Clicky

Sony QX100 vs Sony W220

Portability
92
Imaging
51
Features
44
Overall
48
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 front
Portability
95
Imaging
34
Features
17
Overall
27

Sony QX100 vs Sony W220 Key Specs

Sony QX100
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • " Fixed Screen
  • ISO 160 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
  • 179g - 63 x 63 x 56mm
  • Introduced September 2013
Sony W220
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 30-120mm (F2.8-7.1) lens
  • 147g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
  • Announced January 2009
Photography Glossary

Sony QX100 vs Sony W220 Overview

Let's look more closely at the Sony QX100 vs Sony W220, one is a Lens-style and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are created by Sony. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the QX100 (20MP) and W220 (12MP) and the QX100 (1") and W220 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizing.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The QX100 was introduced 4 years after the W220 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Sony QX100 being a Lens-style camera and the Sony W220 being a Compact camera.

Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the QX100 scores against the W220 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Sony QX100 over the Sony W220

 QX100 W220 
AnnouncedSeptember 2013January 2009Newer by 57 months
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sony W220 over the Sony QX100

 W220 QX100 
Display dimensions2.7""Larger display (+2.7")
Display resolution230k0kSharper display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Sony QX100 and Sony W220

 QX100 W220 
Manually focus Very precise focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Sony QX100 vs Sony W220 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera, you should factor its weight and volume. The Sony QX100 offers external dimensions of 63mm x 63mm x 56mm (2.5" x 2.5" x 2.2") along with a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Sony W220 has sizing of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs).

Examine the Sony QX100 vs Sony W220 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the QX100 vs the W220.

Sony QX100 vs Sony W220 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the QX100 and W220 is 92 and 95 respectively.

Sony QX100 vs Sony W220 top view buttons comparison

Sony QX100 vs Sony W220 Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be hard to picture the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic below may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the QX100 and W220.

Clearly, each of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The QX100 using its larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Sony QX100 will deliver greater detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The younger QX100 should have an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Sony QX100 vs Sony W220 sensor size comparison

Sony QX100 vs Sony W220 Screen and ViewFinder

Sony QX100 vs Sony W220 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Sony QX100
Portrait photography with Sony W220
53
you can focus manually
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (1")
includes face detect focusing
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
lack of RAW support
27
has manual focus
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Sony QX100 Street photography features
Sony W220 Street photography features
71
image stabilization (Optical)
nice sensor size (1")
includes focus by touch
screen does not articulate
lack of RAW support
56
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sony QX100 Sports photography details
Sony W220 Sports photography details
55
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (1")
not so great battery power (200 shots)
lack of phase detect AF
25
built in image stabilization (Optical)
slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Sony QX100 Travel photography factors
Sony W220 Travel photography factors
69
includes focus by touch
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
pretty wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
does not have Time Lapse mode
not so great battery power (200 CIPA)
screen is not selfie friendly
51
built-in flash
missing Timelapse recording
megapixel count low (12MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
wide angle not the best (30mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Sony QX100 Landscape photography advice
Sony W220 Landscape photography advice
54
you can focus manually
pretty wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (1")
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
small screen ( inch)
manual exposure not possible
lack of RAW support
not so great battery power (200 shots)
does not have Time Lapse mode
32
has manual focus
built in image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (30mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
manual mode not possible
megapixel count low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
missing Timelapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Sony QX100 as a Vlogging camera
Sony W220 as a Vlogging camera
38
pretty wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
touchscreen functionality
image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have mic socket
25
built in image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not the best (30mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
missing external microphone port
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sony QX100 vs Sony W220 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sony QX100 and Sony W220
 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220
General Information
Make Sony Sony
Model type Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220
Class Lens-style Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2013-09-05 2009-01-08
Body design Lens-style Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 13.2 x 8.8mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 116.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 5472 x 3648 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 6400 3200
Lowest native ISO 160 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points - 9
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-100mm (3.6x) 30-120mm (4.0x)
Maximal aperture f/1.8-4.9 f/2.8-7.1
Macro focusing range 5cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 2.7 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal - 2.7 inch
Resolution of screen 0k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech Depends on connected smartphone -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 1s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1600s
Continuous shooting speed - 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 7.10 m (Auto ISO)
Flash settings None Auto, Flash On, Slow Syncro, Red-eye, Flash Off
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (8 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video format MPEG-4 Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 179g (0.39 lbs) 147g (0.32 lbs)
Physical dimensions 63 x 63 x 56mm (2.5" x 2.5" x 2.2") 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 200 photos -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID NP-BN, -
Self timer Yes (2, 10 secs) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $268 $160