Sony a5100 vs Sony ZV-E10
89 Imaging
65 Features
74 Overall
68


86 Imaging
71 Features
92 Overall
79
Sony a5100 vs Sony ZV-E10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 283g - 110 x 63 x 36mm
- Launched August 2014
- Superseded the Sony a5000
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Boost to 51200)
- 3840 x 1920 video
- Sony E Mount
- 343g - 115 x 64 x 45mm
- Introduced July 2021

Sony a5100 vs. Sony ZV-E10: A Hands-On Comparison for Real-World Photography and Video
In the realm of entry-level mirrorless cameras, Sony’s a5100 and ZV-E10 pack a punch with their accessible pricing and user-friendly design. Yet, they target somewhat different users - the a5100 hails from 2014, with a compact, lightweight body perfect for casual shooters, while the ZV-E10 (2021) arrives as a vlog-friendly, hybrid cam aimed squarely at content creators. Having spent countless hours shooting with both, I’m excited to share a detailed, no-nonsense comparison that cuts through the marketing jargon to help you decide which Sony mirrorless works best for your photography and video ambitions.
We’ll cover everything from sensor tech and autofocus to ergonomics, real-life image quality, and video prowess. In doing so, I’ll weave in practical insights from my lab tests and field trials, shed light on the subtle tradeoffs between these siblings, and make clear recommendations based on actual use - perfect if you’re a photo enthusiast or a professional pondering your next upgrade.
Let’s dive in.
Size, Build, and Handling: Pocketable Charm vs. Grip Friendly Design
At a glance, the Sony a5100 and ZV-E10 both share that rangefinder-style mirrorless silhouette, but once you hold them side by side, their differences become evident.
The a5100 is a true cheapskate’s delight - light as a feather at 283 grams with a slim 110 x 63 x 36 mm footprint. It’s designed for pure portability with minimalist controls. This makes it great for street photographers and travelers who hate bulk.
On the flip side, the ZV-E10 bulks up to 343 grams, stretching to 115 x 64 x 45 mm. That extra heft comes with a more substantial grip, making it comfortable for longer shooting sessions, especially with heavier lenses. If you’re a content creator or enthusiast who prefers dedicated buttons and clubs for thumbs (a.k.a. the programmable controls on the top and rear), the ZV-E10 feels far more intentional.
Notably, the a5100 lacks a built-in EVF and has a minimal top plate with limited buttons - basically, a shutter, a mode dial on top, and a dedicated function button. The ZV-E10, meanwhile, ditches the EVF too but adds a hot shoe for external flashes or microphones and packs in better connectivity ports like mic and headphone jacks. For any video enthusiast, that’s a big deal.
The fully articulating (flip-out) LCD on the ZV-E10 - compared to the tilting screen on the a5100 - is a hallmark of its vlogging pedigree, making self-framing easier for solo shooters.
In short: if pure pocketability and featherweight design top your wish list, the a5100 wins. But for a better grip, more controls, and video-friendly usability, the ZV-E10 takes the cake.
Sensor and Image Quality: Same Size, Different Flavor
Both cameras sport the same APS-C sized CMOS sensor at around 23.5 x 15.6 mm - that’s a pleasant middle ground between tiny compacts and bulky full-frame bodies. The megapixel count of 24MP is also a shared spec, meaning resolution-wise, your prints and crops can be equally detailed.
However, don’t let identical sensor dimensions fool you. The a5100 uses Sony’s 2014-era Bionz X processor, while the newer ZV-E10 boasts improvements in sensor design (including backside illumination) and image processing tweaks - even though Sony hasn’t explicitly detailed the processor name.
Real-world impact? The ZV-E10 exhibits noticeably better dynamic range (meaning it holds highlight and shadow detail more gracefully), plus it goes louder with a maximum native ISO of 32,000 (expandable to 51,200) versus the a5100’s ISO ceiling of 25,600. In practical terms, this translates to cleaner images in low light and fewer noisy pixels in shadows.
DXOmark benchmarking (a trusted industry standard) scores the a5100 with an overall 80 points - a solid midrange rating for its vintage. The ZV-E10 has not yet been officially tested by DXO, but field tests show a tangible leap in color depth and exposure latitude.
For reference:
- The a5100 scores about 23.8 bits of color depth and a dynamic range near 12.7 EV
- ZV-E10’s new sensor architecture suggests improvements in both, especially in retaining highlight details during contrasty scenes like landscapes.
Autofocus: A Tale of Speed and Accuracy
Both cameras feature hybrid autofocus combining phase and contrast detection, but their AF point counts couldn’t be more different.
- a5100 offers 179 points
- ZV-E10 boasts 425 focus points
This doesn’t just look good on paper - the ZV-E10’s denser AF grid means better tracking, accuracy, and responsiveness. I ran repeated tests in various lighting and subject scenarios: portrait eye detection, wildlife tracking, and sports bursts. The ZV-E10 confidently nailed eye detection for humans and animals (the latter is absent on the a5100 outright), maintaining sharp focus on moving beasts at a distance. The a5100 often struggled with moving subjects and lacked animal eye AF.
Continuous autofocus and face tracking were also smoother on the ZV-E10, making it a better pick if you shoot unpredictable subjects or fast action.
Ergonomics and User Interface: Touchscreen and Articulation
The 3-inch touchscreen on both cameras is bright and responsive, though resolution is practically identical (922K dots on a5100, 920K on ZV-E10). However, the ZV-E10’s fully articulating screen swings around 180 degrees, perfect for selfie or vlog framing, whereas the a5100’s tilting screen only flips upward about 90 degrees.
Touch interfaces on both allow focus point selection and menu navigation, but the newer UI on the ZV-E10 is more intuitive, reflecting Sony’s improvements over the years.
The lack of an external EVF on both models may turn off some traditional photographers who rely on eye-level framing. If you’re comfortable composing with live view only, this won’t be a dealbreaker.
Lens Ecosystem Compatibility: How Flexible Are They?
Both cameras mount Sony E lenses, leveraging the extensive lineup Sony’s developed since 2010. The a5100 lists compatibility with over 121 lenses - the ZV-E10 ups the ante with 150 lenses as of 2024.
Practically speaking, both cameras support everything from compact primes to hefty telephotos, and both work well with Sony’s quality G Master optics, which are fantastic for portraits, macro, and telephoto wildlife shots.
Compatibility extends to third-party manufacturers too: Sigma, Tamron, and Tokina offer solid options.
If lens selection and future-proofing are top priorities, the ZV-E10’s newer mount firmware and more recent autofocus systems ensure better communication and faster AF on some lenses, especially with video autofocus. The a5100, being older, may not benefit from recent lens AF algorithm improvements or lens aberration correction during capture.
Burst Rates and Shutter Specs: Action Shooters Take Note
Contemporary shooters often prioritize burst speed for fast action like sports or wildlife.
- Sony a5100 maxes out at 6 fps continuous shooting
- ZV-E10 doubles that to 11 fps
Eleven frames per second gives you a better chance of capturing that perfect moment in athletic or wildlife photography. Factor in the ZV-E10’s superior autofocus tracking, and it’s clear who wins in this arena.
Both models share the same mechanical shutter speed range (30s to 1/4000s), so capturing motion blur or fast freezing action at shutter priority or full manual is a wash.
Weather Resistance and Durability: Minimal Protection for Both
Neither the a5100 nor the ZV-E10 offers environmental sealing or robust protection against dust and moisture. Neither is waterproof, shockproof, or crushproof.
If you require a camera that resists the elements (say, rugged landscape shoots in mist or rain), neither is your go-to. You’ll need to invest in protective rain covers or plan to shoot in controlled environments.
Video Capabilities: ZV-E10 Leads the Vlog Revolution
If the phrase “entry-level mirrorless” prompts you to think of video as an afterthought, prepare to be surprised.
The a5100 shoots 1080p video at up to 60 frames per second with the ability to record in AVCHD, MPEG-4, and Sony’s XAVC S codec. However, it lacks 4K recording altogether, and video-friendly features like a mic input or headphone jack aren’t present. No external audio inputs mean relying on the inbuilt microphone (which is, frankly, below average for sound quality).
By contrast, the ZV-E10 is a bona fide video workhorse. It shoots UHD 4K at 30 fps max and 1080p at up to 120 fps for slow-motion effects. The camera supports both mic and headphone jacks, allowing you to plug in external microphones and monitor audio on the fly - crucial for professional content creation. Beyond hardware, it supports S-Log profiles, giving video editors greater dynamic range in grading.
Despite lacking in-body image stabilization, you can pair the ZV-E10 with stabilized lenses for smooth footage. Additionally, the fully articulating screen and improved autofocus tracking provide a seamless selfie and vlogging experience.
For anyone serious about hybrid photo/video work or YouTube-style content, the choice here is crystal clear.
Battery Life and Storage: Small Differences Matter
Battery life rates clock in around 400 shots on the a5100 and slightly higher at 440 shots on the ZV-E10, based on manufacturer estimates. In real-world conditions, both cameras will get you through about a full day of casual shooting, but heavy video users will want extra batteries.
Both cameras use the same NP-FW50 battery pack and accept SD cards (SDHC/SDXC) and Sony’s proprietary Memory Stick formats. The ZV-E10 benefits from faster USB 3.2 connectivity for transferring large video files versus the a5100’s USB 2.0 port.
Real-World Genre Performance: What Each Camera Excels At
Let’s break down how each camera fares across various photography disciplines based on my practical tests and scoring metrics.
Portrait Photography
- Sony a5100: Produces pleasing skin tones with a slight softness, thanks to the older sensor and processor; focus is decent but can miss fast eye-catching moments; bokeh is respectable with the right lens but overall slower AF reduces keeper rate.
- Sony ZV-E10: Superior eye detection for humans and animals lifts portrait sharpness; with more focus points and faster AF, you get crisper shots and smoother subject tracking.
Winner: ZV-E10 for clear, sharp portraits with better AF confidence.
Landscape Photography
- a5100: Delivers solid dynamic range for mid-tier landscapes; 24MP resolution ensures good prints; lack of weather sealing requires caution in challenging environments.
- ZV-E10: Improved sensor allows better highlight retention, richer color depth, and overall cleaner RAW files; same weather sealing limitations apply.
Winner: ZV-E10, marginally better dynamic range and colors for landscapes.
Wildlife Photography
- a5100: Modest burst speed and autofocus tracking limit action shots; no animal eye AF means some frustration.
- ZV-E10: Fast 11fps shooting, expanded AF points, and animal eye detection boost keeper rate substantially.
Winner: ZV-E10, hands down.
Sports Photography
- a5100: Usable for slower sports; AF can lag behind fast-moving subjects.
- ZV-E10: Faster continuous shooting and autofocus tracking ability make it much better for sports shooters on a budget.
Winner: ZV-E10.
Street Photography
- a5100: Its compactness and tilt screen make it nearly invisible on the street, great for candid shots.
- ZV-E10: Slightly larger and heavier, plus its articulating screen may draw attention, but faster AF and burst can benefit action-packed street scenes.
Winner: a5100 for pure stealth; ZV-E10 if you prioritize performance.
Macro Photography
- Both cameras rely more on lens choice here. The robust autofocus across the frame on ZV-E10 improves focus precision for close-ups. Lack of in-body stabilization on both cameras means tripod use is recommended.
Winner: Slight edge to ZV-E10 for AF precision.
Night and Astro Photography
- The ZV-E10’s higher ISO range and cleaner noise performance allow for longer exposures with less grain. The a5100 is usable but noisier at higher ISOs.
Winner: ZV-E10.
Video
- a5100: 1080p max, limited audio options.
- ZV-E10: 4K, microphone and headphone jacks, high frame rate slow motion.
Winner: ZV-E10 by miles.
Travel Photography
- a5100: Ultra-lightweight and pocketable for long treks and quick snaps.
- ZV-E10: Still compact, but heavier with more versatile controls.
Winner: a5100 for pure portability; ZV-E10 if you want hybrid capabilities on the go.
Professional Work
- Neither camera targets pro workflows fully, given the lack of EVF, weather sealing, and limited file management. The ZV-E10, with improved video specs and better autofocus, is better suited for serious digital content pros on a budget.
Hands-On Sample Images: What You Can Expect
In day-to-day shooting, the a5100 produces sharp, colorful images with decent contrast. However, in backlit or contrast-heavy scenes, the ZV-E10’s files show better dynamic range and highlight preservation.
Portrait shots from the ZV-E10 reveal noticeably better eye sharpness and creamy bokeh when paired with fast primes. Wildlife action sequences are clearer with fewer missed autofocus moments compared to the a5100.
In low light, the ZV-E10 maintains better color fidelity with less luminance noise.
Final Verdict: Which Sony Entry-Level Mirrorless Should You Buy?
Here’s the nutshell summary:
Feature | Sony a5100 | Sony ZV-E10 |
---|---|---|
Launch Date | 2014 | 2021 |
Body Weight | 283g | 343g |
Sensor | 24MP APS-C CMOS | 24MP APS-C CMOS (newer BSI sensor) |
Burst Speed | 6 fps | 11 fps |
Autofocus Points | 179 | 425 (with animal eye AF) |
Built-in Flash | Yes | No |
LCD Screen | 3" Tilting, Touchscreen | 3" Fully Articulating, Touchscreen |
EVF | None | None |
Video | 1080p up to 60fps | 4K 30p, 1080p 120fps with mic in |
Battery Life | Approx 400 shots | Approx 440 shots |
Price (USD) | ~$450 | ~$700 |
Pros and Cons:
Sony a5100 Pros:
- Compact and lightweight
- Touchscreen tilting display
- Built-in flash for quick fill
- Very affordable for APS-C quality
Sony a5100 Cons:
- No EVF or articulating screen
- Slower burst and autofocus
- No mic/headphone ports for video
- Older sensor and image processor
Sony ZV-E10 Pros:
- Modern sensor and superior image quality
- Excellent autofocus system with animal eye tracking
- 4K video plus mic and headphone jacks
- Fully articulating touchscreen and better controls
- Faster burst rates
Sony ZV-E10 Cons:
- No built-in flash
- Larger and heavier than a5100
- Pricier
Who Should Buy Which?
-
Go for the Sony a5100 if:
You’re a beginner or casual shooter who needs a small, easy-to-carry camera primarily for still photography and who is on a tight budget. It’s ideal for street photographers, travelers, or anyone upgrading from smartphones wanting better image quality without complexity. -
Opt for the Sony ZV-E10 if:
You want a hybrid camera excellent for both stills and advanced video, crave the latest in autofocus accuracy, and like extra controls and connectivity options. Content creators, vloggers, wildlife or sports enthusiasts, and serious enthusiasts who want a step-up from basic cameras will benefit the most.
Closing Thoughts: Experience Matters
These cameras, though both entry-level mirrorless bodies, serve quite different users. The a5100 feels like an affordable, no-frills gateway into interchangeable-lens photography, while the ZV-E10 has evolved to meet modern content demands with beefed-up specs and video-centric features.
From my extensive testing, the ZV-E10 clearly shines in nearly every technical aspect - it’s smarter AF, richer video, and more ergonomic controls tip the scales. But if weight and budget are your absolute priorities, the a5100 remains a respectable contender, especially for still photography novices.
Ultimately, weigh your needs against budget and shooting style. For casual shooters who want straightforward, great-enough photos, the a5100 keeps it simple. For those who want flexibility, speed, and multifunction greatness in photography and video, the ZV-E10 is a wise investment.
Thanks for reading! If you’re still on the fence or want hands-on advice, feel free to reach out. I’m a huge fan of trying cameras first to see if their vibe matches your shooting passion.
Happy shooting!
Additional visual recap for quick browsing:
Sony a5100 vs Sony ZV-E10 Specifications
Sony Alpha a5100 | Sony ZV-E10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Sony | Sony |
Model type | Sony Alpha a5100 | Sony ZV-E10 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2014-08-17 | 2021-07-30 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Bionz X | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 32000 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 179 | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Sony E | Sony E |
Total lenses | 121 | 150 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 922k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 6.0fps | 11.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Flash off, auto, fill-flaw, slow sync, redeye reduction | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (120p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 3840 x 1920 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 1920 @ 25p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 100p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x1920 |
Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S | MPEG-4, XAVC S, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 283 gr (0.62 lbs) | 343 gr (0.76 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 63 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 115 x 64 x 45mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1347 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 400 photographs | 440 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-FW50 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous (3-5 shot)) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | With downloadable app | |
Storage type | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $448 | $699 |