Sony H200 vs Sony TX55
67 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
97 Imaging
39 Features
46 Overall
41
Sony H200 vs Sony TX55 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 109g - 93 x 54 x 13mm
- Launched July 2011
Sony H200 vs Sony TX55 Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Sony H200 versus Sony TX55, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact and they are both designed by Sony. There is a big difference between the image resolutions of the H200 (20MP) and TX55 (16MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe H200 was unveiled 18 months after the TX55 which makes them a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sony TX55 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the H200 matches up against the TX55 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sony H200 vs Sony TX55 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55. The full galleries are available at Sony H200 Gallery and Sony TX55 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Sony TX55
H200 | TX55 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | July 2011 | More modern by 18 months |
Reasons to pick Sony TX55 over the Sony H200
TX55 | H200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Screen dimensions | 3.3" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 460k | Clearer screen (+770k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Sony H200 and Sony TX55
H200 | TX55 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Sony H200 vs Sony TX55 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Sony H200 provides physical measurements of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") having a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs) and the Sony TX55 has sizing of 93mm x 54mm x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5") having a weight of 109 grams (0.24 lbs).
Contrast the Sony H200 versus Sony TX55 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the H200 and the TX55.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the H200 and TX55 is 67 and 97 respectively.
Sony H200 vs Sony TX55 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizes only by going over technical specs. The picture here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the H200 and TX55.
As you can tell, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should count on the Sony H200 to offer you more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The fresher H200 provides an advantage in sensor technology.
Sony H200 vs Sony TX55 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sony H200 vs Sony TX55 Specifications
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Sony | Sony |
Model type | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2013-01-08 | 2011-07-24 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 2920 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-633mm (26.4x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focusing range | 20cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3.3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | ClearPhoto LCD display | XtraFine OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.80 m | 3.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 530g (1.17 lbs) | 109g (0.24 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") | 93 x 54 x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 pictures | 250 pictures |
Battery form | AA | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo | microSD/SDHC, Memory Stick Micro |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $250 | $350 |