Sony A900 vs Sony W320
54 Imaging
66 Features
62 Overall
64
97 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Sony A900 vs Sony W320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
- Introduced October 2008
- Replacement is Sony A99
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
- Launched January 2010
Sony A900 vs Sony W320 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Sony A900 versus Sony W320, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Ultracompact and both of them are created by Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the A900 (25MP) and W320 (14MP) and the A900 (Full frame) and W320 (1/2.3") provide different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe A900 was brought out 14 months earlier than the W320 which makes them a generation apart from one another. The two cameras have different body design with the Sony A900 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony W320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a quick summary of how the A900 grades against the W320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sony A900 vs Sony W320 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320. The entire galleries are available at Sony A900 Gallery & Sony W320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Sony W320
A900 | W320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 230k | Crisper screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Sony A900
W320 | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2010 | October 2008 | Fresher by 14 months |
Common features in the Sony A900 and Sony W320
A900 | W320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Sony A900 vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Sony A900 has got exterior measurements of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") and a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs) and the Sony W320 has measurements of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") having a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Examine the Sony A900 versus Sony W320 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the A900 versus the W320.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the A900 and W320 is 54 and 97 respectively.
Sony A900 vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizing merely by looking through specs. The visual here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the A900 and W320.
All in all, each of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The A900 because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Sony A900 will result in extra detail having its extra 11 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The older A900 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Sony A900 vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sony A900 vs Sony W320 Specifications
Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Sony | Sony |
Model | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2008-10-22 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Bionz | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Full frame | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 35.9 x 24mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 861.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 25MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 6048 x 4032 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Sony/Minolta Alpha | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.7-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | - | 4cm |
Number of lenses | 143 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 922 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30s | 1s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 895 gr (1.97 lb) | 117 gr (0.26 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") | 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 79 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1431 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 880 shots | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-FM500H | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
Card slots | Dual | 1 |
Retail cost | $2,736 | $269 |