Sony H200 vs Sony TX1
67 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Sony H200 vs Sony TX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 142g - 94 x 58 x 17mm
- Released August 2009
Sony H200 vs Sony TX1 Overview
The following is a in-depth comparison of the Sony H200 versus Sony TX1, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact and they are both offered by Sony. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the H200 (20MP) and TX1 (10MP) and the H200 (1/2.3") and TX1 (1/2.4") have totally different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe H200 was unveiled 3 years after the TX1 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sony TX1 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a simple view of how the H200 matches up versus the TX1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sony H200 vs Sony TX1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1. The full galleries are available at Sony H200 Gallery and Sony TX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Sony TX1
H200 | TX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | August 2009 | Newer by 42 months | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony TX1 over the Sony H200
TX1 | H200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Sony H200 and Sony TX1
H200 | TX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Lack of manual focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Sony H200 vs Sony TX1 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and size. The Sony H200 offers outer measurements of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") accompanied by a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs) and the Sony TX1 has specifications of 94mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Take a look at the Sony H200 versus Sony TX1 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the H200 compared to the TX1.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the H200 and TX1 is 67 and 96 respectively.
Sony H200 vs Sony TX1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to envision the difference in sensor dimensions merely by researching specifications. The image here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the H200 and TX1.
Plainly, both the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The H200 using its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Sony H200 will provide you with greater detail having an extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures more aggressively. The fresher H200 is going to have an edge in sensor technology.
Sony H200 vs Sony TX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sony H200 vs Sony TX1 Specifications
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Sony | Sony |
Model | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2013-01-08 | 2009-08-06 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.4" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 2920 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-633mm (26.4x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focus distance | 20cm | 8cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | ClearPhoto LCD display | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 2 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/1250 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 6.80 m | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 530 grams (1.17 lb) | 142 grams (0.31 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") | 94 x 58 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 shots | - |
Battery type | AA | - |
Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $250 | $350 |