Sony A290 vs Sony A380
66 Imaging
54 Features
47 Overall
51
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0798d/0798ddacd7eeb1289b58370a77a8d66bd4ccddbb" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d93c6/d93c6340561996445329eba0f2e50769f8f32759" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A380 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A380 front"
68 Imaging
53 Features
54 Overall
53
Sony A290 vs Sony A380 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Launched June 2010
- Succeeded the Sony A230
(Full Review)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sony A290 vs Sony A380 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Sony A290 versus Sony A380, both Entry-Level DSLR digital cameras and they are both manufactured by Sony. The resolution of the A290 (14MP) and the A380 (14MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (APS-C).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The A290 was announced 10 months after the A380 and they are of a similar generation. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact SLR).
Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the A290 scores vs the A380 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sony A290 vs Sony A380 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A380. The whole galleries are viewable at Sony A290 Gallery and Sony A380 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony A290 over the Sony A380
A290 | A380 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2010 | ![]() | August 2009 | More modern by 10 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A380 over the Sony A290
A380 | A290 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Sony A290 and Sony A380
A290 | A380 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equal screen measurement |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch screen |
Sony A290 vs Sony A380 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Sony A290 offers outer dimensions of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") and a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs) while the Sony A380 has specifications of 128mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 519 grams (1.14 lbs).
Check the Sony A290 versus Sony A380 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the A290 versus the A380.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c31df/c31df8cf3535a6b22a5c4d9adfaf5d825ac2fa64" alt="Sony A290 vs Sony A380 size comparison Sony A290 vs Sony A380 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the A290 and A380 is 66 and 68 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d738e/d738e468aec5fde0848071264f1b0038ed1876fc" alt="Sony A290 vs Sony A380 top view buttons comparison Sony A290 vs Sony A380 top view buttons comparison"
Sony A290 vs Sony A380 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizes merely by reading through specifications. The image below may offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the A290 and A380.
Plainly, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same exact resolution and you should expect similar quality of images but you might want to take the release date of the products into consideration. The newer A290 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75df8/75df8681f0244835916ee8b2362b0faf084cc25e" alt="Sony A290 vs Sony A380 sensor size comparison Sony A290 vs Sony A380 sensor size comparison"
Sony A290 vs Sony A380 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9dd69/9dd69cd120eb0c85095af8de1ed64f1f4dcc8d6c" alt="Sony A290 vs Sony A380 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Sony A290 vs Sony A380 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sony A290 vs Sony A380 Specifications
Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A380 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Sony | Sony |
Model type | Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A380 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2010-06-09 | 2009-08-24 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Bionz | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor area | 369.0mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4592 x 3056 | 4592 x 3056 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Sony/Minolta Alpha | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Number of lenses | 143 | 143 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.55x | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/160s | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Max video resolution | None | None |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 549 grams (1.21 lb) | 519 grams (1.14 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") | 128 x 97 x 71mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 66 | 67 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.6 | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.5 | 11.8 |
DXO Low light rating | 615 | 614 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 photographs | 500 photographs |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-FH50 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo, SD/SDHC | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $600 | $899 |