Sony H200 vs Sony TX200V
67 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Sony H200 vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Released January 2012
Sony H200 vs Sony TX200V Overview
Here is a extended review of the Sony H200 vs Sony TX200V, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact and they are both designed by Sony. The image resolution of the H200 (20MP) and the TX200V (18MP) is fairly well matched and they come with the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe H200 was released 12 months later than the TX200V which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a quick view of how the H200 grades vs the TX200V with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sony H200 vs Sony TX200V Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The complete galleries are viewable at Sony H200 Gallery & Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Sony TX200V
H200 | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | January 2012 | Fresher by 12 months |
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Sony H200
TX200V | H200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3.3" | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1230k | 460k | Clearer display (+770k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Sony H200 and Sony TX200V
H200 | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | No manual focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Sony H200 vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Sony H200 offers outer dimensions of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") accompanied by a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs) while the Sony TX200V has proportions of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check the Sony H200 vs Sony TX200V in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the H200 vs the TX200V.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the H200 and TX200V is 67 and 96 respectively.
Sony H200 vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizing purely by looking at specifications. The photograph below will give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the H200 and TX200V.
Plainly, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Sony H200 to give greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The fresher H200 will have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Sony H200 vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sony H200 vs Sony TX200V Specifications
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Sony | Sony |
Model type | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2013-01-08 | 2012-01-30 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 18MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 2920 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-633mm (26.4x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 20cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3.3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 1,230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | ClearPhoto LCD display | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 2s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.80 m | 3.10 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 530g (1.17 lb) | 129g (0.28 lb) |
Dimensions | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photos | 220 photos |
Form of battery | AA | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $250 | $500 |