Sony RX1R vs Sony W320
79 Imaging
70 Features
58 Overall
65
97 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Sony RX1R vs Sony W320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
- Introduced June 2013
- Successor is Sony RX1R II
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
- Announced January 2010
Sony RX1R vs Sony W320 Overview
Below, we are looking at the Sony RX1R vs Sony W320, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact and they are both manufactured by Sony. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the RX1R (24MP) and W320 (14MP) and the RX1R (Full frame) and W320 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe RX1R was launched 3 years after the W320 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Sony RX1R being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony W320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a short summary of how the RX1R scores vs the W320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sony RX1R vs Sony W320 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320. The complete galleries are provided at Sony RX1R Gallery & Sony W320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony RX1R over the Sony W320
RX1R | W320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | June 2013 | January 2010 | Newer by 43 months | |
Focus manually | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1229k | 230k | Crisper display (+999k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Sony RX1R
W320 | RX1R |
---|
Common features in the Sony RX1R and Sony W320
RX1R | W320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Sony RX1R vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Sony RX1R enjoys external dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 482 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Sony W320 has specifications of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") along with a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Take a look at the Sony RX1R vs Sony W320 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the RX1R versus the W320.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the RX1R and W320 is 79 and 97 respectively.
Sony RX1R vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by seeing a spec sheet. The picture underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the RX1R and W320.
Clearly, the two cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The RX1R due to its larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Sony RX1R will provide greater detail utilizing its extra 10MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The more modern RX1R is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Sony RX1R vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sony RX1R vs Sony W320 Specifications
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Sony | Sony |
Model | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2013-06-26 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Full frame | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 35.8 x 23.9mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 855.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35mm (1x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.7-5.7 |
Macro focus range | - | 4cm |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,229k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | Xtra FineTFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic and Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 1 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 6.00 m | 4.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Sync, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/4000 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 482g (1.06 pounds) | 117g (0.26 pounds) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") | 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 91 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 25.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 13.6 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 2537 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 270 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-BX1 | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $2,798 | $269 |