Sony T900 vs Sony W330

Below is a in-depth assessment of the Sony T900 and Sony W330, both Ultracompact digital cameras and both of them are designed by Sony. The resolution of the T900 (12MP) and the W330 (14MP) is fairly similar and both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The T900 was manufactured 10 months prior to the W330 so they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before going straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short summary of how the T900 matches up vs the W330 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330. The entire galleries are available at Sony T900 Gallery & Sony W330 Gallery.

If you are aiming to lug around your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Sony T900 comes with external dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs) whilst the Sony W330 has dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 17mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).

Compare the Sony T900 and Sony W330 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select at the time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the T900 against the W330.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the T900 and W330 is 96 and 96 respectively.

Typically, it is very tough to see the gap between sensor measurements merely by going over specs. The photograph here may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the T900 and W330.

As you can plainly see, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Sony W330 to deliver greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images more aggressively. The older T900 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.