Sony QX10 vs Sony S2000
96 Imaging
43 Features
34 Overall
39
93 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Sony QX10 vs Sony S2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1440 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 105g - 62 x 62 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Launched January 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Sony QX10 vs Sony S2000 Overview
Below is a extended assessment of the Sony QX10 versus Sony S2000, former being a Lens-style while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are designed by Sony. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the QX10 (18MP) and S2000 (10MP) but they use the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe QX10 was revealed 3 years later than the S2000 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Sony QX10 being a Lens-style camera and the Sony S2000 being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the QX10 matches up vs the S2000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Sony QX10 vs Sony S2000 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000. The full galleries are viewable at Sony QX10 Gallery & Sony S2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony QX10 over the Sony S2000
| QX10 | S2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2013 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 45 months |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony S2000 over the Sony QX10
| S2000 | QX10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | " | Larger display (+3") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 0k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Sony QX10 and Sony S2000
| QX10 | S2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Sony QX10 vs Sony S2000 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Sony QX10 has got physical measurements of 62mm x 62mm x 33mm (2.4" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs) while the Sony S2000 has sizing of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Sony QX10 versus Sony S2000 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the QX10 against the S2000.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the QX10 and S2000 is 96 and 93 respectively.
Sony QX10 vs Sony S2000 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reading through specs. The visual below should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the QX10 and S2000.
All in all, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Sony QX10 to give you extra detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos far more aggressively. The more modern QX10 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Sony QX10 vs Sony S2000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Sony QX10 vs Sony S2000 Specifications
| Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Sony | Sony |
| Model type | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 |
| Category | Lens-style | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2013-09-04 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Lens-style | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 18 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4896 x 3672 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | 33-105mm (3.2x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | - | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 0k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | Depends on connected smartphone | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/1200 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.30 m |
| Flash modes | None | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1440 x 1080 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1440x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 105 grams (0.23 pounds) | 167 grams (0.37 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 62 x 62 x 33mm (2.4" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-BN, | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $250 | $225 |
