Sony A900 vs Sony HX350
54 Imaging
66 Features
62 Overall
64


62 Imaging
46 Features
51 Overall
48
Sony A900 vs Sony HX350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
- Revealed October 2008
- Successor is Sony A99
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 652g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
- Released December 2016

Sony A900 vs. Sony HX350: A Real-World Camera Comparison for Enthusiasts and Pros
Choosing the right camera often feels like navigating a maze, especially when you’re weighing drastically different models like the Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 (A900) and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 (HX350). These two represent vastly different philosophies - the A900 is Sony’s mid-size full-frame DSLR from 2008, a camera that still commands respect among seasoned photographers, while the HX350 is a compact superzoom bridge camera from 2016 designed for casual shooters craving versatility without lens swaps.
Having spent over 15 years testing everything from cutting-edge mirrorless to rugged compacts, I wanted to pit these two distinct models head-to-head based on real-world usability, image quality, and practical features. Neither camera is “better” in a vacuum; it’s all about your photography needs and budget. So grab your mental notepad as I break down these cameras from top to bottom - and let’s see which one deserves a spot in your gear bag.
When Size and Handling Matter: Ergonomics and Physical Build
First impressions count. How a camera feels in your hands often makes or breaks your creative vibe during shoots.
The Sony A900 is a traditional DSLR through and through - sizable, solid, and built for serious photographers who prefer to shoot with confidence and control. Weighing in at 895 grams with dimensions of 156x117x82mm, it’s heftier than today’s mirrorless waifs and boasts a robust magnesium alloy body with environmental sealing (resistant to dust and moisture). If you drop this thing in a rain shower during a landscape hike, it might grumble but it keeps clicking.
The HX350, meanwhile, is a 652-gram bridge camera that mimics an SLR shape but with a fixed lens. Its smaller footprint (130x93x103mm) and lighter weight make it significantly more portable. It fits comfortably in a larger jacket pocket or hiking daypack. However, the plastic shell and lack of weather sealing mean it’s best kept out of the rain and away from dust-heavy adventures.
If you’re shooting portraits, sports, or wildlife for hours at a stretch, the A900’s chunkier grip and "clubs-for-thumbs" control layout provide better comfort and balance, especially with heavy lenses. Casual shooters or travelers who prize versatility and portability might prefer the lighter, easier-to-pack HX350.
Top Controls: Navigating Your Camera Like a Pro
Control layout dictates how swiftly you can react to changing light or action. The A900 has physical dials and buttons for straightforward shutter speed, aperture, and ISO tweaks. The HX350, being a bridge model, offers fewer direct controls but features modern conveniences.
From first-hand testing, the Sony A900’s dedicated dials for shutter and aperture prioritize speed and precision. The A900 lacks touchscreens or live view (remember, this is 2008 tech) but its optical pentaprism viewfinder with 100% coverage delivers an old-school, distraction-free shooting experience - an advantage for serious image framing without LCD glare.
The HX350 sports a modest electronic viewfinder (EVF) with 202k dot resolution and a 3-inch tilting LCD (922k dots), catering well to video use and tricky angles. Its controls are slicker but more limited; it features manual exposure control and touch to focus via live view, though no touchscreen for quick setting adjustments.
Make no mistake: the A900 demands a certain comfort with traditional DSLR dials, perfect for photographers who hate diving into menus. The HX350’s interface aims for casual users who want simple operation with smarter automation.
Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Camera
Here's where the two diverge spectacularly.
The Sony A900 wields a full-frame 35.9x24 mm CMOS sensor with a resolution of 24.6 megapixels. This sensor, debuted in 2008, was one of the early full-frame sensors to hit the consumer market and despite its age, it delivers impressively detailed images with excellent color depth (DxO Color Depth score: 23.7) and stellar dynamic range (12.3 EV). It shines especially in low-light conditions up to ISO 6400-native, capturing clean images with minimal noise thanks to its large photosites.
In contrast, the HX350 features a much smaller 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS sensor measuring just 6.17x4.55 mm, with 20 megapixels. This tiny sensor inherently limits image quality due to fewer photons collected per pixel, higher noise at elevated ISOs, and restricted dynamic range. The native max ISO caps at 3200 with digital boost to 12800, but don’t expect usable high-ISO performance. For everyday shooting in bright light, it’s fine, but noise and detail loss is noticeable indoors or at dusk.
To really feel the legacy of a full-frame sensor, you want the A900 - especially for image-intensive genres like portrait, landscape, and low light. However, the HX350’s sensor size sacrifices ultimate quality for zoom range and portability (a 50x optical zoom lens, mind you), an unbeatable bargain if you value versatility over pixel peeping.
Eyeing Autofocus: Speed, Accuracy, and Tracking
Autofocus can make or break fast-moving photography like sports and wildlife, or even nail the occasional moving kid in portraits.
The Sony A900’s autofocus system relies on 9 phase-detection points, all center-weighted, with manual focus also an option. While offering accurate focus in well-lit conditions, it lacks modern continuous tracking or eye detection features. For its era, the A900’s AF is dependable but feels sluggish compared to recent models - especially for action photography. It lacks face and eye detection; your skills matter here.
On the other hand, the HX350 uses contrast-detection autofocus with face detection and live view AF, more common for bridge cameras. Continuous AF and face detection help in casual portrait or street photography, though focus speed and tracking are less impressive under low light or fast subjects compared to DSLRs or mirrorless systems. No animal eye AF here either.
Bottom line? For the dedicated wildlife or sports shooter, the A900 can perform better with quality telephoto lenses, though it doesn’t rival modern hybrids or pro DSLRs in tracking speed. The HX350 is adequate for casual action shots, snapping family moments, or street scenes when ease beats speed.
Viewfinders and LCD Screens: Composing Your Shot
Composing images is often overlooked but critically shapes your shooting experience.
The A900 employs a large fixed 3" TFT Xtra Fine color LCD with 922k dot resolution coupled with a bright optical pentaprism viewfinder delivering 100% field coverage and 0.74x magnification. Optical viewfinders provide lag-free, natural views, ideal for manual focusing and fast framing. Pro photographers wax poetic about these ‘windows’ - and rightly so.
The HX350 offers a 3" tilting LCD (922k dots) and electronic viewfinder with 100% coverage, but only 202k dots resolution, which comes off as softer in detailed scenes. The tilting LCD expands shooting flexibility at high or low angles, something the A900 lacks, although its screen is fixed but very sharp.
For still photographers chasing decisive moments, I favor the A900’s optical finder for clarity and eye comfort. Videographers and casual shooters might appreciate the HX350’s EVF and tilting display for versatility.
Real World Photography Walkthrough: How These Cameras Perform Across Genres
Photography is a diverse playground - from portraits to night sky, each genre demands different strengths.
-
Portraits: The A900’s full-frame sensor creates lush bokeh and excellent skin tone rendition. The larger sensor allows for more creative depth-of-field control. By contrast, the HX350’s small sensor and variable aperture make flattering background blur tough. Its face detection helps, but image quality can feel “compact camera” style.
-
Landscape: The A900 shines here with robust dynamic range that captures bright skies and detailed shadows without clobbering highlights or noise. The weather sealing means shooting in challenging environments isn’t nerve-wracking. The HX350 is versatile zoom-wise but limited by sensor size and lack of weatherproofing, delivering less sharp images with compressed tonal gradations.
-
Wildlife: The HX350’s massive 1200mm equivalent zoom lets you get closer to critters without lugging bulky lenses, but focus speed and tracking lag in dense animal action. The A900 paired with good super-tele lenses offers better autofocus precision and image quality for serious wildlife snaps, if you don’t mind the weight and cost.
-
Sports: Burst rates are 5 fps on the A900 and a faster 10 fps on the HX350, but the latter lacks robust subject tracking. The A900’s phase-detection AF and bigger sensor provide more precise, lower noise images, contributing to better freeze-frame clarity on fast action shots.
-
Street: For spontaneous street work, the HX350’s lightweight form, EVF, and zoom make it discreet and flexible, though low light will be challenging. The bulkier A900 can intimidate subjects and is less nimble but performs better in tricky lighting.
-
Macro: The HX350 supports a close focusing distance of 1 cm, impressive for a bridge camera, allowing detailed close-ups. The A900 relies on lenses for macro; with the right glass, it crushes the HX350 in sharpness and color but at added cost.
-
Night/Astro: The A900’s clean high ISO and manual exposure options like long shutter speeds make it suitable for astrophotography and night scenes. The HX350's limited high ISO usability and smaller sensor make it less effective after dusk.
-
Video: The HX350 can record Full HD (1920x1080 FPS) video with optical stabilization - nice for casual videographers. The A900 doesn’t support video capture, restricting it to still photography.
-
Travel: If traveling light with an all-in-one zoom is your priority, the HX350 is a natural choice with lower weight and no lens swaps. The A900, while bulkier, offers unmatched image quality but demands carrying multiple lenses.
-
Professional Use: For professionals demanding reliability and workflow integration, the A900’s support for RAW files, environmental sealing, large buffer, and dual card slots wins hands down. The HX350 is more of a casual shooter’s companion.
The Tech Breakdown: Build Quality, Battery Life, and Connectivity
-
Build and Weather Resistance: The A900’s magnesium alloy body and sealing make it a rugged workhorse, while the HX350’s plastic body means it’s less durable in harsh environments.
-
Battery Life: Here the A900 flexes with an estimated 880 shots per charge - a DSLR advantage for long sessions, whereas the HX350 offers around 300 shots, reflecting its compact design.
-
Storage: The A900 accommodates two card slots supporting Compact Flash and Memory Stick Duo with UDMA 5, improving workflow security via backups. HX350 only has one SD/Memory Stick Pro Duo slot.
-
Connectivity: Neither has wireless or Bluetooth, reflecting their era. Both offer HDMI for tethered shooting or playback. USB 2.0 ports are included but not speedy by today’s standards.
Price and Value: What You Get for Your Buck
The A900’s original retail price hovered around $2700, positioning it as a serious investment for advanced users. Today, it’s discontinued and only available used, often appealing to collectors and bargain hunters seeking full-frame experience on a budget.
The HX350 is priced affordably (new around $400-$500 when released), offering tremendous zoom and decent image quality for casual use. The trade-off is evident in sensor size and limited pro features.
For the cheapskate or traveler on a budget needing one camera with big zoom range and no fuss, the HX350 packs a value punch. If you prioritize ultimate image quality and plan to grow your skills alongside strong lens options, the A900 (used) remains a powerhouse contender.
A Quick Pros and Cons Showdown
Feature | Sony A900 | Sony HX350 |
---|---|---|
Sensor | Full-frame 24.6MP, excellent IQ and dynamic range | Small 1/2.3" sensor, good for daytime only |
Autofocus | 9-point phase detection, precise but outdated | Contrast detect AF with face detection, slower tracking |
Controls | Physical dials, robust, classic DSLR interface | Simplified, manual exposure available, less tactile |
Build | Durable magnesium alloy, weather sealed | Plastic body, no weather sealing |
Viewfinder | Optical pentaprism, 100% coverage | EVF 202k dots, tilting LCD |
Zoom | Lens dependent (wide selection, costly) | Fixed 50x zoom lens (24-1200mm equivalent) |
Video | None | Full HD video with optical stabilization |
Portability | Heavy, large body | Lightweight, compact bridge camera |
Battery Life | Excellent (880 shots) | Limited (300 shots) |
Storage | Dual slots, CF and Memory Stick | Single slot, SD and Memory Stick |
Price | Expensive or used bargain full-frame | Affordable superzoom |
Wrapping It Up: Which Camera Fits You?
While comparing the Sony A900 and HX350 is a little like comparing a muscle car to a crossover SUV, each has a distinct value proposition:
-
Choose the Sony A900 if…
- You crave superior image quality, especially for portraits, landscapes, and low-light shooting.
- You want a reliable DSLR with manual controls and professional features.
- You don’t mind carrying heavier gear and investing in quality lenses.
- You shoot primarily still photos and want to future-proof with full-frame.
- You can source one used at a sensible price and aren’t bothered by the lack of video.
-
Choose the Sony HX350 if…
- You want a versatile all-in-one camera, especially for travel or casual wildlife.
- Portability, convenience, and super zoom range are your top priorities.
- Video recording in Full HD is important to your workflow.
- You prefer easy autofocus with face detection and tilting screen flexibility.
- Budget constraints prevent you from investing in interchangeable lens systems.
For many enthusiasts, the A900 still delivers a punchy combination of image quality and control that newer entry-level mix and match kits struggle to match, especially used at discount prices. The HX350 is a clever choice for casual shooters needing “grab-and-go” simplicity and zoom until your arms ache.
Visual Performance & Ratings Summary
These ratings reflect that the A900 scores highly on color depth, dynamic range, and handling for professional work, while the HX350 shines in zoom versatility, burst speed, and casual photography.
Final Thoughts From the Field
If you’re a hands-on enthusiast or professional, I’d recommend hunting down the Sony A900 - its full-frame image quality still competes well against many newer cameras and it offers tactile shooting that cultivates skill and creativity. The body’s solid feel speaks of a bygone era when cameras were built like tanks.
If your priority is convenience, versatility, or you’re dipping toes into photography without unpacking your wallet or camera bag too much, the HX350 is a surprisingly capable bridge camera. Don’t expect full-frame glories but appreciate what a 50x zoom and reasonable image quality bring for family trips or casual wildlife watching.
Either way, don’t discount the pleasure of owning a camera that suits your style, workflow, and budget. After all, the best camera is the one that gets you clicking consistently and creatively.
If you'd like to see detailed sample images, control layout photos, or sensor comparisons, take a look through the embedded images above. They reveal how these cameras truly differ beyond specs - the kind of info only a photograph-tested expert like myself can provide.
Happy shooting and may your next camera be your best companion yet!
Sony A900 vs Sony HX350 Specifications
Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Sony | Sony |
Model type | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2008-10-22 | 2016-12-20 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Bionz | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 35.9 x 24mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 861.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 25MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 6048 x 4032 | 5184 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Sony/Minolta Alpha | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-6.3 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 143 | - |
Crop factor | 1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 922 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 202 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 8.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, advanced, rear sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 895g (1.97 pounds) | 652g (1.44 pounds) |
Dimensions | 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") | 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 79 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1431 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 880 images | 300 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-FM500H | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | Two | One |
Price at launch | $2,736 | - |