Sony HX200V vs Sony WX50
Portability
66 Imaging
42 Features
55 Overall
47
66 Imaging
42 Features
55 Overall
47
Portability
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Sony HX200V vs Sony WX50 Key Specs
Sony HX200V
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
- Revealed May 2012
- Earlier Model is Sony HX100V
- Replacement is Sony HX300
Sony WX50
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-125mm (F2.6-6.3) lens
- 117g - 92 x 52 x 19mm
- Released January 2012
Photography Glossary Sony HX200V vs Sony WX50 Overview
Here is a thorough analysis of the Sony HX200V vs Sony WX50, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are created by Sony. The sensor resolution of the HX200V (18MP) and the WX50 (16MP) is relatively well matched and they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe HX200V was released 4 months later than the WX50 and they are both of a similar age. Both cameras come with different body type with the Sony HX200V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sony WX50 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a short summation of how the HX200V matches up vs the WX50 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Sony HX200V vs Sony WX50 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50. The complete galleries are available at Sony HX200V Gallery & Sony WX50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Sony WX50
| HX200V | WX50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 461k | Clearer screen (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony WX50 over the Sony HX200V
| WX50 | HX200V |
|---|
Common features in the Sony HX200V and Sony WX50
| HX200V | WX50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2012 |  | January 2012 | Similar age |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Sony HX200V vs Sony WX50 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Sony HX200V features external dimensions of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") along with a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs) whilst the Sony WX50 has measurements of 92mm x 52mm x 19mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Compare the Sony HX200V vs Sony WX50 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the HX200V vs the WX50.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the HX200V and WX50 is 66 and 96 respectively.
Sony HX200V vs Sony WX50 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizing just by checking specifications. The photograph here should give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the HX200V and WX50.
To sum up, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Sony HX200V to give greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots much more aggressively.
Sony HX200V vs Sony WX50 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Sony HX200V
Portrait photography with Sony WX50
focusing manually
good resolution (18 megapixels)
provides face detect focusing
cannot use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
good MP (16 megapixels)
comes with face detection focus
lack of manual focus
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sony HX200V Street photography advice
Sony WX50 Street photography advice
screen tilts up and down
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
more heavy than competition (583g)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (117 grams)
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsSports Comparison
Sony HX200V Sports photography features
Sony WX50 Sports photography features
excellent zoom range (27-810mm 30.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (18 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
better than average battery pack (450 CIPA)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sony HX200V Travel photography info
Sony WX50 Travel photography info
better than average battery pack (450 per charge)
good resolution (18 megapixels)
built-in flash
fairly wide (27mm)
long reach (810mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition (583 grams)
does not contain selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
lighter than competition (117 grams)
good MP (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
quite wide (25mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.6)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Sony HX200V
Landscape photography with Sony WX50
focusing manually
fairly wide (27mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (18MP)
better than average battery pack (450 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
does not have Timelapse mode
quite wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16MP)
lack of manual focus
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.6)
small screen (2.7 inches)
manual mode not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Sony HX200V
Vlogging with Sony WX50
fairly wide (27mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not contain selfie friendly display
does not have microphone port
more heavy than competition (583g)
quite wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition (117 grams)
slow max aperture (f2.6)
display is not selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone jack
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Sony HX200V vs Sony WX50 Specifications
| Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Sony | Sony |
| Model type | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-05-11 | 2012-01-30 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | BIONZ | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 18 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4896 x 3672 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-810mm (30.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/2.6-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 922 thousand dot | 461 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD | Clearfoto TFT LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.40 m | 5.30 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 583g (1.29 lbs) | 117g (0.26 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") | 92 x 52 x 19mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 450 pictures | 240 pictures |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-FH50 | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $480 | $250 |
