Choosing Between Sony HX200V and WX50: A Practical Hands-On Comparison

When exploring the realm of compact and bridge cameras, Sony’s Cyber-shot lineup frequently pops up for review - and for good reason. Both the Sony HX200V and WX50 hail from the early 2010s, targeting different segments yet sharing some DNA. As someone who has tested hundreds of cameras across various genres over the years, I’m excited to dive deep into their nooks and crannies to help you figure out which one suits your style, skill level, and budget best. This isn’t just a spec sheet comparison - you’ll get real-world insights from extensive hands-on testing.

First Impressions: Size and Ergonomics Matter

Right off the bat, you’ll notice that the HX200V and WX50 serve very different form factor niches:

• Sony HX200V is a bridge camera shaped like an SLR, larger and heavier, with a robust button layout aiming for better handling.

• Sony WX50 is a pocket-sized compact, easy to slip in your jacket or purse, with a sleek, minimalistic design.

The HX200V weighs in at about 583g, and its dimensions (122x87x93 mm) imply a reassuringly chunky grip and body bulk. This makes it more stable to hold, especially when using its mammoth 30× optical zoom lens (27–810mm equivalent). For those like me who prefer a firm hold during extended shooting sessions, the HX200V feels right.

Contrast that with the WX50, a featherweight at just 117g and a svelte 92x52x19 mm chassis. This one’s tailored for on-the-go, casual shooters who prioritize portability. Ergonomics-wise, it’s less about a solid handhold and more about convenience. Small size, fewer physical controls - you get one hand operation but might find it a tad fiddly for precise manual adjustments.

If you’re someone who hates lugging around a bulky camera but wants something better than a smartphone, the WX50 might check your box. If you’re after something closer to a DSLR experience without switching lenses, HX200V’s heft is your friend.

Control Layout and User Interface: Comfort in Operation

Of course, how the camera feels also depends on how the controls are laid out. I tested prolonged use scenarios on both.

The HX200V sports a more comprehensive control scheme - dedicated rings for zoom and focus, mode dial with manual exposure options, and shortcut buttons. The top LCD displays key info, and you get a tilting 3” screen with 922k dots, great for varying shooting angles.

The WX50 is minimalistic here. It has no manual focus ring or aperture/shutter priority modes; those are locked out. Its 2.7” fixed LCD with 461k dots means screen resolution is noticeably lower, making it less vibrant and detailed for reviewing shots. What you gain is simplicity, but you lose quick access to advanced settings.

For anyone who enjoys finessing exposure settings or using manual modes for creative shots, the HX200V feels like home. Casual shooters or beginners craving a straightforward experience may appreciate the WX50’s simplicity.

Sensor and Image Quality: Same Size, Different Results

Both cameras share a 1/2.3" BSI CMOS sensor - the kind that fits compact cameras and bridge zoomers alike. But sensor resolution and processing nuances make a difference.

• Sony HX200V: 18MP sensor, max ISO 12,800, with BIONZ processing.

• Sony WX50: 16MP sensor, same max ISO, BIONZ as well.

While the higher megapixels on the HX200V suggest slightly more detail, the real headline is in how the chassis handles noise and dynamic range. I conducted side-by-side tests in controlled studio and outdoor lighting.

The HX200V tends to extract better detail in daylight and handles shadows more gracefully. Its advanced noise reduction algorithms keep grain controlled up to ISO 1600, after which noise becomes noticeable but still usable.

The WX50 performs surprisingly well, but noise creeps in earlier, and highlight roll-off is slightly harsher. The smaller optics and compact design limit light gathering ability, which translates into less flexible post-processing, especially for enthusiasts keen on editing RAW (which neither supports, by the way).

If image quality matters most, and you aim to make substantial prints or further tweak files, HX200V’s slight edge is worth noting.

Autofocus Systems: Tracking Versatility vs. Basic Simplicity

Autofocus performance can make or break shooting wildlife, sports, or even street photography. Let’s talk numbers:

• HX200V: 9 contrast-detection AF points with face detection and limited tracking.

• WX50: Unknown number of AF points; contrast-only AF with face detection.

I tested both on tracking moving subjects - a fast runner and fluttering birds at my local park. The HX200V’s AF struggled a bit without phase detection, but maintained focus lock reasonably well at longer telephoto focal lengths. Burst shooting up to 10fps paired with continuous AF delivery is decent for an ultra-zoom bridge camera.

The WX50 locks focus quicker in good light but tends to hesitate when subjects move erratically. Without continuous or predictive tracking, wildlife shots are trial-and-error and often missed.

For sports or wildlife where autofocus precision and speed matter, HX200V is the clear choice. For casual snaps or static shots, WX50’s AF system is sufficient.

Lens and Zoom Range: Versatility in Reach

They are both fixed-lens cameras, but their zoom scales vastly differ.

• HX200V: 27-810mm equivalent (30× zoom), aperture f/2.8-5.6

• WX50: 25-125mm equivalent (5× zoom), aperture f/2.6-6.3

That super-telephoto reach on the HX200V is extraordinary for a non-interchangeable system and adds major appeal for travel and wildlife shooters who want to get close without swapping lenses.

In my real-world shooting, this zoom versatility means landscape panoramas, distant wildlife shots, and detailed architectural close-ups are all possible without carrying a bag full of gear.

The WX50’s more modest zoom is perfect for everyday use and street shooting but leaves long-range options wanting. Also, the narrower aperture at telephoto on WX50 limits low-light usability.

If you love versatility and don’t mind a bigger camera, the HX200V’s zoom is a compelling feature.

Display and Viewfinder: Tilting Screen Vs. No Viewfinder

Screen usability impacts composition and framing, especially in tricky angles or bright light.

The HX200V shines here with its 3” XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD that tilts to allow low or high angle shooting. Its superior resolution (922k dots) makes image review crisp.

The WX50, on the other hand, comes with a fixed 2.7” Clearfoto TFT LCD at 461k dots. It’s not bad for casual use, but less flexible if you want more creative shooting angles.

Neither offers electronic viewfinders, which limits usability under direct sun. I personally miss a viewfinder on both when shooting outdoors extensively.

Battery Life and Storage: Balance Between Size and Stamina

Battery endurance plays a vital role when shooting all day, at events or travels.

• HX200V uses Sony NP-FH50 battery with approx. 450 shots per charge.

• WX50 uses Sony NP-BN battery rated for around 240 shots.

My field experience aligned with these claims: the HX200V’s larger battery and less energy-efficient processor deliver almost double the shots per charge compared to the WX50, which is understandable given its tiny form factor.

Both accept SD and Memory Stick Duo cards via a single slot - no dual-slot redundancy for backups, unfortunately.

Connectivity, GPS, and Extras: What’s Under the Hood?

The HX200V includes built-in GPS for geotagging images - a handy feature for travel photographers tracking locations without extra gadgets.

It supports Eye-Fi wireless SD card connectivity for remote image transfer.

The WX50 lacks wireless features or GPS, reflecting its entry-level positioning.

Both have HDMI output and USB 2.0 ports.

Neither offers microphone or headphone jacks, limiting their appeal for serious video content creators.

Video Recording Quality: Similar Capabilities, Limited Pro Features

Both cameras capture 1080p Full HD video at 60fps, with AVCHD and MPEG-4 formats supported.

In practice, video quality and stabilization were roughly similar, thanks to optical image stabilization (OIS) in both models.

The HX200V’s larger size means it’s steadier in hand, aiding smoother footage.

Neither offers advanced video functions like microphone input, headphone monitoring, or 4K recording.

For casual video blogging or family videos, both do the job, but don’t expect semi-pro quality or manual video controls.

Real-World Shooting Genres Breakdown: Who Shines Where?

What about their suitability across popular photography styles? I put these cameras through genre-specific testing (landscape, macro, sports, etc.) in various lighting.

Sony HX200V front Sony HX200V screen back Sony WX50 front Sony WX50 screen back

Portraits:

• HX200V’s 18MP sensor and face detection deliver pleasant skin tones and natural bokeh at wide aperture. Eye detection is absent, but its manual modes allow creative control.

• WX50 works adequately for casual portraits but with flatter bokeh and harsher noise in lower light.

Landscape:

• HX200V provides richer dynamic range and detail shooting RAW is impossible, but JPEG processing is capable.

• WX50’s smaller zoom range limits framing options. Color rendition is decent but less nuanced.

Wildlife:

• HX200V’s 30× zoom and continuous AF make it better for distant subjects, though AF struggles in low light.

• WX50’s 5× zoom makes wildlife shots difficult.

Sports:

• Neither are pro sports cams, but HX200V’s burst mode and AF tracking perform better for casual action.

Street:

• WX50’s compactness and discreet build are ideal for street photographers needing fast shots on the fly.

• HX200V is bulky and might intimidate street subjects.

Macro:

• HX200V offers macro focusing down to 1cm - exceptional for capturing intricate details.

• WX50 only manages 5cm macro, less versatile but still useful.

Night/Astro:

• Both cameras’ small sensors limit low-light astrophotography. HX200V’s higher ISO flexibility gives it a slight edge.

Travel:

• HX200V excels on versatility but is heavier, needing a decent travel bag.

• WX50’s compact size and ease of carry make it a great travel companion for casual shooting.

Professional Work:

• Neither supports RAW, limiting professional post-processing workflows.

• HX200V’s manual controls and GPS make it more suitable for fieldwork documentation.

Build Quality and Environmental Resistance

Neither camera boasts weather sealing or rugged features. Neither is dustproof, shockproof, or freezeproof.

Build-wise, HX200V’s plastic body feels more robust and substantial, while WX50’s slim, glossy finish beholds a bit more fragility.

For outdoor enthusiasts shooting in challenging conditions, I advise caution or added protective gear.

Image Stabilization Performance: Peace of Mind in Handheld Shots

Both models feature optical image stabilization (OIS), which is essential given their long zoom ranges and sensor size.

From my experience, the HX200V’s stabilization is more effective at telephoto zooms due to better lens design and stabilization mechanism. It allowed handheld shots at slower shutter speeds with acceptable sharpness.

The WX50 does fine at shorter focal lengths but struggled to maintain sharpness in low light or at full zoom.

Price-to-Performance: Gift or Gamble?

With current prices hovering around:

• HX200V: $480

• WX50: $250

Your budget heavily influences choice.

If you prioritize reach, manual control, and image versatility, HX200V offers considerably more bang for your buck.

If price and portability are paramount, and you primarily want a simple point-and-shoot for casual use, WX50 is a worthy contender.

Genre-Specific Scoring Summary

To visualize strengths and weaknesses:

Note how HX200V dominates zoom-dependent genres and manual exposure needs, while WX50 scores modestly but benefits street and travel shooters who prize discretion.

Final Thoughts: Which Should You Pick?

Sony HX200V is for you if:

• You want superzoom versatility (27-810mm)

• Prefer manual control modes: shutter/aperture priority, exposure compensation, ISO tweaking

• Seek better AF tracking and burst capabilities for action and wildlife

• Desire GPS tagging and superior battery life

• Are okay with a bulkier camera for more robust handling

Sony WX50 fits if:

• Ultra-portability and pocketable size are your main criteria

• Casual shooting with auto or scene modes is your style

• You want decent daylight image quality without advanced controls

• You prefer a budget-friendly entry-level compact camera

Some Personal Notes from My Testing Diary

I recall taking the HX200V on a multi-day road trip - its 30× zoom let me photograph birds and distant landscapes without changing gear. The GPS data embedded in files simplified organizing my shots later.

With the WX50, I appreciated slipping it into a jacket pocket at a bustling city market, capturing candid moments without drawing attention. Its quick start-up and minimal controls meant zero fuss, but I did miss a bit of creative leeway.

Wrapping Up: Practical Advice for Enthusiasts and Professionals

In this duo, there’s no one-size-fits-all winner. Instead, consider your shooting style:

• For enthusiasts leaning towards control, zoom, and diverse shooting situations, the Sony HX200V remains a surprisingly capable bridge camera even after all these years.

• For beginners or travelers wanting a pocket-sized, fuss-free companion, the WX50 does its job with quiet competence.

Remember to think carefully about ergonomics versus portability, zoom reach versus control accessibility, and your budget constraints.

I hope this hands-on breakdown, image demos, and scoring insights help you choose your next trusty Sony Cyber-shot partner confidently.

Happy shooting!