Sony HX90V vs Sony QX100
91 Imaging
43 Features
63 Overall
51


92 Imaging
50 Features
44 Overall
47
Sony HX90V vs Sony QX100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.4) lens
- 245g - 102 x 58 x 36mm
- Released April 2015
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 160 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 179g - 63 x 63 x 56mm
- Released September 2013

Compact Powerhouses Compared: Sony HX90V vs Sony QX100 – Which Suits Your Photography Style?
In the realm of compact cameras packed with features, Sony’s Cyber-shot lineup has consistently delivered intriguing options. Today, I’m diving into a detailed comparison between two distinctive yet popular models: the Sony HX90V, a traditional small sensor superzoom compact, and the Sony QX100, a lens-style camera designed to pair with your smartphone. Both were trailblazers in their launch years, and their different approaches offer interesting choices for enthusiasts and mobile photographers alike.
Having spent many hours shooting with both, running technical tests, and exploring their usability across photography genres, I’ll share my honest, hands-on insights. This comparison is designed to sift through raw specs, real-world performance, and practical value - so you can pick the one that fits your photographic ambitions.
Getting a Feel for Size and Handling: Ergonomics Matter
Handling a camera is where form meets function, and while specs tell part of the story, spending time with a camera uncovers those subtle comfort and control factors critical for any photographer.
The Sony HX90V sports a classic compact point-and-shoot shape, featuring a robust grip, thoughtfully placed buttons, and a pocketable - but not overly tiny - profile. Conversely, the Sony QX100 takes a unique route as a lens-style camera module intended to be attached or paired with your smartphone, lacking a body with typical camera controls.
As you can see here, the HX90V (right) feels substantial yet manageable, with physical dials and a tilting LCD that makes framing and reviewing shots a breeze. The QX100’s smaller, cylindrical form factor (left) means it's incredibly portable alone but requires your phone's screen and interface for control and viewing, making it less intuitive if you prefer tactile buttons or quick access controls.
From an ergonomic perspective, the HX90V edges out hands down in comfort, particularly for extended shooting sessions or those who favor direct manual exposure controls. The QX100 offers a fascinating "lens-only" experiment for smartphone users but demands familiarity with mobile apps and a willingness to operate without a dedicated viewfinder or body grip.
How They Look from Above: Control Layout and Design Philosophy
Controls and layout shape the shooting experience more than many realize, especially when shooting spontaneously or under pressure.
Here, the HX90V showcases a traditional top-plate with a mode dial, shutter release with zoom lever, and exposure compensation dial - controls that experienced photographers will appreciate for their ergonomics and responsiveness. The built-in pop-up viewfinder and flash complete a seasoned compact's package.
In comparison, the QX100 lacks traditional buttons or dials because it’s meant to be an accessory. Instead, you rely on your smartphone’s touchscreen to manipulate settings - which isn't necessarily a plus when shooting fast-paced scenes. There’s no physical shutter button on the lens module, which can feel alien and sometimes frustrating if you’re used to immediate tactile feedback.
In short: the HX90V brings a complete standalone experience. For those who want their camera controls at their fingertips, it's the clear winner.
Sensor Technology: The Heart of Image Quality
Sensor size and technology often dictate the upper limits of image quality. Let's jump into the fundamentals where these two cameras diverge most significantly.
The Sony HX90V features a 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS sensor measuring roughly 6.17 x 4.55 mm, delivering 18MP resolution. This small sensor size is common in superzoom compacts designed to cram extensive zoom ranges (in this case, a whopping 30x optical zoom from 24 to 720mm equivalent) into a pocket-sized body.
In contrast, the Sony QX100 boasts the larger 1-inch BSI-CMOS sensor (13.2 x 8.8 mm, 20MP), the same sensor found in the much-revered RX100 series. Sensor size difference isn’t trivial - it means the QX100 can capture significantly better image quality, especially in low light and dynamic range, with more control over depth of field.
From my testing, the QX100's sensor excels in producing less noise at higher ISOs and delivers richer detail retention - especially apparent in landscape and portrait shots. The HX90V’s sensor, while commendable for its class, cannot match this level of quality, which is typical of smaller formats.
If sensor performance is your priority, especially image clarity and low-light prowess, the QX100 holds a significant advantage.
Screen and Interface: How You See Your Images Matters
With cameras increasingly reliant on LCDs for framing and review, screen quality and design impact usability heavily.
The HX90V features a bright and responsive 3-inch tilting LCD screen with 921k-dot resolution, granting flexibility to frame creative angles without awkward body positioning. This is vital for macro, street photography, or when hunting for that elusive overhead or low shot.
The QX100, on the other hand, lacks an integrated screen entirely. Instead, it connects wirelessly to your smartphone (via Wi-Fi and NFC), using your phone’s screen as a live-viewfinder and control interface. While this offers the advantage of ultra-slim size and integrating smart connectivity, it also introduces latency and depends on smartphone battery and app stability.
I found the HX90V’s dedicated screen to be a far more reliable and spontaneous way to shoot. The QX100’s reliance on a phone’s screen can be a double-edged sword - it’s convenient if you’re already attached to your phone but cumbersome if you want quick access or professional-grade responsiveness.
Versatility Through Lenses and Zoom Ranges
Lens capability heavily influences what you can photograph without lugging extra gear.
The Sony HX90V sports a fixed 24-720mm (30x optical zoom) lens - arguably one of the longest zoom ranges found in a compact camera - covering everything from wide-angle landscapes to distant wildlife and sports action. The aperture range is F3.5-6.4, which is fairly typical for such zooms but controls depth of field less effectively at telephoto lengths.
The Sony QX100 offers a shorter 28-100mm (3.6x zoom) lens but compensates with a much faster maximum aperture of F1.8 to F4.9, which promises better low-light performance and creamier bokeh, essential for portraits and artistic close-ups.
This combination defines usage scenarios clearly:
- HX90V: Ideal for travel, wildlife, and sports where zoom reach and versatility trump shallow depth of field.
- QX100: Suited for portraits, street photography, and low-light ventures where image quality and light gathering are paramount.
Autofocus Systems: Speed, Accuracy, and Tracking
Speed and accuracy in autofocus (AF) systems make or break sports and wildlife shots and smooth video capture.
The HX90V employs contrast-detection autofocus with face detection, multi-area AF, and 10 fps continuous shooting, making it surprisingly nimble for a compact superzoom. It supports AF tracking which holds focus on moving subjects fairly reliably, although slower than pricier mirrorless systems.
The QX100 uses contrast-detection AF with face detection but lacks continuous AF, AF tracking, and burst shooting capabilities. Its AF speed is adequate for static and posed subjects but slower and less responsive for action photography or wildlife tracking.
Given my tests shooting moving subjects and outdoor sports scenarios, the HX90V’s autofocus system wins hands-down for speed and versatility.
Battery Life and Storage: Day-to-Day Reliability
Photographers need dependability, and battery longevity and storage capacity often get overlooked until shooting tours or extended sessions.
The HX90V packs a decent 360-shot battery life per charge (using the NP-BX1 battery), outpacing the QX100’s roughly 200 shots per charge on the NP-BN battery. The difference is notable when you’re shooting through a day-long festival or travel outing.
Both cameras use standard SD memory formats, but the QX100 interestingly supports microSD cards due to its lens-style form factor, while the HX90V accepts full-sized SD/SDHC/SDXC cards, a consideration for those who prefer standard-sized cards.
Verdict: The HX90V is more reliable for longer shooting sessions, while the QX100 may require extra batteries or power management strategies.
Build Quality and Weather Resistance: Toughness for Real-World Use
Neither camera offers environmental sealing or rugged protection, so they must be handled with care in hostile conditions.
The HX90V’s compact body feels sturdy and well constructed, featuring a metal lens barrel and a solid chassis, useful when shooting in windy or dusty environments. However, it’s not weather-sealed.
The QX100, being a lens-only device, is delicate and more susceptible to damage from drops or moisture.
If ruggedness is a priority, the HX90V is the safer bet.
Examining Image Samples: Real-World Quality Side by Side
To give a sense of their relative strengths and weaknesses, here are sample shots taken from both cameras under varying conditions:
The QX100’s larger sensor produces more nuanced color gradations, better detail in shadow and highlight areas, and smoother background blur. Skin tones are more natural, benefiting portrait shooters.
The HX90V excels at capturing sharply focused subjects at great distances thanks to the 30x zoom, delivering unexpected detail for a compact. Yet, small sensor noise appears under higher ISOs, and the bokeh is less creamy.
Performance Ratings and Overall Scores
We compiled weighted scores based on our rigorous tests accounting for image quality, autofocus, ergonomics, and features.
- Sony HX90V: Strong performer in zoom reach, usability, and autofocus. Ideal for versatile travel and everyday shooting.
- Sony QX100: Superior sensor quality and image output but limited by control methodology and zoom range.
Specialty Shooting Disciplines: Which Camera Shines Where?
Breaking it down by photography genre:
- Portraits: QX100 wins due to larger sensor and faster lens for skin tones and bokeh.
- Landscape: QX100’s superior dynamic range and resolution offer an advantage, but HX90V’s zoom supports creative framing.
- Wildlife: HX90V’s longer zoom and burst mode provide better chances of capturing action.
- Sports: HX90V’s fast continuous shooting and AF tracking dominate.
- Street: QX100 is more discreet paired with a phone but demands workflow adaptation.
- Macro: Both can focus closely (5cm min focus), but QX100’s image quality edges ahead.
- Night / Astro: Larger QX100 sensor excels at high ISO and low noise.
- Video: HX90V supports 1080p at 60fps with steady optical stabilization; QX100 is limited to 1080p/30fps.
- Travel: HX90V offers more one-camera versatility.
- Professional Use: Neither is a pro tool, but QX100 provides superior image quality raw potential (though lacks RAW capture).
Practical Recommendations: Who Should Choose Which?
Go for the Sony HX90V if you:
- Want an all-in-one compact with long zoom reach and solid autofocus
- Prefer a traditional camera experience with physical controls and a viewfinder
- Need better battery life for extended shooting
- Plan to shoot fast action: sports, wildlife, travel snapshots
- Value portability but want a standalone ready-to-go camera
Pick the Sony QX100 if you:
- Prioritize image quality with a larger 1" sensor and faster lens
- Are comfortable using your smartphone as the control hub
- Focus on portraits, street photography, and low-light shooting
- Want a compact lens module to complement a phone camera system
- Don’t mind the lack of physical controls or viewfinder
Final Thoughts: Different Tools for Different Goals
Both the Sony HX90V and QX100 carve out important niches. My extensive hands-on and technical evaluations reveal their contrasting priorities: HX90V emphasizes versatility and traditional compact convenience, while QX100 pushes image quality boundaries within a minimalistic, smartphone-integrated form.
For photographers after a simple, zoom-capable, built-in display camera that can keep pace across genres, the HX90V remains a strong contender years after release. Meanwhile, those who want higher-quality images without lugging a full camera, and who embrace smartphone workflows, may find the QX100’s novel concept rewarding - once they adapt to its unique operation style.
With these informed insights, I hope your choice is clearer - whether you seek a versatile, tactile zoom juggernaut, or a streamlined, sensor-rich companion for your mobile photography arsenal.
Note: Pricing and availability may vary, so consider your budget alongside these comprehensive criteria.
Thank you for reading this thorough comparison. Feel free to reach out with any questions or if you want deeper dives into specific shooting tests!
Happy shooting!
Sony HX90V vs Sony QX100 Specifications
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Sony | Sony |
Model type | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Lens-style |
Released | 2015-04-14 | 2013-09-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Lens-style |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Bionz X | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4896 x 3672 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 160 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 28-100mm (3.6x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-6.4 | f/1.8-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | - |
Screen resolution | 921k dots | 0k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | Depends on connected smartphone |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 638k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.5x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.40 m (with Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, flash on, slow sync, flash off, rear sync | None |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | AVCHD, XAVC S | MPEG-4 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 245g (0.54 pounds) | 179g (0.39 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 58 x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") | 63 x 63 x 56mm (2.5" x 2.5" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photographs | 200 photographs |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-BX1 | NP-BN, |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $440 | $268 |