Sony HX100V vs Sony W320
66 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
97 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Sony HX100V vs Sony W320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 577g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
- Launched October 2011
- Later Model is Sony HX200V
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
- Launched January 2010
Sony HX100V vs Sony W320 Overview
Below is a in-depth analysis of the Sony HX100V vs Sony W320, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact and both are sold by Sony. The image resolution of the HX100V (16MP) and the W320 (14MP) is relatively comparable and they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe HX100V was introduced 22 months later than the W320 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Sony HX100V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sony W320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the HX100V grades versus the W320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sony HX100V vs Sony W320 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX100V and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320. The whole galleries are viewable at Sony HX100V Gallery and Sony W320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony HX100V over the Sony W320
HX100V | W320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2011 | January 2010 | More recent by 22 months | |
Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Sony HX100V
W320 | HX100V |
---|
Common features in the Sony HX100V and Sony W320
HX100V | W320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Sony HX100V vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Sony HX100V features outer measurements of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") and a weight of 577 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Sony W320 has dimensions of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") and a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Contrast the Sony HX100V vs Sony W320 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select at that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the HX100V versus the W320.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the HX100V and W320 is 66 and 97 respectively.
Sony HX100V vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to envision the contrast in sensor measurements merely by going through technical specs. The graphic underneath may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the HX100V and W320.
As you have seen, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Sony HX100V to provide more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more recent HX100V is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Sony HX100V vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sony HX100V vs Sony W320 Specifications
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX100V | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Sony | Sony |
Model | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX100V | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2011-10-21 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | BIONZ | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-810mm (30.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/2.7-5.7 |
Macro focus range | - | 4cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 921k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | XtraFine LCD display with TruBlack technology | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 1s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 12.70 m | 4.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 577 gr (1.27 pounds) | 117 gr (0.26 pounds) |
Dimensions | 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") | 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-FH50 | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $429 | $269 |