Clicky

Sony S2000 vs Sony W220

Portability
93
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 front
Portability
95
Imaging
34
Features
17
Overall
27

Sony S2000 vs Sony W220 Key Specs

Sony S2000
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
  • Introduced January 2010
Sony W220
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 30-120mm (F2.8-7.1) lens
  • 147g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
  • Released January 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sony S2000 vs Sony W220 Overview

Following is a detailed review of the Sony S2000 versus Sony W220, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras and both of them are produced by Sony. The resolution of the S2000 (10MP) and the W220 (12MP) is relatively similar and both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The S2000 was brought out 13 months after the W220 which makes them a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the S2000 scores vs the W220 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Sony S2000 over the Sony W220

 S2000 W220 
ReleasedJanuary 2010January 2009More modern by 13 months
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")

Reasons to pick Sony W220 over the Sony S2000

 W220 S2000 
Focus manually More accurate focusing

Common features in the Sony S2000 and Sony W220

 S2000 W220 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kExact same screen resolution
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lacking Touch friendly screen

Sony S2000 vs Sony W220 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and size. The Sony S2000 has outside measurements of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Sony W220 has specifications of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs).

Compare the Sony S2000 versus Sony W220 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select at the time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the S2000 vs the W220.

Sony S2000 vs Sony W220 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the S2000 and W220 is 93 and 95 respectively.

Sony S2000 vs Sony W220 top view buttons comparison

Sony S2000 vs Sony W220 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizes only by reading specs. The picture below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the S2000 and W220.

All in all, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You should count on the Sony W220 to offer greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs way more aggressively. The more recent S2000 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Sony S2000 vs Sony W220 sensor size comparison

Sony S2000 vs Sony W220 Screen and ViewFinder

Sony S2000 vs Sony W220 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Sony S2000 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony W220 as a Portrait photography camera
19
no manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
27
manual focus
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Sony S2000 Street photography highlights
Sony W220 Street photography highlights
46
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
56
image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Sony S2000 Sports photography advice
Sony W220 Sports photography advice
16
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,200 seconds)
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
25
image stabilization (Optical)
low frames per second (2.0 fps)
no shutter priority
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Sony S2000 Travel photography info
Sony W220 Travel photography info
50
built-in flash
missing Timelapse function
MP count low (10MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (33mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
51
built-in flash
doesn't have Timelapse function
MP count low (12 megapixels)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
wide angle not fantastic (30mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Sony S2000
Landscape photography with Sony W220
27
screen size is decent (3 inch)
no manual focus
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (33mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
no manual control
no image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
missing Timelapse function
32
manual focus
image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (30mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.7")
manual exposure not possible
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Sony S2000 Vlogging information
Sony W220 Vlogging information
21
wide angle not the best (33mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 resolution)
missing microphone port
25
image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not fantastic (30mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
low quality video (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sony S2000 vs Sony W220 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sony S2000 and Sony W220
 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220
General Information
Brand Name Sony Sony
Model type Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2010-01-07 2009-01-08
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip Bionz -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3456 x 2592 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 33-105mm (3.2x) 30-120mm (4.0x)
Max aperture f/3.1-5.6 f/2.8-7.1
Macro focusing distance 5cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 1 secs 1 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/1200 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shooting rate 1.0 frames/s 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.30 m 7.10 m (Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro Auto, Flash On, Slow Syncro, Red-eye, Flash Off
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (8 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 167 gr (0.37 pounds) 147 gr (0.32 pounds)
Physical dimensions 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID 2 x AA -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $225 $160