Clicky

Sony A200 vs Sony A35

Portability
66
Imaging
49
Features
38
Overall
44
Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 front
 
Sony SLT-A35 front
Portability
69
Imaging
56
Features
70
Overall
61

Sony A200 vs Sony A35 Key Specs

Sony A200
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
  • Introduced July 2008
  • Replacement is Sony A230
Sony A35
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 415g - 124 x 92 x 85mm
  • Introduced September 2011
  • Superseded the Sony A33
  • Refreshed by Sony A37
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sony A200 vs Sony A35 Overview

Below, we will be contrasting the Sony A200 versus Sony A35, both Entry-Level DSLR cameras and they are both created by Sony. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the A200 (10MP) and A35 (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor sizing (APS-C).

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The A200 was revealed 4 years before the A35 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact SLR).

Before delving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short summary of how the A200 grades versus the A35 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Sony A35

 A200 A35 

Reasons to pick Sony A35 over the Sony A200

 A35 A200 
IntroducedSeptember 2011July 2008More recent by 38 months
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution921k230kSharper screen (+691k dot)

Common features in the Sony A200 and Sony A35

 A200 A35 
Focus manually Very accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Absent Touch friendly screen

Sony A200 vs Sony A35 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Sony A200 has outside measurements of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs) while the Sony A35 has specifications of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 415 grams (0.91 lbs).

Take a look at the Sony A200 versus Sony A35 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have at that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the A200 compared to the A35.

Sony A200 vs Sony A35 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the A200 and A35 is 66 and 69 respectively.

Sony A200 vs Sony A35 top view buttons comparison

Sony A200 vs Sony A35 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, its hard to see the contrast in sensor measurements merely by looking through specs. The visual below should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the A200 and A35.

As you can plainly see, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Sony A35 to provide you with greater detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures much more aggressively. The older A200 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Sony A200 vs Sony A35 sensor size comparison

Sony A200 vs Sony A35 Screen and ViewFinder

Sony A200 vs Sony A35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Sony A200 Portrait photography advice
Sony A35 Portrait photography advice
53
focusing manually
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
no liveview feature
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
73
manual focus
megapixel count decent (16MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
has face detection autofocus
delivers RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Sony A200 as a Street photography camera
Sony A35 as a Street photography camera
65
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
no articulating screen
71
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
lighter than competitors (415 grams)
great high ISO (25,600)
screen is fixed
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sony A200 Sports photography information
Sony A35 Sports photography information
49
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
has phase detect auto focus
no liveview feature
max fps very slow (3.0 fps)
megapixel count low (10MP)
61
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
comes with phase detect autofocus
slow continuous shooting (6.0 fps)
bad battery life (440 per charge)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Sony A200 Travel photography highlights
Sony A35 Travel photography highlights
46
flash built-in
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
megapixel count low (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
58
lighter than competitors (415 grams)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
flash built-in
missing Timelapse function
bad battery life (440 per charge)
screen isn't selfie friendly
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Sony A200 Landscape photography info
Sony A35 Landscape photography info
53
focusing manually
switch lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
no liveview feature
megapixel count low (10MP)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
69
manual focus
change lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
decent sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
great high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW files
bad battery life (440 CIPA)
missing Timelapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Sony A200 Vlogging factors
Sony A35 Vlogging factors
9
no video recording
36
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
has face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does have external microphone support
lighter than competitors (415g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sony A200 vs Sony A35 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sony A200 and Sony A35
 Sony Alpha DSLR-A200Sony SLT-A35
General Information
Brand Name Sony Sony
Model Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 Sony SLT-A35
Category Entry-Level DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Introduced 2008-07-17 2011-09-20
Physical type Compact SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Chip - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size APS-C APS-C
Sensor measurements 23.6 x 15.8mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 372.9mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3872 x 2592 4912 x 3264
Maximum native ISO 3200 25600
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 9 15
Cross focus points - 3
Lens
Lens mount Sony/Minolta Alpha Sony/Minolta Alpha
Amount of lenses 143 143
Crop factor 1.5 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 921 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,150 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage 95% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.55x 0.73x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps 6.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 12.00 m
Flash settings Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize - 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 572 gr (1.26 lbs) 415 gr (0.91 lbs)
Dimensions 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 63 74
DXO Color Depth score 22.3 23.3
DXO Dynamic range score 11.3 12.7
DXO Low light score 521 763
Other
Battery life - 440 shots
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single Single
Price at release $100 $598