Sony H200 vs Sony RX10 IV
67 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
52 Imaging
53 Features
82 Overall
64
Sony H200 vs Sony RX10 IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1095g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Revealed September 2017
- Older Model is Sony RX10 III
Sony H200 vs Sony RX10 IV Overview
Here is a detailed assessment of the Sony H200 vs Sony RX10 IV, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom and both are created by Sony. The image resolution of the H200 (20MP) and the RX10 IV (20MP) is very similar but the H200 (1/2.3") and RX10 IV (1") use different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe H200 was released 5 years before the RX10 IV and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a simple summary of how the H200 scores vs the RX10 IV in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sony H200 vs Sony RX10 IV Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV. The complete galleries are available at Sony H200 Gallery & Sony RX10 IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Sony RX10 IV
H200 | RX10 IV |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 IV over the Sony H200
RX10 IV | H200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2017 | January 2013 | Fresher by 56 months | |
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1440k | 460k | Crisper display (+980k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Sony H200 and Sony RX10 IV
H200 | RX10 IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Sony H200 vs Sony RX10 IV Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Sony H200 features physical measurements of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") having a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs) while the Sony RX10 IV has sizing of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") having a weight of 1095 grams (2.41 lbs).
Examine the Sony H200 vs Sony RX10 IV in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the H200 compared to the RX10 IV.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the H200 and RX10 IV is 67 and 52 respectively.
Sony H200 vs Sony RX10 IV Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing simply by reviewing specifications. The visual here will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the H200 and RX10 IV.
Plainly, each of these cameras offer the same exact megapixels but different sensor sizing. The H200 provides the tinier sensor which will make getting bokeh more difficult. The older H200 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Sony H200 vs Sony RX10 IV Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sony H200 vs Sony RX10 IV Specifications
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Sony | Sony |
Model | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2013-01-08 | 2017-09-12 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 2920 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 315 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-633mm (26.4x) | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.4-4.0 |
Macro focus distance | 20cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 1,440 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | ClearPhoto LCD display | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames/s | 24.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 6.80 m | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/2000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 530 gr (1.17 lb) | 1095 gr (2.41 lb) |
Dimensions | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 shots | 400 shots |
Battery format | AA | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $250 | $1,698 |