The A200 having a bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh simpler and the Sony H400 will render extra detail having an extra 10MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged A200 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Sony A200 vs Sony H400 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sony A200 vs Sony H400 Specifications
Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Sony | Sony |
Model type | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2008-07-17 | 2014-02-13 |
Body design | Compact SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz(R) |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 372.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3872 x 2592 | 5152 x 3864 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Sony/Minolta Alpha | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-1550mm (62.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.4-6.5 |
Total lenses | 143 | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | Clear Photo LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 201k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.55x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 8.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 X 720 |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 572 grams (1.26 lb) | 628 grams (1.38 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 63 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 521 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $100 | $268 |