Sony NEX-3N vs Sony RX1R
89 Imaging
57 Features
52 Overall
55
79 Imaging
69 Features
58 Overall
64
Sony NEX-3N vs Sony RX1R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
- Released February 2013
- Superseded the Sony NEX-F3
- Renewed by Sony a5000
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
- Announced June 2013
- Successor is Sony RX1R II
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Sony NEX-3N vs Sony RX1R Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Sony NEX-3N vs Sony RX1R, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact and both are sold by Sony. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the NEX-3N (16MP) and RX1R (24MP) and the NEX-3N (APS-C) and RX1R (Full frame) posses different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe NEX-3N was released 4 months before the RX1R which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Sony NEX-3N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony RX1R being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the NEX-3N scores versus the RX1R when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Sony NEX-3N vs Sony RX1R Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Sony Alpha NEX-3N & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R. The complete galleries are viewable at Sony NEX-3N Gallery & Sony RX1R Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Sony RX1R
| NEX-3N | RX1R | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Sony RX1R over the Sony NEX-3N
| RX1R | NEX-3N | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 1229k | 460k | Crisper screen (+769k dot) |
Common features in the Sony NEX-3N and Sony RX1R
| NEX-3N | RX1R | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2013 | June 2013 | Similar age | |
| Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Sony NEX-3N vs Sony RX1R Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Sony NEX-3N has outer dimensions of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) whilst the Sony RX1R has dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") having a weight of 482 grams (1.06 lbs).
Check the Sony NEX-3N vs Sony RX1R in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the NEX-3N vs the RX1R.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the NEX-3N and RX1R is 89 and 79 respectively.
Sony NEX-3N vs Sony RX1R Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to imagine the gap between sensor measurements purely by checking specs. The photograph underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the NEX-3N and RX1R.
All in all, both the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The NEX-3N featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF more challenging and the Sony RX1R will give you greater detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively.
Sony NEX-3N vs Sony RX1R Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Sony NEX-3N vs Sony RX1R Specifications
| Sony Alpha NEX-3N | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Sony | Sony |
| Model | Sony Alpha NEX-3N | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2013-02-25 | 2013-06-26 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Bionz | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Full frame |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 35.8 x 23.9mm |
| Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 855.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4912 x 3264 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Max native ISO | 16000 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Sony E | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 35mm (1x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.0 |
| Amount of lenses | 121 | - |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 1,229k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | Xtra FineTFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic and Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 6.00 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Sync, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/160 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 269 gr (0.59 lbs) | 482 gr (1.06 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 74 | 91 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 22.8 | 25.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | 13.6 |
| DXO Low light score | 1067 | 2537 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 480 shots | 270 shots |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NPFW50 | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $399 | $2,798 |