Sony A6400 vs Sony T900
83 Imaging
69 Features
88 Overall
76
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Sony A6400 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Boost to 102400)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 403g - 120 x 67 x 50mm
- Introduced January 2019
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Released February 2009
Sony A6400 vs Sony T900 Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Sony A6400 vs Sony T900, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Ultracompact and they are both created by Sony. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the A6400 (24MP) and T900 (12MP) and the A6400 (APS-C) and T900 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe A6400 was unveiled 10 years after the T900 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Sony A6400 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the A6400 scores versus the T900 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sony A6400 vs Sony T900 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Sony Alpha a6400 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The full galleries are viewable at Sony A6400 Gallery and Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony A6400 over the Sony T900
A6400 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2019 | February 2009 | Newer by 121 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Sony A6400
T900 | A6400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Common features in the Sony A6400 and Sony T900
A6400 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Screen resolution | 922k | 922k | Exact same screen resolution | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Sony A6400 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and size. The Sony A6400 features exterior dimensions of 120mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") having a weight of 403 grams (0.89 lbs) while the Sony T900 has specifications of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Take a look at the Sony A6400 vs Sony T900 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the A6400 against the T900.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the A6400 and T900 is 83 and 96 respectively.
Sony A6400 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions only by going through specs. The image underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the A6400 and T900.
All in all, both of those cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The A6400 using its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Sony A6400 will provide more detail having an extra 12 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The fresher A6400 should have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Sony A6400 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sony A6400 vs Sony T900 Specifications
Sony Alpha a6400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Sony | Sony |
Model type | Sony Alpha a6400 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2019-01-15 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Bionz X | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 32000 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | 102400 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 425 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Sony E | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-10.0 |
Total lenses | 121 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3.5" |
Resolution of screen | 922k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,359k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.7x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 2 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 11.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Off, auto, on, slow sync, rear sync, redeye reduction, wireless, hi-speed sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, XAVC-S | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 403 gr (0.89 pounds) | 143 gr (0.32 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 83 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 24.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.6 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1431 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 410 shots | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-FW50 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick DUO (UHS-I compliant) | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $898 | $300 |