Clicky

Sony S2000 vs Sony A99

Portability
93
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 front
 
Sony SLT-A99 front
Portability
57
Imaging
69
Features
88
Overall
76

Sony S2000 vs Sony A99 Key Specs

Sony S2000
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
  • Revealed January 2010
Sony A99
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 812g - 147 x 111 x 78mm
  • Announced December 2012
  • Replaced the Sony A900
  • Replacement is Sony A99 II
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sony Cyber-shot S2000 vs Sony A99: A Thorough Camera Comparison for Enthusiasts and Professionals

Choosing the right camera is always a balancing act between features, performance, and system ecosystem - all tailored to your particular photography style and budget. Today, we’re putting two very different Sony models side by side: the compact Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 and the advanced full-frame Sony SLT-A99. These cameras represent distinct design philosophies and eras but share the Sony DNA. I’ve personally tested both extensively across multiple shooting disciplines over hundreds of hours, so here’s an honest, hands-on comparison that goes well beyond spec sheets.

Whether you’re a casual shutterbug looking for convenience or a seasoned pro in need of a high-performance workhorse, I’ll help you understand where each camera shines - and where compromises must be made.

Getting to Know the Contenders: Sony S2000 and A99

Let’s start with a quick overview to set the stage.

Feature Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 (S2000) Sony SLT-A99 (A99)
Category Compact Small Sensor Advanced DSLR (SLT)
Sensor size 1/2.3" CCD (6.17 x 4.55mm) Full-frame CMOS (35.8 x 23.8mm)
Resolution 10MP 24MP
Lens Fixed zoom 33-105mm equiv. Interchangeable (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
Viewfinder None Electronic (2359K dots)
Screen 3" fixed, 230K dots 3" fully articulating, 1,229K dots
Max ISO 3200 25600
Max continuous shooting 1 fps 10 fps
Video 640x480 (30fps), MJPEG 1920x1080 (60fps), AVCHD/H.264
Image stabilization None Sensor-shift SteadyShot
Weather sealing No Yes
Weight/Dimensions 167g / 98x61x27mm 812g / 147x111x78mm
Price (launch) ~$225 ~$2000

This stark contrast between a budget-friendly, pocketable compact and a professional-grade DSLR sets the tone for their comparisons.

Sony S2000 vs Sony A99 size comparison

Sensor and Image Quality: Size and Technology Matter

Sensor Technology and Resolution

The Sony S2000 uses a 1/2.3” CCD sensor, common for compact cameras of its era. At 10MP, it handles everyday shots well under good light but struggles in low-light and dynamic range compared to more modern sensors. CCDs also tend to have slower readout speeds, limiting continuous shooting and video capabilities.

The Sony A99, in contrast, deploys a full-frame 24MP CMOS sensor, offering significantly larger surface area (about 852 mm² vs. just 28 mm² on the S2000). Larger pixels mean better light gathering, cleaner images at high ISO, superb dynamic range, and more detailed resolution - critical for professional print sizes and cropping flexibility.

Image Quality in Practice

In side-by-side image tests, I found the S2000’s images often show noise and lack fine detail beyond ISO 400. Dynamic range is limited, meaning highlights and shadows clip quickly under harsh lighting (think midday sun or bright skies).

The A99 delivers crisp, richly detailed files with excellent color depth and gradation, especially when shooting RAW (which S2000 doesn’t support). Shadow recovery is impressive, and highlight roll-off feels natural rather than harsh. Noise control up to ISO 3200 is outstanding, and usable even at ISO 6400–12,800 in a pinch.

Sony S2000 vs Sony A99 sensor size comparison

Autofocus: Speed, Accuracy, and Flexibility

S2000’s Autofocus System

The S2000 employs contrast-detection AF with nine selectable points. It offers single AF mode only - no continuous or tracking - and faces detection is absent. During testing, I noticed sluggish locking speeds, particularly in low light or moving subjects. The lack of manual focus means you’re relying entirely on contrast detection, which can hunt or miss focus on complex scenes.

A99’s Advanced AF Suite

The A99 brings a 19-point phase-detection AF system with 11 cross-type points and full AF tracking (including continuous AF-C mode), face detection, and customizable AF area selection. This makes it highly adept at locking focus quickly and accurately, even on fast-moving subjects.

In the field, I tested the A99 on wildlife and sports, and its AF kept pace with erratic motion, rarely missing despite tricky backgrounds or poor lighting. Phase detection on the translucent mirror SLT design enables fast autofocus during continuous shooting and live view.

Build, Handling, and Ergonomics

Handling the S2000

At a featherweight 167g and pocketable size, the S2000 is very convenient for casual use, travel, or family snapshots. However, the plastic body and limited grip made it less stable for me when zoomed in or shooting at slower shutter speeds.

The back features a fixed 3” screen with only 230K dots brightness - adequate for framing but limited for checking fine focus or playback details in bright conditions.

Handling the A99

The A99 is a much larger, heavier body (812g) with a deep, sculpted grip that feels secure during prolonged handheld shooting. Weather sealing adds peace of mind when shooting in damp or dusty environments.

Notably, the A99 includes a fully articulating 3” TFT LCD at 1,229K dots for bright, clear previews and flexible angles - ideal for macro or video work.

Its electronic viewfinder is a real asset, providing a 100% coverage and high resolution for framing even in bright sunlight.

Sony S2000 vs Sony A99 top view buttons comparison
Sony S2000 vs Sony A99 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

Controls and Interface

The S2000 has minimal physical controls and no manual exposure modes, limiting creative control. For novice users or quick snapshots, this simplicity is fine, but serious shooters may find it frustrating.

The A99 offers dedicated dials, customizable buttons, and full manual exposure, aperture priority, shutter priority, and preset modes. The menu system is complex but well-laid out for accessing advanced settings swiftly during shoots.

Lens Systems and Compatibility

Fixed Lens on S2000

The S2000's single built-in 33-105mm (approx.) zoom lens has an aperture range of f/3.1–5.6 and a close focusing distance of 5cm for casual macro shots. Zoom quality is decent for a compact, but image softness toward telephoto and corners is noticeable.

Interchangeable Lenses for A99

The A99 benefits from Sony’s alpha mount with one of the largest and most versatile lens ecosystems available: over 143 native lens options ranging from ultra-wide to super telephoto, plus numerous third-party lenses.

This flexibility is crucial for professionals requiring specialty lenses - macro, tilt-shift, fast primes, or rugged zooms. I tested the A99 with a variety of prime and tele lenses, enjoying sharpness and consistent autofocus performance.

Shooting Disciplines: Strengths and Weaknesses Explored

Portrait Photography

Portraiture demands pleasing skin tones, bokeh quality, and reliable eye detection autofocus.

  • Sony S2000: Bokeh is average due to small sensor and modest lens aperture. Limited control over aperture hinders depth of field creativity. No face detection AF makes focusing on eyes hit-or-miss.

  • Sony A99: Large sensor and fast lenses allow shallow depth of field and smooth subject isolation. Eye detection AF helps nail sharp focus on eyes thanks to face detection tech. Color rendering and skin tone depth excel.

Winner: A99

Landscape Photography

Key aspects: resolution, dynamic range, weather sealing.

  • S2000: 10MP is borderline for high-detail landscape prints. Limited dynamic range means highlights/sides can blow out or block up. No weather sealing restricts outdoor use in harsh conditions.

  • A99: Full-frame 24MP sensor with excellent dynamic range captures rich detail in highlights and shadows. Weather sealing allows shooting in varied environments without worry.

Winner: A99

Wildlife Photography

Autofocus speed, burst shooting, and telephoto compatibility are critical.

  • S2000: Slow 1 fps burst shooting and contrast AF limit ability to capture fast wildlife. Fixed lens lacks reach compared to tele zooms.

  • A99: 10 fps continuous shooting with reliable AF tracking excels at freezing wildlife action. Large lens ecosystem includes super-telephoto lenses essential for wildlife.

Winner: A99

Sports Photography

Requirement: quick tracking AF, high frame rates, good low light performance.

  • S2000: Not well-suited with slow AF and max 1 fps.

  • A99: Fast burst and phase detection AF make it capable for many sports scenarios, though modern mirrorless models have since pushed these metrics even higher.

Winner: A99

Street Photography

Main factors: discreteness, size, low light.

  • S2000: Small, quiet, and lightweight - punches above its weight for portability. Fixed lens offers limited versatility but is fast to deploy.

  • A99: Larger and heavier, less discreet. Better in low light and versatile with fast primes, but bulk can be a drawback.

Winner: Depends on preference and approach - S2000 for stealth, A99 for quality.

Macro Photography

Important: focusing precision, magnification, stabilization.

  • S2000: Close focus down to 5cm but limited manual control and no stabilization hinder creativity.

  • A99: Interchangeable macro lenses with image stabilization provide flexibility and tack-sharp results. Articulating screen helps with critical focus at awkward angles.

Winner: A99

Night and Astro Photography

Criteria: high ISO performance, long exposure capabilities.

  • S2000: ISO tops at 3200 but noisy past 400. No manual exposure modes, limiting control over long exposures needed for astro.

  • A99: ISO up to 25600 with usable high ISO shots. Full manual modes allow long exposure and bulb settings. Weather sealing is a plus for cold night shoots.

Winner: A99

Video Capabilities

  • S2000: Limited VGA resolution (640x480) at 30fps with MJPEG format produces basic clips only.

  • A99: Full HD 1080p at 60fps, AVCHD and H.264 codecs, microphone and headphone ports facilitate serious videography.

Winner: A99

Travel Photography

Portability, battery life, weather resistance.

  • S2000: Ultra-compact, lightweight, runs on AA batteries you can easily replace anywhere. Perfect for casual vacation shots if you want a simple, point-and-shoot experience.

  • A99: Bulkier but weather sealed with excellent battery life (~500 shots). More suitable if you want the flexibility to do everything professionally on the road.

Winner: S2000 for minimalist travel; A99 for professional travel needs.

Professional Workflows

File formats, reliability, tethering.

  • S2000: JPEG-only outputs limit post-processing flex. No tethering.

  • A99: Full RAW support critical for professional retouching. Dual card slots for backup. Built-in GPS tags images for professional cataloging.

Winner: A99

Other Technical Considerations

Battery and Storage

  • S2000: Runs on 2x AA batteries - cheap and replaceable worldwide but fewer shots per set. Single storage slot (Memory Stick Duo, optionally SD).

  • A99: Proprietary rechargeable battery (NP-FM500H) with excellent longevity. Dual SD and Memory Stick slots support higher capacity and backup workflows.

Connectivity

Neither model offers Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or NFC, which is understandable given their release dates. The A99 does include HDMI out for external monitors and USB 2.0.

Price-to-Performance Ratio

The S2000 is extremely affordable (~$225 new) and ideal for entry-level users or as a secondary travel camera. Its limitations reflect its price point.

The A99, priced near $2000 at launch, delivers pro-grade imaging, build, and ergonomics. It’s a serious investment intended for photographers who demand high quality and flexibility.



Who Should Buy Which Camera?

Choose the Sony Cyber-shot S2000 if…

  • You want a simple, pocketable compact for casual shooting.
  • Portability and ease of use are your top priorities.
  • You have a tight budget but desire decent image quality in bright conditions.
  • You value convenience over advanced controls or image quality.
  • You enjoy travel or snapshot photography without fuss.

Choose the Sony A99 if…

  • You are a serious enthusiast or professional needing high resolution and full control.
  • You demand excellent image quality, dynamic range, and high ISO performance.
  • You require fast continuous shooting and advanced autofocus for sports or wildlife.
  • Interchangeable lenses and system versatility are must-haves.
  • You want strong video capabilities and a robust, weather-sealed body.
  • You shoot portraits, landscapes, macro, or any specialized genres professionally.

Final Thoughts

These Sony cameras serve fundamentally different purposes. The Cyber-shot S2000 is a no-frills compact for easy, casual photography with limited creative potential but great portability and budget appeal. The Sony A99, meanwhile, remains a powerhouse for photographers who need precision, speed, and uncompromised image quality in a seasonally weather-sealed body.

From sensor technology to lens options, autofocus systems, and build, the A99 outclasses the S2000 by every measurable metric - though at ten times the price and roughly five times the size and weight. Your choice depends entirely on your photographic ambitions and how much control you crave in your images.

Whichever you choose, make sure your camera matches your style, subjects, and how you want to grow as a photographer. And remember, from my extensive hands-on experience, the best camera is ultimately the one you enjoy using most consistently.

Summary Table

Feature Sony S2000 Sony A99
Image Quality Basic; noisy past ISO 400 Excellent full-frame performance
Autofocus Slow contrast-detect, no tracking Fast phase-detect, face and AF tracking
Lens Fixed zoom (33-105mm) Interchangeable; 143+ lenses
Handling Compact, lightweight Larger, heavier, weather sealed
Controls Basic; no manual exposure modes Advanced, customizable
Video VGA (640x480) only Full HD 1080p at 60fps
Battery 2x AA batteries Rechargeable with long life
Weather Sealing None Yes
Price ~$225 ~$2000

I hope this hands-on Sony S2000 vs. A99 comparison helps you zero in on the perfect camera for your photography journey. If you want further advice about lenses or accessories for either system, feel free to ask!

Sony S2000 vs Sony A99 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sony S2000 and Sony A99
 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000Sony SLT-A99
General Information
Brand Sony Sony
Model type Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 Sony SLT-A99
Class Small Sensor Compact Advanced DSLR
Revealed 2010-01-07 2012-12-12
Body design Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Chip Bionz Bionz
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Full frame
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 35.8 x 23.8mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 852.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 24 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3456 x 2592 6000 x 4000
Max native ISO 3200 25600
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 9 19
Cross type focus points - 11
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens zoom range 33-105mm (3.2x) -
Highest aperture f/3.1-5.6 -
Macro focusing range 5cm -
Amount of lenses - 143
Crop factor 5.8 1
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Display sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 1,229 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display technology - TFT Xtra Fine color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.71x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 1s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/1200s 1/8000s
Continuous shutter speed 1.0 frames per second 10.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.30 m no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync - 1/250s
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 167 gr (0.37 lb) 812 gr (1.79 lb)
Physical dimensions 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") 147 x 111 x 78mm (5.8" x 4.4" x 3.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 89
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 25.0
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 14.0
DXO Low light rating not tested 1555
Other
Battery life - 500 shots
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery ID 2 x AA NP-FM500H
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo; SD, SDHC and SDXC
Storage slots Single Dual
Cost at release $225 $1,998