Sony T900 vs Sony TX200V
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Sony T900 vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Introduced February 2009
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Released January 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Sony T900 vs Sony TX200V Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Sony T900 vs Sony TX200V, both Ultracompact cameras and both of them are built by Sony. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the T900 (12MP) and TX200V (18MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe T900 was announced 3 years prior to the TX200V and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a short overview of how the T900 scores versus the TX200V in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Sony T900 vs Sony TX200V Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The whole galleries are provided at Sony T900 Gallery & Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Sony TX200V
| T900 | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3.3" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Sony T900
| TX200V | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 35 months |
| Display resolution | 1230k |  | 922k | Crisper display (+308k dot) |
Common features in the Sony T900 and Sony TX200V
| T900 | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Sony T900 vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Sony T900 enjoys exterior measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs) and the Sony TX200V has specifications of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check the Sony T900 vs Sony TX200V in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the T900 against the TX200V.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the T900 and TX200V is 96 and 96 respectively.
Sony T900 vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to envision the contrast in sensor measurements just by going through specs. The visual underneath should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the T900 and TX200V.
All in all, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Sony TX200V to produce extra detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos more aggressively. The older T900 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Sony T900 vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Sony T900 vs Sony TX200V Specifications
| Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Sony | Sony |
| Model | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2009-02-17 | 2012-01-30 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 18MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-140mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-10.0 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3.5 inches | 3.3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 922k dots | 1,230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 2 secs | 2 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) | 3.10 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 143g (0.32 pounds) | 129g (0.28 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 photos |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $300 | $500 |