Sony HX200V vs Sony W320
66 Imaging
42 Features
55 Overall
47
97 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Sony HX200V vs Sony W320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
- Revealed May 2012
- Succeeded the Sony HX100V
- Replacement is Sony HX300
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2010
Sony HX200V vs Sony W320 Overview
Following is a thorough comparison of the Sony HX200V versus Sony W320, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact and both are sold by Sony. There exists a significant gap between the image resolutions of the HX200V (18MP) and W320 (14MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe HX200V was brought out 2 years after the W320 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Sony HX200V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sony W320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick view of how the HX200V matches up vs the W320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sony HX200V vs Sony W320 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320. The entire galleries are available at Sony HX200V Gallery and Sony W320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Sony W320
HX200V | W320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2012 | January 2010 | More modern by 29 months | |
Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 230k | Crisper screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Sony HX200V
W320 | HX200V |
---|
Common features in the Sony HX200V and Sony W320
HX200V | W320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Sony HX200V vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Sony HX200V provides outer dimensions of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") along with a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs) and the Sony W320 has specifications of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") and a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Take a look at the Sony HX200V versus Sony W320 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the HX200V vs the W320.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the HX200V and W320 is 66 and 97 respectively.
Sony HX200V vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to see the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reviewing specifications. The picture here will offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the HX200V and W320.
To sum up, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Sony HX200V to offer you more detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures more aggressively. The fresher HX200V is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Sony HX200V vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sony HX200V vs Sony W320 Specifications
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Sony | Sony |
Model | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2012-05-11 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | BIONZ | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4896 x 3672 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-810mm (30.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/2.7-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 4cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 922k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 1s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 12.40 m | 4.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 583g (1.29 lbs) | 117g (0.26 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") | 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 450 images | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-FH50 | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $480 | $269 |