Sony a5000 vs Sony T99
89 Imaging
62 Features
62 Overall
62


96 Imaging
36 Features
27 Overall
32
Sony a5000 vs Sony T99 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 110 x 63 x 36mm
- Introduced January 2014
- Superseded the Sony NEX-3N
- Renewed by Sony a5100
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 121g - 93 x 56 x 17mm
- Announced July 2010

Comparing the Sony a5000 and Sony T99: Finding the Right Camera for Your Photography Journey
As someone who has evaluated and tested hundreds of cameras over the past 15 years, I understand the challenge photographers face when choosing a new camera: balancing features, image quality, ergonomics, and price. Today, I’m diving into a detailed comparison of two very different Sony models - the Sony Alpha a5000, an entry-level mirrorless from 2014, and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99, a compact point-and-shoot announced in 2010. Both appeal to casual shooters, but which one is best suited to your photography ambitions? With hands-on use and technical scrutiny, I’ll guide you through how these cameras stack up in design, performance, image quality, and usability across genres.
Getting a Grip: Size and Ergonomics Matter
At first glance, the a5000 and the T99 feel like they belong to two separate camera worlds. The a5000 is a rangefinder-style mirrorless camera with a solid grip and a decidedly more substantial body. The T99, by comparison, is a sleek, pocketable ultracompact designed for quick grab-and-go shooting.
Weighing in at 269 grams and measuring 110x63x36mm, the Sony a5000 offers a more confident hold, with physical buttons and dials that made shooting manual exposure modes feasible in real life. The a5000’s larger body also means more space for better battery capacity and heat dissipation - great for extended shooting.
On the other hand, the T99 is extremely lightweight (121 grams) with dimensions of only 93x56x17mm. This slim, almost credit card-sized form factor fits easily in a pocket, emphasizing portability over ergonomic comfort. Its controls are minimal, and its small thumbwheel can feel fidgety when adjusting settings.
For photographers who value a more tactile shooting experience and plan to shoot beyond automatic modes, the a5000 clearly has upper hand. But the T99’s ultra-compact form may win over casual snappers seeking instant, no-fuss snapshots.
Design Details: Control Layout and Interface
Sony’s design philosophy is evident when you examine the control layouts side by side.
The a5000 sports dedicated dials and buttons that support full manual exposure modes (Aperture Priority, Shutter Priority, Manual), exposure compensation, and ISO control. I found this intuitive after some familiarization; the button placement prioritizes quick adjustments without diving into menus. The tilting 180-degree upward screen also allows creative angles and effective self-shooting. However, the a5000 lacks touchscreen input, which is increasingly common post-2014.
The T99, in contrast, has a simplified, streamlined top plate that reflects its point-and-shoot nature. It lacks manual exposure controls entirely - a compromise for the ultra-compact size. It’s touch-screen enabled, which can feel novel for a compact from 2010, but its fixed 3-inch screen offers limited resolution (230k dots), which is less crisp than the a5000’s higher resolution 461k-dot screen.
For photographers who like to tweak settings on the fly or desire tactile control, the a5000 wins again. But if simplicity and a lightweight, one-hand operation appeal to you, the T99 has merit.
Sensor and Image Quality - The Heart of the Camera
Arguably the most critical comparison when judging cameras comes down to sensor technology, size, and resulting image quality.
The Sony a5000 shines with its 20.1MP APS-C CMOS sensor measuring 23.2 by 15.4 mm - a size typical of enthusiast mirrorless cameras. This larger sensor provides a substantial advantage in dynamic range, low-light capability, and overall image fidelity. The a5000 scored a solid 79 on DxOMark’s overall sensor score, with a color depth of 23.8 bits and a dynamic range of 13 EV stops. Its maximum ISO of 16,000 (though noisier at this level) gives flexibility for indoor and night shooting.
The Sony T99, by comparison, features a much smaller 1/2.3 inch CCD sensor (6.17 by 4.55 mm) with 14MP resolution. The tiny sensor area, about 28 mm², affects light-gathering ability, introducing noise and reducing dynamic range at higher ISOs (3200 max native ISO). Its CCD tech is also older, lacking the advanced noise reduction and efficiency found in modern CMOS sensors. Sony never submitted this sensor for DxOMark testing, highlighting its compact point-and-shoot positioning.
From my side-by-side tests under controlled light, images from the a5000 show richer tonal gradations, cleaner shadows, and superior detail rendition - especially in RAW format. The T99, while passable in bright daylight, struggles with noise and lacks detail resolution deep into shadows.
Looking at the Back: LCD and Viewfinder Experience
Neither the a5000 nor T99 has a built-in viewfinder, which situates both models firmly in the entry-level/compact realms. But their rear LCD implementations differ.
The a5000 features a high-resolution 3-inch tilting TFT LCD (461k dots). This display is bright and accurate enough for judging focus and exposure even outdoors. The 180-degree upward tilt is a boon for selfie enthusiasts or photographers experimenting with low or high angles. The downside is the lack of touchscreen functionality, which modern users might miss.
The T99’s fixed 3-inch touchscreen with 230k dots is simplistic by comparison. While touchscreen operation affords a degree of menu navigation ease, the low resolution and fixed angle diminish its utility for critical image review or creative framing.
In practice, I found the a5000’s screen better suited for enthusiastic photographers who experiment with composition beyond eye level, whereas the T99 caters to casual photography where the screen is mostly a simple framing aid.
Autofocus: Speed and Accuracy Under Pressure
When I test cameras, autofocus (AF) performance is pivotal - it affects nearly all photography genres, from portraits to sports.
-
Sony a5000 implements a contrast-detection-only autofocus system with 25 focus points. Although contrast AF is slower than phase detection in theory, the a5000 performs reasonably well for its class, particularly in well-lit scenes. The camera supports single AF, continuous AF, face detection, and tracking, facilitating decent subject acquisition. However, it does not have phase-detection AF or animal eye AF, limiting performance with fast-moving or unpredictable subjects.
-
Sony T99, being a fixed lens compact, employs a more rudimentary contrast-detection AF with just 9 focus points and no continuous or tracking AF modes. Its autofocus is generally slower and less consistent, especially in low light or with moving subjects.
In my real-world tests of wildlife and street photography scenarios, the a5000’s AF consistently outperformed the T99. Burst shooting up to 4fps on the a5000 further enhances its utility for action, while the T99’s 10fps burst with limited AF capabilities is less practical for sports or wildlife.
Exploring Photography Genres: Where Each Camera Excels
Let’s dig into how these cameras perform across photography disciplines, combining technical specs and my practical field experience.
Portraits: Skin Tones and Bokeh
The a5000’s APS-C sensor contributes to smoother skin tone gradations and better separation from backgrounds due to a shallower depth of field with fast lenses. Paired with Sony’s extensive E-mount lens ecosystem (over 120 lenses), including fast primes and portrait-friendly zooms, you can achieve creamy bokeh with eye detection AF (though animal eye AF is not supported).
The T99’s small sensor and fixed zoom lens (25-100mm equivalent, f/3.5-4.6 max aperture) limit background separation and produce flatter skin tones. Its optical image stabilization is a plus, but focus precision and shallow depth of field are lacking.
Landscape: Dynamic Range and Resolution
With a wider dynamic range (13 EV) and high-resolution output (5456x3632 native), the a5000 captures detailed, texture-rich landscapes, important for post-processing and large prints. While the a5000 is not weather sealed, its lens compatibility includes weather-resistant options for tougher environments.
The T99’s sensor struggles here, with lower dynamic range and resolution (4320x3240), impoverishing shadow recovery in landscape scenes. Lack of weather sealing also restricts outdoor robustness.
Wildlife and Sports: Autofocus and Speed
The a5000’s moderate burst rate (4fps) and face/subject tracking AF make it usable for casual wildlife and sports photography, though not top-tier for fast action. Its lens options for telephoto zooms improve reach and framing.
The T99 is limited by slow AF, fixed lens, and lower frame rates in real-world tracking, so it’s a poor fit for these genres.
Street and Travel: Discretion and Portability
Here, the T99’s compact size and lightweight build shine. It fits in a coat pocket and can be operated inconspicuously - a key asset in street photography. Its touchscreen enables quick snapshots without fumbling for buttons.
However, the a5000’s compact mirrorless form, while larger, remains lightweight and versatile enough for travel photography, offering more control, better image quality, and longer battery life (420 frames vs. limited info on the T99).
Macro and Night/Astro Photography
Neither camera offers significant macro focusing enhancements beyond their minimum focus distances, though the T99 excels at close focusing (1cm minimum).
Night and astrophotography require high ISO performance and manual controls - both in which the a5000 outperforms the T99 by a large margin. The a5000’s maximum ISO of 16,000 and support for RAW capture offer significant creative latitude not possible on the T99.
Video: Capabilities and Formats
The a5000 records full HD 1080p at 60i/24p and 1440x1080 at 25fps, supporting both AVCHD and MPEG-4 formats. However, it lacks microphone or headphone inputs, and its image stabilization depends on lenses.
The T99 offers basic 720p video at 30fps with MPEG-4 encoding, with no advanced video features or external audio support. Its optical stabilization helps handheld video.
Build Quality, Durability, and Battery Life
Neither camera is weather sealed or ruggedized. The a5000’s build is sturdier than the plasticky T99, reflecting its more advanced positioning.
Battery life is a major advantage of the a5000, with rated ~420 shots per charge on the NP-FW50 battery. The T99’s battery info is less clear but generally lower due to size constraints and the older battery system.
For extended shooting without frequent recharging, the a5000 is preferable.
Connectivity and Storage
The a5000 includes Wi-Fi and NFC for fast wireless image transfer and remote control via smartphone apps - modern conveniences extending use cases.
The T99 supports Eye-Fi card connectivity, allowing wireless transfers using specific SD cards, but lacks native Wi-Fi or NFC. Both cameras rely on USB 2.0 for wired transfers, and each supports common SD card formats.
Lens Ecosystem and Expansion Potential
One of the a5000’s strongest points is its compatibility with the Sony E-mount system, consisting of over 120 lenses ranging from ultra-wide to telephoto primes and zooms, plus third-party and manual optics. This versatility enables photographers to evolve their kit as skills and genres develop.
The T99’s fixed, non-interchangeable 25-100mm f/3.5-4.6 lens limits creative flexibility, locking users into a basic zoom range.
Sample Images Tell the Tale
Here are some example gallery shots from both cameras, showcasing everyday lighting and subjects.
Notice the richer tonal detail, sharper edges, and less noise in the a5000 photos, even in challenging shadows. The T99 images appear softer with more noise and less color accuracy.
Final Scores: Performance Overview
Putting all technical and experiential data together, I scored each camera’s strengths.
The a5000 clearly leads in sensor performance, autofocus, image quality, battery life, and versatility. The T99 garners points for portability and simplicity but trails in vital photographic capabilities.
How They Score by Photography Genre
Breaking down their suitability per genre:
- Portraits, Landscape, Wildlife, Night, and Professional Photography: a5000 excels.
- Street and Travel: T99’s compactness is a minor advantage, though a5000 is still very capable.
- Basic snapshots and casual video: T99 suffices if ultimate quality is not prioritized.
Who Should Buy the Sony a5000?
If you want a capable entry-level mirrorless camera that balances image quality, creative control, and future expandability, the a5000 remains a very strong contender. It fits beginners growing into enthusiast shooting, casual professionals, and travelers who want excellent photos without lugging a DSLR.
Pros:
- Larger APS-C sensor, great image quality and dynamic range
- Manual control with exposure modes for creative flexibility
- Tilting LCD screen and good ergonomics
- Decent autofocus with face detection and tracking
- Extensive lens compatibility
- Strong battery life and wireless connectivity
Cons:
- No touchscreen
- No viewfinder
- No weather sealing
Who Should Consider the Sony T99?
The T99 appeals mostly to ultra-casual photographers who prioritize pocket-friendly design above all. If you want a camera smaller than many smartphones and plan mostly daylight snapshots without fuss, the T99 may meet your simplicity needs.
Pros:
- Ultra-compact and lightweight
- Touchscreen interface
- Optical image stabilization
- Simple automatic modes
Cons:
- Small sensor limiting image quality and dynamic range
- Fixed lens with limited aperture range
- Slow, less reliable autofocus
- No video mic input or advanced filming options
Practical Tips for Choosing Between These Models
- Prioritize image quality, manual controls, and future growth? Lean toward the a5000. It’s the better investment for enthusiasts and serious beginners.
- Need a truly pocketable camera for casual snapshots or travel backup? Choose the T99 for ease and portability with acceptable image quality for social sharing.
- Interested in portraits, landscapes, nighttime shots, or video? The a5000’s sensor and controls enable more creative expression.
- On a tight budget and comfortable with automatic settings? The T99 offers a friendly entry into digital photography for about half the price.
Closing Thoughts: Experience Counts
Testing these cameras side-by-side reinforced a key lesson: sensor size and system flexibility matter immensely. The Sony a5000, despite its mid-2010s age, remains a relevant, versatile mirrorless choice for millions aspiring to elevate their photography. The T99 is a niche ultracompact that suits only basic, casual use.
I’ve been fortunate to test countless Sony E-mount cameras and compacts over my career. The a5000 represents a stepping stone into a rich ecosystem and produces images that still hold up well against newer models. Meanwhile, the T99’s charm lies purely in convenience, acting as a lightweight point-and-shoot for snapshots.
Choosing the right camera hinges on your photographic ambitions, budget, and shooting style. This comparison provides a thorough grounding to help you decide wisely.
Feel free to reach out with questions about testing methods or practical usage scenarios. Photography is a lifelong journey - having the right tool makes all the difference.
Happy shooting!
-
Disclosure: I have no financial affiliation with Sony. All assessments are based on independent hands-on testing and industry-standard benchmarks.
Sony a5000 vs Sony T99 Specifications
Sony Alpha a5000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Sony | Sony |
Model | Sony Alpha a5000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2014-01-07 | 2010-07-08 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Bionz X | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.2 x 15.4mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 357.3mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5456 x 3632 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 16000 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Sony E | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 121 | - |
Crop factor | 1.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 461k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD with 180 upward tilt | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 2 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1250 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.60 m |
Flash modes | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red eye, Slow syncro |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/160 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i/24p), 1440 x 1080 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (25 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | MPEG-4 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 269 gr (0.59 lbs) | 121 gr (0.27 lbs) |
Dimensions | 110 x 63 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 93 x 56 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 79 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 13.0 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1089 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-FW50 | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $448 | $179 |