Sony T900 vs Sony WX500
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
91 Imaging
43 Features
56 Overall
48
Sony T900 vs Sony WX500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Revealed February 2009
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.4) lens
- 236g - 102 x 58 x 36mm
- Announced April 2015
- Superseded the Sony WX350
Sony T900 vs Sony WX500 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Sony T900 vs Sony WX500, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are designed by Sony. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the T900 (12MP) and WX500 (18MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe T900 was revealed 7 years before the WX500 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony WX500 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a brief summary of how the T900 matches up against the WX500 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sony T900 vs Sony WX500 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500. The full galleries are provided at Sony T900 Gallery and Sony WX500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Sony WX500
T900 | WX500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Display dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 921k | Clearer display (+1k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony WX500 over the Sony T900
WX500 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | April 2015 | February 2009 | Fresher by 74 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Sony T900 and Sony WX500
T900 | WX500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Sony T900 vs Sony WX500 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Sony T900 enjoys exterior dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs) and the Sony WX500 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") along with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Contrast the Sony T900 vs Sony WX500 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the T900 vs the WX500.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the T900 and WX500 is 96 and 91 respectively.
Sony T900 vs Sony WX500 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to see the difference in sensor sizing merely by researching specs. The visual underneath should offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the T900 and WX500.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Sony WX500 to provide you with more detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The older T900 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Sony T900 vs Sony WX500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sony T900 vs Sony WX500 Specifications
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Sony | Sony |
Model type | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500 |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-02-17 | 2015-04-14 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 18MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 35-140mm (4.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-10.0 | f/3.5-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3.5" | 3" |
Display resolution | 922 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 2 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) | 5.40 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, flash on, slow sync, flash off, rear sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 143g (0.32 lb) | 236g (0.52 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 102 x 58 x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 360 shots |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $300 | $348 |