Sony H200 vs Sony RX10 III
Portability
67 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
67 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Portability
53 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
53 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
Sony H200 vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs
Sony H200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Released January 2013
Sony RX10 III
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
- Revealed March 2016
- Replaced the Sony RX10 II
- Updated by Sony RX10 IV
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Sony H200 vs Sony RX10 III Overview
Let's look more closely at the Sony H200 and Sony RX10 III, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom and they are both designed by Sony. The image resolution of the H200 (20MP) and the RX10 III (20MP) is pretty similar but the H200 (1/2.3") and RX10 III (1") enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe H200 was revealed 4 years prior to the RX10 III which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a brief summation of how the H200 scores versus the RX10 III with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Sony H200 vs Sony RX10 III Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III. The full galleries are provided at Sony H200 Gallery & Sony RX10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Sony RX10 III
| H200 | RX10 III |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Sony H200
| RX10 III | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | March 2016 |  | January 2013 | More modern by 39 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 1229k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+769k dot) |
Common features in the Sony H200 and Sony RX10 III
| H200 | RX10 III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Sony H200 vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Sony H200 enjoys outside measurements of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") having a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs) while the Sony RX10 III has sizing of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") along with a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).
Check the Sony H200 and Sony RX10 III in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select during that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the H200 versus the RX10 III.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the H200 and RX10 III is 67 and 53 respectively.
Sony H200 vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to see the difference between sensor sizes just by reading specifications. The pic underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the H200 and RX10 III.
Plainly, both of the cameras posses the exact same resolution albeit not the same sensor sizes. The H200 has the tinier sensor which is going to make getting shallower DOF trickier. The more aged H200 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Sony H200 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Sony H200
Portrait photography with Sony RX10 III
resolution is good (20MP)
comes with face detect autofocus
focusing manually not possible
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
manual focus
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (1")
provides face detect focusing
exports RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sony H200 Street photography info
Sony RX10 III Street photography info
has image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
more heavy than others in class (530 grams)
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is good (1")
exports RAW files
environment sealing
more heavy than average (1,051g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sony H200 Sports photography highlights
Sony RX10 III Sports photography highlights
excellent zoom range (24-633mm 26.4 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
comes with tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery pack (240 shots)
has no phase detect autofocus
long zoom range (24-600mm 25.0 x zoom)
quiet mode (1/32,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (20MP)
sensor size is good (1")
provides tracking focus
environment sealing
great battery power (420 shots)
no phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Sony H200 Travel photography info
Sony RX10 III Travel photography info
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
has built in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
very long reach (633mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
bad battery pack (240 per charge)
more heavy than others in class (530g)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
great battery power (420 per charge)
environment sealing
resolution is good (20MP)
built-in flash
quite wide (24mm)
very long zoom (600mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
more heavy than average (1,051 grams)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f2.4)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Sony H200
Landscape photography with Sony RX10 III
fairly wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
no manual exposure
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
bad battery pack (240 CIPA)
does not have Timelapse mode
manual focus
quite wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (1")
exports RAW files
environment sealing
great battery power (420 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.4)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Sony H200 Vlogging advice
Sony RX10 III Vlogging advice
fairly wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detect autofocus
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
display is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have microphone socket
more heavy than others in class (530 grams)
quite wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect focusing
video res high (3840 x 2160 resolution)
includes microphone jack
sluggish max aperture (f2.4)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
more heavy than average (1,051g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Sony H200 vs Sony RX10 III Specifications
| Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Sony | Sony |
| Model | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2013-01-08 | 2016-03-29 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 5184 x 2920 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | - | 64 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-633mm (26.4x) | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.4-4.0 |
| Macro focus range | 20cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 1,229k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | ClearPhoto LCD display | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames/s | 14.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.80 m | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 530g (1.17 lbs) | 1051g (2.32 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") | 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 70 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 472 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | 420 shots |
| Battery format | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $250 | $1,398 |