Sony A900 vs Sony W330
54 Imaging
66 Features
62 Overall
64
96 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Sony A900 vs Sony W330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
- Revealed October 2008
- Successor is Sony A99
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 128g - 96 x 57 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2010
Sony A900 vs Sony W330 Overview
Here is a extended analysis of the Sony A900 and Sony W330, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Ultracompact and they are both manufactured by Sony. There exists a significant gap between the image resolutions of the A900 (25MP) and W330 (14MP) and the A900 (Full frame) and W330 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe A900 was launched 14 months before the W330 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Sony A900 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony W330 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a concise overview of how the A900 grades versus the W330 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sony A900 vs Sony W330 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330. The complete galleries are viewable at Sony A900 Gallery and Sony W330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Sony W330
A900 | W330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 922k | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W330 over the Sony A900
W330 | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2010 | October 2008 | Fresher by 14 months |
Common features in the Sony A900 and Sony W330
A900 | W330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Sony A900 vs Sony W330 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Sony A900 has physical dimensions of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs) while the Sony W330 has measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 17mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Examine the Sony A900 and Sony W330 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the A900 compared to the W330.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the A900 and W330 is 54 and 96 respectively.
Sony A900 vs Sony W330 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizing simply by looking at a spec sheet. The graphic here might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the A900 and W330.
Clearly, each of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The A900 featuring a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Sony A900 will give you greater detail utilizing its extra 11MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The older A900 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Sony A900 vs Sony W330 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sony A900 vs Sony W330 Specifications
Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Sony | Sony |
Model | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2008-10-22 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Bionz | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Full frame | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 35.9 x 24mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 861.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 25 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 6048 x 4032 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Sony/Minolta Alpha | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.7-5.7 |
Macro focus range | - | 4cm |
Total lenses | 143 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 922 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 2 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 895 gr (1.97 lbs) | 128 gr (0.28 lbs) |
Dimensions | 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") | 96 x 57 x 17mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 79 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1431 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 880 pictures | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-FM500H | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | 2 | Single |
Retail cost | $2,736 | $170 |