Sony A290 vs Sony HX200V
66 Imaging
54 Features
47 Overall
51
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0798d/0798ddacd7eeb1289b58370a77a8d66bd4ccddbb" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e76b5/e76b5f1031fe999502e3c5fe0f06c140249a3cfe" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V front"
66 Imaging
42 Features
55 Overall
47
Sony A290 vs Sony HX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Released June 2010
- Replaced the Sony A230
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
- Released May 2012
- Old Model is Sony HX100V
- Replacement is Sony HX300
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sony A290 vs Sony HX200V Overview
Following is a extended review of the Sony A290 and Sony HX200V, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are designed by Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the A290 (14MP) and HX200V (18MP) and the A290 (APS-C) and HX200V (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The A290 was brought out 23 months earlier than the HX200V which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Sony A290 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony HX200V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving in to a complete comparison, below is a simple summary of how the A290 matches up versus the HX200V when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sony A290 vs Sony HX200V Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V. The entire galleries are provided at Sony A290 Gallery & Sony HX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony A290 over the Sony HX200V
A290 | HX200V |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Sony A290
HX200V | A290 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2012 | ![]() | June 2010 | More modern by 23 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Sony A290 and Sony HX200V
A290 | HX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch screen |
Sony A290 vs Sony HX200V Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Sony A290 has outer dimensions of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") having a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs) while the Sony HX200V has proportions of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") having a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs).
Compare the Sony A290 and Sony HX200V in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the A290 and the HX200V.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/95713/95713904274f9be399b0349098b036dea9c723f9" alt="Sony A290 vs Sony HX200V size comparison Sony A290 vs Sony HX200V size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the A290 and HX200V is 66 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78da5/78da5cd0932c039d0d4044e9d60a84d81f7399b9" alt="Sony A290 vs Sony HX200V top view buttons comparison Sony A290 vs Sony HX200V top view buttons comparison"
Sony A290 vs Sony HX200V Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reading specifications. The picture here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the A290 and HX200V.
To sum up, both of those cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The A290 because of its bigger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Sony HX200V will offer you extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged A290 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be97a/be97a3b149d6d5a00c80acccadd31b18b5ca93b2" alt="Sony A290 vs Sony HX200V sensor size comparison Sony A290 vs Sony HX200V sensor size comparison"
Sony A290 vs Sony HX200V Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2da8/e2da8ff2b8a644279af2ab68e90d1fefae18a4d2" alt="Sony A290 vs Sony HX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison Sony A290 vs Sony HX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sony A290 vs Sony HX200V Specifications
Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Sony | Sony |
Model | Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2010-06-09 | 2012-05-11 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Bionz | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 369.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 18MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4592 x 3056 | 4896 x 3672 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Sony/Minolta Alpha | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 27-810mm (30.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 143 | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.55x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 12.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/160s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 549 gr (1.21 lb) | 583 gr (1.29 lb) |
Dimensions | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") | 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 66 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 615 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 images | 450 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-FH50 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo, SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $600 | $480 |