Sony QX1 vs Sony HX200V
90 Imaging
63 Features
48 Overall
57
66 Imaging
42 Features
55 Overall
47
Sony QX1 vs Sony HX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
- Introduced September 2014
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
- Launched May 2012
- Superseded the Sony HX100V
- Refreshed by Sony HX300
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Sony QX1 vs Sony HX200V Overview
Following is a thorough assessment of the Sony QX1 versus Sony HX200V, former is a Lens-style while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both built by Sony. The resolution of the QX1 (20MP) and the HX200V (18MP) is very comparable but the QX1 (APS-C) and HX200V (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe QX1 was revealed 2 years after the HX200V which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera and the Sony HX200V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise summary of how the QX1 scores vs the HX200V with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Sony QX1 vs Sony HX200V Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Sony Alpha QX1 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V. The full galleries are viewable at Sony QX1 Gallery & Sony HX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Sony HX200V
| QX1 | HX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2014 |  | May 2012 | More modern by 29 months |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Sony QX1
| HX200V | QX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | " | Larger display (+3") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 0k | Clearer display (+922k dot) |
Common features in the Sony QX1 and Sony HX200V
| QX1 | HX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Sony QX1 vs Sony HX200V Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Sony QX1 provides physical measurements of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") along with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Sony HX200V has sizing of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") and a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs).
Contrast the Sony QX1 versus Sony HX200V in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the QX1 and the HX200V.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the QX1 and HX200V is 90 and 66 respectively.
Sony QX1 vs Sony HX200V Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to envision the difference in sensor sizes merely by seeing specs. The pic underneath might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the QX1 and HX200V.
All in all, both of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The QX1 having a larger sensor will make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Sony QX1 will provide extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more modern QX1 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Sony QX1 vs Sony HX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Sony QX1 vs Sony HX200V Specifications
| Sony Alpha QX1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Sony | Sony |
| Model type | Sony Alpha QX1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V |
| Type | Lens-style | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2014-09-03 | 2012-05-11 |
| Physical type | Lens-style | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Bionz X | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 23.2 x 15.4mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 357.3mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 5456 x 3632 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Max native ISO | 16000 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Sony E | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 27-810mm (30.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | - | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 0k dots | 922k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | - | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 100) | 12.40 m |
| Flash options | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 216 gr (0.48 lbs) | 583 gr (1.29 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") | 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 440 pictures | 450 pictures |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-FW50 | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $500 | $480 |
