Sony A350 vs Sony A65
62 Imaging
52 Features
47 Overall
50
64 Imaging
63 Features
85 Overall
71
Sony A350 vs Sony A65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 674g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Introduced June 2008
- Successor is Sony A380
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 622g - 132 x 97 x 81mm
- Introduced November 2011
- Replacement is Sony A68
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Sony A350 vs Sony A65 Overview
Here, we are comparing the Sony A350 and Sony A65, both Entry-Level DSLR digital cameras and both of them are sold by Sony. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the A350 (14MP) and A65 (24MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (APS-C).
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe A350 was manufactured 4 years earlier than the A65 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact SLR).
Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summation of how the A350 scores versus the A65 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Sony A350 vs Sony A65 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 and Sony SLT-A65. The entire galleries are viewable at Sony A350 Gallery and Sony A65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony A350 over the Sony A65
| A350 | A65 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony A65 over the Sony A350
| A65 | A350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | November 2011 | June 2008 | Newer by 41 months | |
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Sony A350 and Sony A65
| A350 | A65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Touch display | Neither features Touch display |
Sony A350 vs Sony A65 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Sony A350 enjoys outer dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") and a weight of 674 grams (1.49 lbs) while the Sony A65 has proportions of 132mm x 97mm x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") having a weight of 622 grams (1.37 lbs).
Check the Sony A350 and Sony A65 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use during that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the A350 against the A65.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the A350 and A65 is 62 and 64 respectively.
Sony A350 vs Sony A65 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to see the gap between sensor dimensions purely by checking technical specs. The image below will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the A350 and A65.
As you have seen, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Sony A65 to give you extra detail due to its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more aged A350 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Sony A350 vs Sony A65 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Sony A350 vs Sony A65 Specifications
| Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 | Sony SLT-A65 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Sony | Sony |
| Model | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 | Sony SLT-A65 |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Introduced | 2008-06-06 | 2011-11-15 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.8mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 372.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4592 x 3056 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 15 |
| Cross focus points | - | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Sony/Minolta Alpha | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Available lenses | 143 | 143 |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.49x | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 10.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 674 grams (1.49 lb) | 622 grams (1.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") | 132 x 97 x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 65 | 74 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 22.6 | 23.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.5 | 12.6 |
| DXO Low light score | 595 | 717 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 560 photographs |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-FM500H |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $600 | $700 |