Sony RX10 III vs Sony TX200V
53 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Sony RX10 III vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
- Introduced March 2016
- Old Model is Sony RX10 II
- Replacement is Sony RX10 IV
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Introduced January 2012
Sony RX10 III vs Sony TX200V Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Sony RX10 III versus Sony TX200V, one being a Large Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact and both of them are offered by Sony. The sensor resolution of the RX10 III (20MP) and the TX200V (18MP) is relatively similar but the RX10 III (1") and TX200V (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe RX10 III was manufactured 4 years later than the TX200V and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Sony RX10 III being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief view of how the RX10 III matches up against the TX200V in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sony RX10 III vs Sony TX200V Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The entire galleries are provided at Sony RX10 III Gallery and Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Sony TX200V
RX10 III | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | March 2016 | January 2012 | Fresher by 51 months | |
Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Sony RX10 III
TX200V | RX10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3.3" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 1229k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Sony RX10 III and Sony TX200V
RX10 III | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Sony RX10 III vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and proportions. The Sony RX10 III offers outer measurements of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") having a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs) and the Sony TX200V has measurements of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check out the Sony RX10 III versus Sony TX200V in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the RX10 III and the TX200V.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the RX10 III and TX200V is 53 and 96 respectively.
Sony RX10 III vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizing purely by reviewing specifications. The graphic below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the RX10 III and TX200V.
Plainly, each of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The RX10 III because of its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Sony RX10 III will deliver greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more recent RX10 III is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Sony RX10 III vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sony RX10 III vs Sony TX200V Specifications
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Sony | Sony |
Model | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
Category | Large Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2016-03-29 | 2012-01-30 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Bionz X | BIONZ |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 116.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 18MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-600mm (25.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.4-4.0 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 2.7 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3.3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,229 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,359 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.7x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 2 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 14.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.10 m |
Flash options | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 1051g (2.32 lb) | 129g (0.28 lb) |
Dimensions | 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 70 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.6 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 472 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 photos | 220 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-FW50 | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $1,398 | $500 |