Sony A200 vs Sony A65
66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
64 Imaging
63 Features
85 Overall
71
Sony A200 vs Sony A65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Revealed July 2008
- New Model is Sony A230
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 622g - 132 x 97 x 81mm
- Launched November 2011
- Updated by Sony A68
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Sony A200 vs Sony A65 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Sony A200 and Sony A65, both Entry-Level DSLR digital cameras and both are sold by Sony. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the A200 (10MP) and A65 (24MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor size (APS-C).
Photography GlossaryThe A200 was revealed 4 years earlier than the A65 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact SLR).
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the A200 grades vs the A65 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Sony A200 vs Sony A65 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 and Sony SLT-A65. The full galleries are available at Sony A200 Gallery and Sony A65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Sony A65
| A200 | A65 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony A65 over the Sony A200
| A65 | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | November 2011 |  | July 2008 | Newer by 40 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Common features in the Sony A200 and Sony A65
| A200 | A65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Sony A200 vs Sony A65 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Sony A200 has got outer measurements of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs) and the Sony A65 has sizing of 132mm x 97mm x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") with a weight of 622 grams (1.37 lbs).
Check out the Sony A200 and Sony A65 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the A200 compared to the A65.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the A200 and A65 is 66 and 64 respectively.
Sony A200 vs Sony A65 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reading through specifications. The picture below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the A200 and A65.
To sum up, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should expect the Sony A65 to give greater detail because of its extra 14 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged A200 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Sony A200 vs Sony A65 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Sony A200 vs Sony A65 Specifications
| Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | Sony SLT-A65 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Sony | Sony |
| Model type | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | Sony SLT-A65 |
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Revealed | 2008-07-17 | 2011-11-15 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.8mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 372.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 24MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3872 x 2592 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 15 |
| Cross type focus points | - | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Sony/Minolta Alpha | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Total lenses | 143 | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.55x | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 10.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 572 grams (1.26 pounds) | 622 grams (1.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 132 x 97 x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 63 | 74 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 22.3 | 23.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | 12.6 |
| DXO Low light rating | 521 | 717 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 560 shots |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-FM500H |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $100 | $700 |