Clicky

Sony A900 vs Sony W320

Portability
54
Imaging
66
Features
62
Overall
64
Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 front
Portability
97
Imaging
36
Features
21
Overall
30

Sony A900 vs Sony W320 Key Specs

Sony A900
(Full Review)
  • 25MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
  • Introduced October 2008
  • Replacement is Sony A99
Sony W320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
  • 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
  • Launched January 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sony A900 vs Sony W320 Overview

On this page, we will be analyzing the Sony A900 versus Sony W320, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Ultracompact and both of them are created by Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the A900 (25MP) and W320 (14MP) and the A900 (Full frame) and W320 (1/2.3") provide different sensor dimensions.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The A900 was brought out 14 months earlier than the W320 which makes them a generation apart from one another. The two cameras have different body design with the Sony A900 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony W320 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a quick summary of how the A900 grades against the W320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Sony W320

 A900 W320 
Manually focus More exact focusing
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution922k230kCrisper screen (+692k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Sony A900

 W320 A900 
LaunchedJanuary 2010October 2008Fresher by 14 months

Common features in the Sony A900 and Sony W320

 A900 W320 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither contains Touch friendly screen

Sony A900 vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to carry your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Sony A900 has got exterior measurements of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") and a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs) and the Sony W320 has measurements of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") having a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).

Examine the Sony A900 versus Sony W320 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the A900 versus the W320.

Sony A900 vs Sony W320 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the A900 and W320 is 54 and 97 respectively.

Sony A900 vs Sony W320 top view buttons comparison

Sony A900 vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizing merely by looking through specs. The visual here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the A900 and W320.

All in all, each of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The A900 because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Sony A900 will result in extra detail having its extra 11 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The older A900 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Sony A900 vs Sony W320 sensor size comparison

Sony A900 vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder

Sony A900 vs Sony W320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Sony A900 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony W320 as a Portrait photography camera
71
you can focus manually
megapixel count excellent (25 megapixels)
sensor size is great (Full frame)
supports RAW files
no liveview feature
28
good MP (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Street photography with Sony A900
Street photography with Sony W320
66
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is great (Full frame)
supports RAW files
environment sealing
no articulating screen
48
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sony A900 Sports photography features
Sony W320 Sports photography features
70
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000s)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count excellent (25MP)
sensor size is great (Full frame)
environment sealing
sensor has phase detect autofocus
no liveview feature
painfully slow continuous shooting (5.0 fps)
26
good MP (14MP)
continuous shooting slow (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Sony A900 as a Travel photography camera
Sony W320 as a Travel photography camera
54
environment sealing
megapixel count excellent (25MP)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
66
good MP (14MP)
flash built-in
fairly wide (26mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.7)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Sony A900 Landscape photography information
Sony W320 Landscape photography information
72
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
nice screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count excellent (25 megapixels)
sensor size is great (Full frame)
supports RAW files
environment sealing
has dual storage slots
no liveview feature
doesn't have Timelapse recording
33
fairly wide (26mm)
good MP (14MP)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.7)
screen is small (2.7")
no manual exposure
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
lack of Time Lapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Sony A900 Vlogging highlights
Sony W320 Vlogging highlights
9
lack of video recording
26
fairly wide (26mm)
slow max aperture (f2.7)
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of external mic support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sony A900 vs Sony W320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sony A900 and Sony W320
 Sony Alpha DSLR-A900Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
General Information
Brand Sony Sony
Model Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
Class Advanced DSLR Ultracompact
Introduced 2008-10-22 2010-01-07
Physical type Mid-size SLR Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by Bionz -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Full frame 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 35.9 x 24mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 861.6mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 25MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 6048 x 4032 4320 x 3240
Max native ISO 6400 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens mount Sony/Minolta Alpha fixed lens
Lens focal range - 26-105mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.7-5.7
Macro focus distance - 4cm
Number of lenses 143 -
Focal length multiplier 1 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of display 922 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display technology TFT Xtra Fine color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Min shutter speed 30s 1s
Max shutter speed 1/8000s 1/1600s
Continuous shutter rate 5.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash 4.80 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 640x480
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 895 gr (1.97 lb) 117 gr (0.26 lb)
Physical dimensions 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 79 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.3 not tested
DXO Low light score 1431 not tested
Other
Battery life 880 shots -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery model NP-FM500H NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 sec or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Card slots Dual 1
Retail cost $2,736 $269