Sony RX1 vs Sony W320
79 Imaging
69 Features
57 Overall
64
97 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Sony RX1 vs Sony W320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0-22.0) lens
- 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
- Revealed February 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
- Announced January 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Sony RX1 vs Sony W320 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Sony RX1 vs Sony W320, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact and both of them are manufactured by Sony. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the RX1 (24MP) and W320 (14MP) and the RX1 (Full frame) and W320 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe RX1 was revealed 3 years later than the W320 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Sony RX1 being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony W320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving in to a complete comparison, below is a short highlight of how the RX1 scores vs the W320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Sony RX1 vs Sony W320 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320. The full galleries are available at Sony RX1 Gallery & Sony W320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony RX1 over the Sony W320
| RX1 | W320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2013 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 38 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1229k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+999k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Sony RX1
| W320 | RX1 |
|---|
Common features in the Sony RX1 and Sony W320
| RX1 | W320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Sony RX1 vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The Sony RX1 offers exterior dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") having a weight of 482 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Sony W320 has proportions of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") and a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Take a look at the Sony RX1 vs Sony W320 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the RX1 compared to the W320.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the RX1 and W320 is 79 and 97 respectively.
Sony RX1 vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to picture the gap in sensor measurements just by viewing technical specs. The photograph below will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the RX1 and W320.
As you have seen, both cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The RX1 with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Sony RX1 will provide you with greater detail because of its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more modern RX1 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Sony RX1 vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Sony RX1 vs Sony W320 Specifications
| Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Sony | Sony |
| Model type | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 |
| Type | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2013-02-19 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Full frame | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 35.8 x 23.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 852.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35mm (1x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-22.0 | f/2.7-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 4cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 1,229k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | Xtra FineTFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic and Optical (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 1 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m | 4.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/4000 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 482 grams (1.06 pounds) | 117 grams (0.26 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") | 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 93 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 25.1 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 2534 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 270 photos | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-BX1 | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $2,798 | $269 |