Sony HX10V vs Sony A58
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43


68 Imaging
62 Features
72 Overall
66
Sony HX10V vs Sony A58 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-400mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 234g - 105 x 60 x 34mm
- Released February 2012
- Renewed by Sony HX20V
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 16000 (Push to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 492g - 129 x 95 x 78mm
- Introduced November 2013
- Previous Model is Sony A57

Sony HX10V vs Sony A58: A Hands-On Showdown Between Compact Superzoom and Entry-Level DSLR
When it comes to picking your next camera, the choice often boils down to a balancing act between convenience and creative control - and I’ve had the pleasure (and sometimes frustration) of testing both compact superzooms and DSLRs over the years. Today, I’m diving into the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX10V, a compact superzoom powerhouse from 2012, and the Sony SLT-A58, an entry-level DSLR from 2013 featuring Sony’s translucent mirror tech.
These two cameras broke different ground when they launched. The HX10V represents the grab-and-go, all-in-one travel companion, while the A58 targets the budding enthusiast craving more image quality and manual control without breaking the bank. Let’s explore where their strengths and shortcomings lie across various genres and how they stand up technically - so you can decide which fits your style and budget.
First Impressions: Size, Handling, and Design
The HX10V is delightfully pocketable. Measuring 105 x 60 x 34 mm and weighing just 234 grams, it’s a natural choice when travel light is the mantra. It slips easily into a jacket pocket or purse without imposing bulk. However, that compactness translates into a smaller handgrip, which might not suit folks with larger hands or those who prefer a club for their thumbs.
In contrast, the A58 is a traditional DSLR-type body, larger at 129 x 95 x 78 mm and almost double the weight (492 grams). Its heft offers a substantial grip which I found much more comfortable during extended handheld sessions, especially with heavier lenses. The increased size also means more room for physical controls and better balance with pro or semi-pro glass.
Both feature distinct top and rear control layouts. Peep at this top view comparison to see their respective dials and buttons:
The HX10V’s fixed lens limits complexity yet retains direct access to key settings like exposure compensation and manual mode. The A58’s more detailed control spread, including shutter and aperture priority modes, lets the photographer quickly tweak settings on the fly - a big plus for precision-oriented shooters.
Who benefits? If you’re a minimalist, or need something ultra-portable that doesn’t demand extra lenses, the HX10V wins points. However, if ergonomics and physical controls are your thing, especially for longer sessions or larger lenses, the A58 feels more grounded.
Peering Under the Hood: Sensor Technology and Image Quality
Image quality is where things start to diverge sharply. Both cameras sport Sony’s BSI-CMOS sensors but differ drastically in size and resolution.
- Sony HX10V: A tiny 1/2.3-inch sensor measuring 6.17 x 4.55 mm, delivering 18 megapixels.
- Sony A58: An APS-C sized sensor measuring 23.2 x 15.4 mm, with 20 megapixels.
Sensor size massively influences noise performance, dynamic range, and depth of field control. The A58’s sensor is about 12.4 times larger in area than the HX10V’s, giving it a significant edge in capturing light and rendering details, especially in challenging lighting conditions.
Through extensive real-world testing (and countless test charts), the A58 consistently produces cleaner images at higher ISOs, with better color depth and dynamic range. The HX10V’s small sensor struggles in low light, introducing noise and reduced detail as you push ISO beyond 400-800.
If you peek at DxOMark’s scores (though the HX10V hasn’t been tested there), the A58’s color depth (23.3 bits), dynamic range (12.5 EV), and low light ISO score (753) reflect typical APS-C strengths. The compact’s purely consumer-grade sensor is a mixed bag, adequate for casual use but limited for serious image quality hunts.
Real-world significance: For landscape photographers hunting detail in shadows and highlights or portrait shooters craving luscious skin tones and bokeh, the A58 is a clear winner. Those snapping casual travel photos and sharing on social media will appreciate the HX10V’s convenience, but image quality takes a backseat.
Viewing and Composing: Screens and Viewfinders
Composing your shot is both an art and a science. Here, the differences in interface design further underscore the cameras’ target users.
The HX10V sports a fixed 3-inch XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD with 922K dots - bright and quite sharp for its class, though it lacks touch functionality. The fixed nature means limited creative angles when shooting, say, low to the ground or over crowds. Its screen equates to basic composition needs but doesn’t offer much flair.
The A58 counters with a tilt LCD of 2.7 inches and 460K-dot resolution. The lower pixel count is noticeable, but the tilt mechanism grants compositional flexibility uncommon in entry DSLRs. More importantly, the A58 boasts a 1,440-dot EVF with 100% coverage and 0.65x magnification that makes framing in bright sunlight a breeze without relying solely on the LCD.
Viewfinder usability is a cardinal point for action, sports, and street shooters - I can attest that the A58’s electronic finder gives a real-time preview with exposure settings visible, whereas the HX10V relies wholly on the LCD, which can falter under strong sunlight.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Tracking Your Subject in the Wild
Both Sony models take different autofocus routes: the HX10V leans on contrast-detection AF with 9 points, while the A58 combines phase-detection AF with 15 points (including 3 cross-type sensors) via its translucent mirror tech.
I tested both in various scenarios:
- Wildlife & sports: The A58’s phase-detection system is notably quicker and more reliable for tracking moving subjects, locking focus swiftly even under complex scenes. Burst mode at 8 fps lets you capture fleeting moments better than the HX10V’s 10 fps contrast-based burst (which tends to hunt and miss during sustained bursts).
- Portraits: Both handle face detection, but the A58’s selective AF modes allow choosing specific focus points or multi-area focus, giving more control over framing and focus precision. The HX10V’s limited AF area and single-point AF make critical focus on eyes less dependable.
- Macro: The HX10V shines a bit here with a modest 5 cm minimum focus distance, letting enthusiasts get close to subjects. The A58’s focusing precision is better with suitable macro lenses but requires acquiring dedicated glass.
Bottom line? For active shooting - moving subjects, sports, or wildlife - the A58 is leagues ahead in AF speed and accuracy. The HX10V suffices for casual static subjects or controlled environments but won’t cut it in fast-paced settings.
Lens Ecosystem and Versatility: Fixed Zoom versus Interchangeable Systems
One of the big decisions - fixed lens or interchangeable system? The HX10V comes with a fixed 24–400mm equivalent zoom lens (F3.3–5.9), a versatile range for travel and general photography without fussing about lenses.
The A58 is compatible with Sony/Minolta Alpha mount lenses, which clocks in at over 140 options. This includes everything from fast primes, specialized macro lenses, telephoto zooms ideal for wildlife, and wide-angle glass for landscapes.
Here’s where you see the trade-off clearly:
- HX10V:
- Pros: No extra cost or bulk of lenses, convenient all-in-one, decent reach thanks to 16.7× zoom.
- Cons: Aperture slows significantly at telephoto end, limited creative control, fixed lens limits flexibility.
- A58:
- Pros: Full creative freedom with lenses, control over depth of field, better optical performance depending on glass quality.
- Cons: Additional cost for lenses, more to carry, learning curve with lens choices.
This upfront cost and investment hurdle shouldn't deter you, especially if you seek quality. For example, swapping a kit lens for a fast 50mm f/1.8 prime on the A58 instantly boosts portrait bokeh and night performance - magic not achievable with the compact.
Real-World Performance by Photography Genre
Let’s break down how each camera performs in popular shooting styles:
Portrait Photography
- A58: Benefits from larger sensor, interchangeable fast lenses, face detection, and selective AF points for sharp eye focus. Produces beautiful skin tones and background separation.
- HX10V: Decent skin tones in good light, but limited bokeh control and less reliable face detection due to contrast AF.
Landscape Photography
- A58: Greater dynamic range allows capturing scenes with deep shadows and bright highlights. High resolution images hold up for large prints. No weather sealing, though.
- HX10V: Smaller sensor limits dynamic range and detail, but wide-angle end can capture sweeping views. No weather sealing.
Wildlife & Sports
- A58: Faster, accurate autofocus; 8 fps burst allows capturing decisive moments; lenses can tailor reach and speed.
- HX10V: 10 fps burst is quick but focus acquisition lags; limited zoom aperture and slower reliable focus in low light.
Street Photography
- HX10V: Compact size and quiet operation aid candid shooting; no viewfinder is a minor inconvenience.
- A58: Bulkier, but electronic viewfinder useful for framing in bright scenes; faster autofocus could snap action on the fly.
Macro Photography
- A58: Superior focus precision with macro lenses; sensor size gives better detail.
- HX10V: Closer minimum focus distance on fixed lens, handy for insect or flower shots at casual level.
Night & Astrophotography
- A58: Larger sensor and higher native ISO allow cleaner low-light performance; shooting RAW supports advanced noise reduction.
- HX10V: Noise at ISO beyond 400 hampers image quality; no RAW support limits post processing.
Video Capabilities
Both shoot 1080p video but with caveats.
- A58: Supports MPEG-4, AVCHD, and H.264 codecs; microphone port adds sound control; sensor-based stabilization helps reduce shakes.
- HX10V: Records 1080p at 60 fps AVCHD and MPEG-4, but lacks microphone input and advanced video features.
Neither supports 4K or advanced video options, but the A58’s mic port might appeal more to vloggers or content creators.
Battery Life and Storage Flexibility
Battery endurance can shape shooting plans.
- HX10V: Rated for 320 shots per charge; small battery (NP-BG1) is light but limits shooting volume; suitable for short day trips.
- A58: Nearly doubles battery life at 690 shots on the NP-FM500H; better suited for day-long outings or professional work without frequent recharging.
Both use single card slots supporting SD/SDHC/SDXC. The HX10V also supports Memory Stick formats - a feature less relevant today. USB 2.0 and HDMI connections are standard but no wireless features beyond Eye-Fi support, which requires specific cards.
Build Quality and Weather Sealing
Neither camera offers robust weather sealing or rugged construction. Both are primarily designed for casual or enthusiast use without hardcore environmental resistance.
The HX10V’s compact plastic body feels solid but minimal, while the A58 has a more substantial chassis with ergonomic rubber grips but no dust/waterproof promises.
Your Buying Guide: Choosing Based on Budget and Needs
Go for the Sony HX10V if you:
- Prioritize ultimate portability and lightweight design.
- Want an affordable, all-in-one superzoom with good image quality for casual use.
- Are a frequent traveler who needs versatility without packing lenses.
- Value simplicity and point-and-shoot ease over manual control.
- Plan mostly daylight, well-lit shooting.
Pick the Sony A58 if you:
- Crave better image quality and dynamic range thanks to the APS-C sensor.
- Desire ultimate control over exposure with dedicated modes and physical dials.
- Are willing to invest in additional lenses for creative versatility.
- Need reliable autofocus for action, wildlife, or sports.
- Shoot RAW and want to fine-tune images in post-production.
- Need longer battery life for extended shoots.
Summing Up Performance and Value
The A58 comfortably outperforms the HX10V across nearly every technical and real-world metric except portability. Its robust sensor, phase-detection AF, and lens flexibility make it a solid entry-level DSLR choice, especially given its modest price tag (~$645).
Meanwhile, the HX10V’s strength lies in convenience and travel versatility. Though dated and limited in advanced features, it remains an approachable superzoom for budget-conscious photographers seeking an all-in-one.
Sample Images Showcase
To truly appreciate the differences beyond specs, here’s a selection of side-by-side shots taken in identical lighting conditions with both cameras:
Notice the A58’s superior sharpness, color fidelity, and dynamic range, especially visible in shadow detail and subtle tones. The HX10V’s images are no slouch for small prints or web use but fall short when scrutinized.
The Final Verdict: Who Wins?
If you want my personal take after testing both extensively: the Sony A58 is the better camera by far for anyone who values image quality, creative control, and future-proofing with lenses. Its slight size and weight penalty is justified by superior results and flexibility.
The Sony HX10V may appeal if your priorities are compactness, ease, and a superb zoom range with minimal fuss - perfect as a travel or secondary camera on a tight budget.
Both have a place, but don’t fool yourself thinking the HX10V is competing on image quality grounds - it’s simply too small a sensor and dated now. The A58, while an older DSLR design, still offers features and output that hold up well today.
I hope this detailed comparison helps clear the fog on these Sony contenders and points you toward the right tool for your photographic journey. If you have niche needs or questions, feel free to ask - after all, picking the right camera is just the beginning of the fun!
Happy shooting!
-
- Your friendly neighborhood camera gear junkie and tester*
Sony HX10V vs Sony A58 Specifications
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX10V | Sony SLT-A58 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Sony | Sony |
Model | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX10V | Sony SLT-A58 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2012-02-28 | 2013-11-27 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | BIONZ | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.2 x 15.4mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 357.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4896 x 3672 | 5456 x 3632 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 16000 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 15 |
Cross focus points | - | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 24-400mm (16.7x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.6 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.65x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.30 m | 10.00 m (@ ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 234 grams (0.52 pounds) | 492 grams (1.08 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 60 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 129 x 95 x 78mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 74 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.3 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 753 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 shots | 690 shots |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-BG1 | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $616 | $645 |