Sony NEX-3N vs Sony W220
89 Imaging
57 Features
52 Overall
55
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Sony NEX-3N vs Sony W220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
- Introduced February 2013
- Older Model is Sony NEX-F3
- Replacement is Sony a5000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 30-120mm (F2.8-7.1) lens
- 147g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
Sony NEX-3N vs Sony W220 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Sony NEX-3N vs Sony W220, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both offered by Sony. There is a big difference between the resolutions of the NEX-3N (16MP) and W220 (12MP) and the NEX-3N (APS-C) and W220 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe NEX-3N was released 4 years after the W220 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Sony NEX-3N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony W220 being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the NEX-3N scores vs the W220 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sony NEX-3N vs Sony W220 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Sony Alpha NEX-3N and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220. The complete galleries are viewable at Sony NEX-3N Gallery and Sony W220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Sony W220
NEX-3N | W220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2013 | January 2009 | More modern by 51 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W220 over the Sony NEX-3N
W220 | NEX-3N |
---|
Common features in the Sony NEX-3N and Sony W220
NEX-3N | W220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Sony NEX-3N vs Sony W220 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and size. The Sony NEX-3N has got physical measurements of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) and the Sony W220 has specifications of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs).
Analyze the Sony NEX-3N vs Sony W220 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the NEX-3N versus the W220.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the NEX-3N and W220 is 89 and 95 respectively.
Sony NEX-3N vs Sony W220 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to see the contrast between sensor sizes simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic below will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the NEX-3N and W220.
Clearly, both of those cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The NEX-3N because of its larger sensor will make getting bokeh simpler and the Sony NEX-3N will offer you extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will help you crop photos way more aggressively. The more modern NEX-3N will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Sony NEX-3N vs Sony W220 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sony NEX-3N vs Sony W220 Specifications
Sony Alpha NEX-3N | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Sony | Sony |
Model type | Sony Alpha NEX-3N | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2013-02-25 | 2009-01-08 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Bionz | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4912 x 3264 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 16000 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 25 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Sony E | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 30-120mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-7.1 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 121 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 1s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 7.10 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | - | Auto, Flash On, Slow Syncro, Red-eye, Flash Off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/160s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (8 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 269g (0.59 pounds) | 147g (0.32 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 74 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1067 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 480 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NPFW50 | - |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $399 | $160 |