Clicky

Sony HX200V vs Sony RX10 III

Portability
66
Imaging
42
Features
55
Overall
47
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III front
Portability
53
Imaging
52
Features
77
Overall
62

Sony HX200V vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs

Sony HX200V
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
  • 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
  • Revealed May 2012
  • Succeeded the Sony HX100V
  • Updated by Sony HX300
Sony RX10 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
  • 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
  • Introduced March 2016
  • Superseded the Sony RX10 II
  • Replacement is Sony RX10 IV
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sony HX200V vs Sony RX10 III Overview

In this write-up, we are matching up the Sony HX200V versus Sony RX10 III, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom and they are both built by Sony. The image resolution of the HX200V (18MP) and the RX10 III (20MP) is very well matched but the HX200V (1/2.3") and RX10 III (1") use totally different sensor dimensions.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The HX200V was announced 4 years earlier than the RX10 III which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).

Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a concise summation of how the HX200V grades vs the RX10 III with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Sony RX10 III

 HX200V RX10 III 

Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Sony HX200V

 RX10 III HX200V 
IntroducedMarch 2016May 2012More modern by 47 months
Display resolution1229k922kSharper display (+307k dot)

Common features in the Sony HX200V and Sony RX10 III

 HX200V RX10 III 
Manually focus Dial precise focus
Display typeTiltingTiltingTilting display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display sizing
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither offers Touch friendly display

Sony HX200V vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Sony HX200V offers outside dimensions of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") with a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs) and the Sony RX10 III has specifications of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") accompanied by a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).

Analyze the Sony HX200V versus Sony RX10 III in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the HX200V and the RX10 III.

Sony HX200V vs Sony RX10 III size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the HX200V and RX10 III is 66 and 53 respectively.

Sony HX200V vs Sony RX10 III top view buttons comparison

Sony HX200V vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very difficult to see the difference between sensor sizes purely by looking at a spec sheet. The image here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the HX200V and RX10 III.

As you can see, both the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The HX200V with its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field harder and the Sony RX10 III will resolve more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged HX200V is going to be behind in sensor technology.

Sony HX200V vs Sony RX10 III sensor size comparison

Sony HX200V vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder

Sony HX200V vs Sony RX10 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Sony HX200V as a Portrait photography camera
Sony RX10 III as a Portrait photography camera
45
has manual focus
megapixel count good (18 megapixels)
offers face detect autofocus
can't use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
71
you can focus manually
decent MP (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (1")
has face detect focus
saves RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Sony HX200V Street photography features
Sony RX10 III Street photography features
51
tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
more heavy than competition (583 grams)
64
screen tilts
built in image stabilization (Optical)
nice sensor size (1")
saves RAW files
weather proofing
heavier than competition in class (1,051 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sony HX200V as a Sports photography camera
Sony RX10 III as a Sports photography camera
56
excellent zoom range (27-810mm 30.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (18MP)
offers tracking focus
great battery power (450 shots)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
70
long zoom range (24-600mm 25.0 x zoom)
silent mode (1/32,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (20MP)
nice sensor size (1")
has tracking focus
weather proofing
good battery (420 CIPA)
lacks phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Sony HX200V as a Travel photography camera
Sony RX10 III as a Travel photography camera
57
great battery power (450 shots)
megapixel count good (18 megapixels)
built-in flash
quite wide (27mm)
long zoom (810mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition (583g)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
55
good battery (420 per charge)
weather proofing
decent MP (20MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
long zoom (600mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition in class (1,051g)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.4)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Sony HX200V as a Landscape photography camera
Sony RX10 III as a Landscape photography camera
50
has manual focus
quite wide (27mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (18MP)
great battery power (450 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse recording
63
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (1")
saves RAW files
weather proofing
good battery (420 per charge)
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.4)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Sony HX200V Vlogging information
Sony RX10 III Vlogging information
27
quite wide (27mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
doesn't have microphone jack
more heavy than competition (583g)
28
reasonably wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focus
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 pxls)
includes mic support
sluggish max aperture (f2.4)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
heavier than competition in class (1,051g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sony HX200V vs Sony RX10 III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sony HX200V and Sony RX10 III
 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200VSony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
General Information
Brand Sony Sony
Model Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Large Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2012-05-11 2016-03-29
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor Chip BIONZ Bionz X
Sensor type BSI-CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 18 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4896 x 3672 5472 x 3648
Highest native ISO 12800 12800
Highest boosted ISO - 25600
Minimum native ISO 100 125
RAW pictures
Minimum boosted ISO - 64
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 9 25
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 27-810mm (30.0x) 24-600mm (25.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-5.6 f/2.4-4.0
Macro focus range 1cm 3cm
Crop factor 5.8 2.7
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Tilting
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 922 thousand dots 1,229 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.7x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Maximum silent shutter speed - 1/32000s
Continuous shooting rate 10.0fps 14.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 12.40 m 10.80 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 3840x2160
Video file format MPEG-4, AVCHD MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 583 gr (1.29 lb) 1051 gr (2.32 lb)
Dimensions 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 70
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.1
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.6
DXO Low light score not tested 472
Other
Battery life 450 images 420 images
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NP-FH50 NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Card slots One One
Price at launch $480 $1,398