Sony HX400V vs Sony T900
62 Imaging
45 Features
60 Overall
51
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Sony HX400V vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 660g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
- Launched February 2014
- Succeeded the Sony HX300
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Revealed February 2009
Sony HX400V vs Sony T900 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Sony HX400V and Sony T900, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact and both of them are offered by Sony. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the HX400V (20MP) and T900 (12MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe HX400V was launched 5 years later than the T900 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Sony HX400V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight into a detailed comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the HX400V scores versus the T900 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sony HX400V vs Sony T900 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The complete galleries are available at Sony HX400V Gallery and Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony HX400V over the Sony T900
HX400V | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2014 | February 2009 | Fresher by 61 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Sony HX400V
T900 | HX400V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 921k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Sony HX400V and Sony T900
HX400V | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Sony HX400V vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera often, you need to consider its weight and size. The Sony HX400V offers physical dimensions of 130mm x 93mm x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") along with a weight of 660 grams (1.46 lbs) and the Sony T900 has specifications of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
See the Sony HX400V and Sony T900 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at the time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the HX400V vs the T900.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the HX400V and T900 is 62 and 96 respectively.
Sony HX400V vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizing merely by going through specs. The graphic below should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the HX400V and T900.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Sony HX400V to show extra detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The younger HX400V should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Sony HX400V vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sony HX400V vs Sony T900 Specifications
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Sony | Sony |
Model type | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2014-02-12 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Bionz X | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.3 | f/3.5-10.0 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3.5" |
Screen resolution | 921 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 2 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.50 m (ISO Auto) | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Flash Off / Autoflash / Fill-flash / Slow Sync. / Advanced Flash / Rear Sync. / Wireless (with optional compliant flash) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 660 grams (1.46 pounds) | 143 grams (0.32 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-BX1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $448 | $300 |