Clicky

Sony A300 vs Sony QX1

Portability
64
Imaging
49
Features
45
Overall
47
Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 front
 
Sony Alpha QX1 front
Portability
90
Imaging
63
Features
48
Overall
57

Sony A300 vs Sony QX1 Key Specs

Sony A300
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
  • Revealed January 2008
  • Later Model is Sony A330
Sony QX1
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • " Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
  • Introduced September 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sony A300 vs Sony QX1 Overview

On this page, we will be evaluating the Sony A300 and Sony QX1, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Lens-style and both are built by Sony. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the A300 (10MP) and QX1 (20MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor size (APS-C).

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The A300 was announced 7 years before the QX1 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera.

Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick summation of how the A300 scores versus the QX1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Sony QX1

 A300 QX1 
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen dimensions2.7""Bigger screen (+2.7")
Screen resolution230k0kSharper screen (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Sony A300

 QX1 A300 
IntroducedSeptember 2014January 2008More recent by 80 months
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Sony A300 and Sony QX1

 A300 QX1 
Manually focus More exact focus
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen

Sony A300 vs Sony QX1 Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Sony A300 has outside measurements of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") along with a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs) and the Sony QX1 has proportions of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") along with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).

Check the Sony A300 and Sony QX1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the A300 against the QX1.

Sony A300 vs Sony QX1 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the A300 and QX1 is 64 and 90 respectively.

Sony A300 vs Sony QX1 top view buttons comparison

Sony A300 vs Sony QX1 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is very tough to envision the contrast in sensor measurements just by researching technical specs. The graphic below should give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the A300 and QX1.

As you can tell, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Sony QX1 to render extra detail with its extra 10MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older A300 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Sony A300 vs Sony QX1 sensor size comparison

Sony A300 vs Sony QX1 Screen and ViewFinder

Sony A300 vs Sony QX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Sony A300 Portrait photography advice
Sony QX1 Portrait photography advice
59
has manual focus
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW files
low resolution (10 megapixels)
66
focusing manually
decent MP (20MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
provides face detect focusing
supports RAW formats
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Sony A300
Street photography with Sony QX1
74
screen tilts
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW files
69
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
features touch focus
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
heavier than competitors in class (216g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Sony A300 Sports photography advice
Sony QX1 Sports photography advice
54
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
sensor has phase detect AF
slow frames per second (3.0 fps)
low resolution (10MP)
56
decent MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
good battery pack (440 CIPA)
max frames per second low (4.0 fps)
no image stabilization
does not have phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Sony A300 Travel photography features
Sony QX1 Travel photography features
45
has built in flash
missing Timelapse recording
low resolution (10 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
71
good battery pack (440 CIPA)
features touch focus
decent MP (20MP)
flash built-in
missing Time Lapse function
heavier than competitors in class (216g)
screen is not selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Sony A300 Landscape photography features
Sony QX1 Landscape photography features
57
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW files
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
low resolution (10 megapixels)
missing Timelapse recording
64
focusing manually
change lenses (Sony E mount)
decent MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
good battery pack (440 shots)
tiny screen ( inches)
manual exposure not possible
no image stabilization
missing Time Lapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Sony A300 Vlogging highlights
Sony QX1 Vlogging highlights
9
no video shooting
32
screen is touchscreen
provides face detect focusing
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
missing mic socket
heavier than competitors in class (216g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sony A300 vs Sony QX1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sony A300 and Sony QX1
 Sony Alpha DSLR-A300Sony Alpha QX1
General Information
Make Sony Sony
Model type Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 Sony Alpha QX1
Category Entry-Level DSLR Lens-style
Revealed 2008-01-30 2014-09-03
Physical type Compact SLR Lens-style
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Bionz X
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size APS-C APS-C
Sensor dimensions 23.6 x 15.8mm 23.2 x 15.4mm
Sensor surface area 372.9mm² 357.3mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 4:3 and 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 3872 x 2592 5456 x 3632
Maximum native ISO 3200 16000
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 9 25
Lens
Lens mount type Sony/Minolta Alpha Sony E
Total lenses 143 -
Focal length multiplier 1.5 1.6
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7" -
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 0 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.49x -
Features
Min shutter speed 30s 30s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames per sec 4.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 4.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30p)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 632g (1.39 lb) 216g (0.48 lb)
Physical dimensions 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 64 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 22.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 11.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 538 not tested
Other
Battery life - 440 pictures
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2, 10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Storage type Compact Flash microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $0 $500