Sony NEX-3N vs Sony RX1R
89 Imaging
56 Features
52 Overall
54
79 Imaging
69 Features
58 Overall
64
Sony NEX-3N vs Sony RX1R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
- Released February 2013
- Superseded the Sony NEX-F3
- Renewed by Sony a5000
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
- Announced June 2013
- Successor is Sony RX1R II
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Sony NEX-3N vs Sony RX1R Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Sony NEX-3N vs Sony RX1R, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact and both are sold by Sony. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the NEX-3N (16MP) and RX1R (24MP) and the NEX-3N (APS-C) and RX1R (Full frame) posses different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe NEX-3N was released 4 months before the RX1R which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Sony NEX-3N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony RX1R being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the NEX-3N scores versus the RX1R when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Sony NEX-3N vs Sony RX1R Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Sony Alpha NEX-3N & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R. The complete galleries are viewable at Sony NEX-3N Gallery & Sony RX1R Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Sony RX1R
| NEX-3N | RX1R | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Sony RX1R over the Sony NEX-3N
| RX1R | NEX-3N | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 1229k | 460k | Crisper screen (+769k dot) |
Common features in the Sony NEX-3N and Sony RX1R
| NEX-3N | RX1R | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2013 | June 2013 | Similar age | |
| Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Sony NEX-3N vs Sony RX1R Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Sony NEX-3N has outer dimensions of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) whilst the Sony RX1R has dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") having a weight of 482 grams (1.06 lbs).
Check the Sony NEX-3N vs Sony RX1R in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the NEX-3N vs the RX1R.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the NEX-3N and RX1R is 89 and 79 respectively.
Sony NEX-3N vs Sony RX1R Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to imagine the gap between sensor measurements purely by checking specs. The photograph underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the NEX-3N and RX1R.
All in all, both the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The NEX-3N featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF more challenging and the Sony RX1R will give you greater detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively.
Sony NEX-3N vs Sony RX1R Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Sony NEX-3N vs Sony RX1R Specifications
| Sony Alpha NEX-3N | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Sony | Sony |
| Model | Sony Alpha NEX-3N | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2013-02-25 | 2013-06-26 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Bionz | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Full frame |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 35.8 x 23.9mm |
| Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 855.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4912 x 3264 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Max native ISO | 16000 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Sony E | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 35mm (1x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.0 |
| Amount of lenses | 121 | - |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 1,229k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | Xtra FineTFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic and Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 6.00 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Sync, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/160 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 269 gr (0.59 lbs) | 482 gr (1.06 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 74 | 91 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 22.8 | 25.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | 13.6 |
| DXO Low light score | 1067 | 2537 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 480 shots | 270 shots |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NPFW50 | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $399 | $2,798 |