Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FH3
58 Imaging
47 Features
76 Overall
58
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6a95/f6a95b31097a048af622a4616c3ead1c1f5af58e" alt="Olympus E-5 front Olympus E-5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98111/98111a0b7c2ad20df355c7415ff9f3db6009ee5f" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 front"
94 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FH3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 800g - 143 x 117 x 75mm
- Announced February 2011
- Superseded the Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 165g - 98 x 55 x 24mm
- Released January 2010
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FS11
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FH3 Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Olympus E-5 and Panasonic FH3, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-5 (12MP) and the FH3 (14MP) is relatively close but the E-5 (Four Thirds) and FH3 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-5 was unveiled 14 months after the FH3 which makes them a generation away from each other. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-5 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FH3 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-5 matches up against the FH3 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FH3 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-5 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-5 Gallery & Panasonic FH3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-5 over the Panasonic FH3
E-5 | FH3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2011 | ![]() | January 2010 | Newer by 14 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH3 over the Olympus E-5
FH3 | E-5 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-5 and Panasonic FH3
E-5 | FH3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch screen |
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FH3 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera, you should think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-5 offers external dimensions of 143mm x 117mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") with a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs) while the Panasonic FH3 has sizing of 98mm x 55mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-5 and Panasonic FH3 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the E-5 against the FH3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f908/0f9088133ef491ca9ab19b37b78f4e2c30d1ade1" alt="Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FH3 size comparison Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FH3 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-5 and FH3 is 58 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10af2/10af2e22475457ad790c26c351629c6851d1a07e" alt="Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FH3 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FH3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FH3 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to see the gap in sensor dimensions just by viewing technical specs. The pic here should give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-5 and FH3.
As you have seen, both cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-5 having a bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF easier and the Panasonic FH3 will result in greater detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The newer E-5 is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1cdc/a1cdc9d99989899498651d2039be6585d7f22917" alt="Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FH3 sensor size comparison Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FH3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FH3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd9d3/bd9d37c76efde432e4fedf628ca16b66ad6f4983" alt="Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FH3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FH3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic FH3 Specifications
Olympus E-5 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-5 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 |
Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-FS11 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2011-02-03 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic V+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 9 |
Cross type focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-6.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal transmissive LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 18.00 m (at ISO 200) | 6.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 800g (1.76 lb) | 165g (0.36 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 143 x 117 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 98 x 55 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 519 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 pictures | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLM-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II)/SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | 2 | Single |
Pricing at launch | $1,700 | $160 |