Sony QX30 vs Sony TX200V
91 Imaging
45 Features
37 Overall
41
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Sony QX30 vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.3) lens
- 193g - 68 x 65 x 58mm
- Released September 2014
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Released January 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Sony QX30 vs Sony TX200V Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Sony QX30 versus Sony TX200V, former being a Lens-style while the other is a Ultracompact and both are created by Sony. The sensor resolution of the QX30 (20MP) and the TX200V (18MP) is very comparable and they possess the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe QX30 was brought out 2 years later than the TX200V and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Sony QX30 being a Lens-style camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting through a in depth comparison, below is a short introduction of how the QX30 matches up against the TX200V with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Sony QX30 vs Sony TX200V Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The entire galleries are provided at Sony QX30 Gallery & Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony QX30 over the Sony TX200V
| QX30 | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2014 |  | January 2012 | More recent by 32 months |
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Sony QX30
| TX200V | QX30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3.3" |  | " | Larger display (+3.3") |
| Display resolution | 1230k |  | 0k | Sharper display (+1230k dot) |
Common features in the Sony QX30 and Sony TX200V
| QX30 | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Sony QX30 vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Sony QX30 has got external measurements of 68mm x 65mm x 58mm (2.7" x 2.6" x 2.3") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Sony TX200V has specifications of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Look at the Sony QX30 versus Sony TX200V in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the QX30 compared to the TX200V.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the QX30 and TX200V is 91 and 96 respectively.
Sony QX30 vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to see the contrast in sensor measurements only by going through specs. The visual underneath will offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the QX30 and TX200V.
All in all, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Sony QX30 to provide greater detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images a little more aggressively. The newer QX30 will have an advantage in sensor technology.
Sony QX30 vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Sony QX30 vs Sony TX200V Specifications
| Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Sony | Sony |
| Model | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX30 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
| Class | Lens-style | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2014-09-03 | 2012-01-30 |
| Body design | Lens-style | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Bionz X | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-6.3 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | - | 3.3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 0 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 2 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.10 m |
| Flash modes | None | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 193g (0.43 pounds) | 129g (0.28 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 68 x 65 x 58mm (2.7" x 2.6" x 2.3") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 photographs | 220 photographs |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-BN, | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $348 | $500 |
