Sony HX1 vs Sony TX200V
67 Imaging
32 Features
36 Overall
33
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Sony HX1 vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1440 x 1080 video
- 28-560mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
- 544g - 115 x 83 x 92mm
- Revealed April 2009
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Introduced January 2012
Sony HX1 vs Sony TX200V Overview
Lets look more closely at the Sony HX1 and Sony TX200V, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact and both are sold by Sony. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the HX1 (9MP) and TX200V (18MP) and the HX1 (1/2.4") and TX200V (1/2.3") provide different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe HX1 was announced 3 years earlier than the TX200V which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Sony HX1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the HX1 grades versus the TX200V in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sony HX1 vs Sony TX200V Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The whole galleries are available at Sony HX1 Gallery and Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony HX1 over the Sony TX200V
HX1 | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Sony HX1
TX200V | HX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2012 | April 2009 | More modern by 33 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3.3" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 230k | Sharper screen (+1000k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Sony HX1 and Sony TX200V
HX1 | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Sony HX1 vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Sony HX1 comes with exterior dimensions of 115mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.5" x 3.3" x 3.6") with a weight of 544 grams (1.20 lbs) and the Sony TX200V has measurements of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Examine the Sony HX1 and Sony TX200V in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the HX1 and the TX200V.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the HX1 and TX200V is 67 and 96 respectively.
Sony HX1 vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizes simply by checking specifications. The image here will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the HX1 and TX200V.
Plainly, both of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The HX1 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh easier and the Sony TX200V will resolve more detail with its extra 9 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged HX1 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Sony HX1 vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sony HX1 vs Sony TX200V Specifications
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Sony | Sony |
Model type | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2009-04-22 | 2012-01-30 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Bionz | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.4" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.104 x 4.578mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-560mm (20.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.2 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3.3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 2 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.20 m | 3.10 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Front Curtain, Rear Curtain | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1440x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 544 grams (1.20 lb) | 129 grams (0.28 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 115 x 83 x 92mm (4.5" x 3.3" x 3.6") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 photographs |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-FH50 | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $47,999 | $500 |